Click to Skip Ad
Closing in...
  1. Mattress Topper Amazon
    14:52 Deals

    35,000 Amazon shoppers gave this mattress topper 5 stars – get one for $34 today

  2. Amazon Deals
    07:55 Deals

    10 deals you don’t want to miss on Saturday: Alexa in your car for $19.99, $200 Chro…

  3. MacBook Pro 2021 Price
    16:34 Deals

    Amazon slashed $200 off Apple’s M1 MacBook Pro, or get a MacBook Air for $899

  4. Amazon Echo Auto Price
    13:16 Deals

    Add hands-free Alexa to your car for $19.99 with this Amazon deal

  5. Amazon Deals
    07:56 Deals

    10 deals you don’t want to miss on Sunday: $30 off Amazon Echo Buds, $230 convertibl…

Apple doubles down on encryption, tells judge it’s ‘impossible’ to unlock new iPhones

October 21st, 2015 at 7:15 AM
Apple iPhone iOS Encryption

As long as a new iPhone is protected by a password, pin, or fingerprint, and it’s running the latest operating system for it Apple can’t unlock it, the company told a U.S. judge. However, Apple can unlock for law enforcement older devices.

DON’T MISS: ‘Netflix for pirates’ now streams movies directly to your web browser

According to Reuters, Apple told the judge that unlocking a protected iPhone is “impossible,” affirming that it has the “technical ability” to access data on older phones.

This isn’t the first time Apple is publicly defending its stance on iOS encryption in courts. The company has consistently reminded customers that privacy and security are of utmost importance, even though law enforcement agencies criticized its choice to encrypt iOS devices and communications via iMessage and FaceTime.

In a court document, Apple said that 90% of its devices run iOS 8 or later, which means it can’t grant the Justice Department’s request to access a seized iPhone. Apple could access the 10% of its devices running iOS 7 or older, including the one at issue in the case, but urged the judge not to require it to comply with the Justice Department’s request.

“Forcing Apple to extract data, in this case, absent clear legal authority to do so, could threaten the trust between Apple and its customers and substantially tarnish the Apple brand,” Apple’s lawyers wrote.

Earlier this month, U.S. Magistrate Judge James Orenstein said it he wasn’t sure he could ask Apple to disable security on the iPhone, and cited Congress’ failure to act on encryption in spite of the numerous requests from the Justice Department and FBI. Orenstein instead said it would ask Apple if the endeavor was feasible, and a hearing is scheduled for Thursday now that the iPhone maker explained its stance.

Chris Smith started writing about gadgets as a hobby, and before he knew it he was sharing his views on tech stuff with readers around the world. Whenever he's not writing about gadgets he miserably fails to stay away from them, although he desperately tries. But that's not necessarily a bad thing.

Popular News