Click to Skip Ad
Closing in...

Shockingly, AT&T’s CEO thinks the government’s merger appeal will fail

Updated Jul 16th, 2018 8:47AM EDT
AT&T merger news, update, DoJ appeal
Image: Shutterstock

If you buy through a BGR link, we may earn an affiliate commission, helping support our expert product labs.

Brace yourself for this stunning turn of events, but AT&T CEO Randall Stephenson doesn’t think much of the Justice Department’s decision to appeal a ruling allowing AT&T to merge with Time Warner. In an interview with CNBC Friday morning, Stephenson said the chances of the decision being overturned are “really remote,” and that his plans for the combined business will move ahead regardless.

“This changes nothing we’ll be doing over the next 30 days or the next 12 months. We’re about executing our plan. We think the likelihood of this thing being reversed and overturned is really remote. It’s a very narrow path that would have to be traveled to get this thing reversed in any way,” Stephenson told CNBC in the interview. “The merger is closed. We own Time Warner.”

The Justice Department announced yesterday that it’s planning on appealing the ruling, although it declined to seek a stay of the ruling, meaning that AT&T has been free to gobble up Time Warner in the meantime. With the merger approved by the judge, AT&T has already taken steps to integrate Time Warner into its business. It has been renamed WarnerMedia, and AT&T has rolled out a $15-a-month streaming service that heavily uses some of the content owned by WarnerMedia.

AT&T has also raised fees for wireless customers and its DirecTV Now streaming service since closing the merger, which runs against the statements of its expert witnesses in the case, who said that merging with Time Warner would create efficiencies and allow the company to lower the prices charged to consumers.”The more engagement you have the more opportunity you have to create value,” Stephenson said on CNBC. “When people hear that they say, ‘That means they’re going to be pumping a lot more content into HBO.’ Maybe. But we’re looking at a lot of different avenues for driving engagement. We have a lot of digital properties.”

The Justice Department’s main argument against the merger was that by owning Time Warner’s content, which includes must-have channels like CNN, AT&T could raise prices for pay-TV rivals and keep costs prohibitive for online streaming services. The transition to streaming services, away from traditional cable, is one that’s costing pay TV companies millions of subscribers and billions in revenue every year.

With control over a significant portion of the content, AT&T is now in a good place to keep prices high among rivals and prevent streaming TV services from offering cut-price cable alternatives. With cheap home internet increasingly becoming a reality, cable companies are faced with the prospect of millions of subscribers cutting the cord over the next decade.

Chris Mills
Chris Mills News Editor

Chris Mills has been a news editor and writer for over 15 years, starting at Future Publishing, Gawker Media, and then BGR. He studied at McGill University in Quebec, Canada.