iConfess: Why an Android fan recommends the iPhone

mobile

Just over five years ago, Steve Jobs unveiled the iPhone, a device that would change the world forever. The Macworld Conference & Expo keynote in 2007 is one that will go down in history. With its announcement, Apple reinvented the smartphone and put converged handsets on mainstream consumers’ radar. The iPhone seamlessly integrated music, email, a phone, a camera and Internet access all into one great device. I personally never had an interest in smartphones until the Macworld announcement, and countless others can likely make the same claim. There was just one problem, however… Apple partnered exclusively with Cingular in the U.S. for the release of the iPhone. At the time, Cingular was the biggest carrier in the U.S. with 58 million customers  — to show how rapidly the market has grown in recent years, the nation’s largest carrier Verizon reported having 108.7 million subscribers at the end of 2011 — but I was in no way interested in moving to a new carrier and therefore I was forced to pass on the iPhone.

I carried on with a slew of basic flip phones in the two years following the iPhone’s unveiling. I also heard about this so called “Google Phone” (the G1) on T-Mobile and after further research, I was thoroughly unimpressed. Little did I know Motorola, Google and Verizon were in the midst of creating something big — the DROID. In October, the three companies teased upcoming the device with a brilliant iDon’t commercial. To this day, the commercial is as iconic to me as the 1984 Mac commercial is to Apple fans… it was the beginning of a new era. Not only was the DROID an immediate hit for Verizon, I believe it is the sole reason Android is what it is today. After the lackluster Android devices that came before it, Google bet it all on Motorola’s flagship phone and that bet paid off.

The clunkiness of the DROID wasn’t for me but with a Verizon iPhone nowhere in sight, I knew an Android device was in my future. Once the DROID X was released I snapped it up and quickly became an “Android fanboy.” With Google’s platform, the user is in control. He or she has the option to have a keyboard, a full touchscreen, a massive display, or whatever else his or her heart may desire. As a self-described nerd, I soon plunged into the world of rooting and custom ROMs, which is an endless adventure thanks to the incredible Android developer community.

But Android’s openness ultimately may be its downfall, unfortunately, as carriers and manufactures have slowly turned the operating system into something less glamorous. The Android platform can theoretically be loaded onto any device, so any no-name company can market a smartphone or tablet as “Android.” When a user inevitably receives one of these $99 “Android” tablets for Christmas, his or her experience will be less than stellar to say the least. Most of these cheap devices don’t even include the Android Market due to Google’s restrictions, leaving consumers with virtually no quality applications and further tarnishing the experience.

Even mainstream manufacturers make buying an Android device a hassle. Motorola released the DROID BIONIC in September, the DROID RAZR in November, and the DROID RAZR Maxx in January. To make matters worse, the company announced a new version of the RAZR with an unlockable bootloader not long ago. A new Android device is released almost every month from major manufacturers, often leaving consumers with severe cases of buyer’s remorse. Some manufacturers have at least promised to slow down when it comes to releasing smartphones in the future, but mobile technology advances too quickly to sit idle for very long.

Lastly, each carrier and manufacturer is looking to out-do the competition. Rather than marketing devices and services with competitive pricing, these companies fill handsets with unnecessary bloatware and custom user interface skins. The skins are supposed to “enhance” a user’s experience but more often then not, they lead to incompatibilities, error messages, forced closures, poor battery performance and lag. Switching between a Motorola device and an HTC device will give the consumer a completely different experience. Android itself has no consistent flow, although Google hopes to change that with the release of Ice Cream Sandwich.

When Apple announces a device, the company also announces a release date. The carriers don’t tell Apple when to release a product, Apple tells the carriers when it will release a product. Google might be well-served to find a way to gain some of this assertiveness; the company’s latest flagship device, the Galaxy Nexus, was announced in October. During the event, Google announced European release date but no firm details regarding a North American launch were provided. The company said it was “coming soon” — the two most dreaded words in all of technology. Verizon then delayed the handset’s launch for unknown reasons until it was released nearly two months after its unveiling. This would never happen with an Apple product.

When you power on an iPhone it works, plain and simple. The iPhone has no carrier branding whatsoever, nor does it have any bloatware. In addition, it has access to the most incredible App Store in the mobile world, hands down. The device is slick, clean and stylish, which is exactly in line with Apple’s image. I have seen kids as young as six to adults as old as 80 using the device… it is that simple.

This is why I recommend the iPhone to my family, my friends and even the majority of people I speak to — even though I am a huge Android fan and I write about the platform for a living. I can admit when a product I enjoy has its flaws, and in no way am I saying the iPhone is perfect. You can call me an iSheep, iFan, iDan or whatever else you want, but when push comes to shove, 99% of consumers don’t care about rooting, ROMs or the concept of being “open.” They just want a sleek smartphone with a wide selection of great apps that can browse the Web, check email, text and make phone calls. In this regard, the iPhone is the clear choice.

27 Comments
  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=12402140 Erik Balster

    Wow, so many babies on here. Guess what? People prefer the iPhone. Complicated doesn’t necessarily mean better, which is why android is an alternative to the iPhone rather than something on its on level like nerds on here want to believe.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1592885801 Abby Gudac Adams

    I find it interesting that everyone complains about Android and how the experience is device-based, but no one has yet to make the connection that this is the exact same scenario with Windows v. Mac. If you get a crappy laptop with Windows 7, your experience will be crappy…same with the base Android phones. If you compare a top of the line Android phone (Galaxy nexus) v. iphone the experience of the Android phone is very smooth and stable…just like the iphone. at that point you are strictly making a decision that is based on preference. What the user wants.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=3206085 Ryan McMahan

    I agree wholeheartedly. I was so eager to get a droid and was very happy with my HTC Incredible (still the best android phone, I think) – however.. the way Android OEM’s push out new devices, and the way Google handles updates… it left me always wanting more, eager for the next thing. Ever since I switched to my iPhone 4, I have not even considered another phone. The mentality that Apple has – that it should “just work” – is absolutely right. Android always left me caring about the processor speed, what OS version it was running (or more accurately, NOT running), all about the specs… the iPhone strips all that way and just presents a beautiful device from a hardware and software standpoint – hard to find that in an Android device.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100001388605858 Rascal Cat

    I have to admit that many of your points are well thought out, but I think several of them could be argued..

    (1) bloatware. yes, I’ve had phones loaded with bloatware. they sit there and never get used. they don’t just pop up and force me to use them. they sit there unused.

    (2) appstore. I don’t know if Apple’s appstore is “hands down” the best anymore. More and more, you find major products being released on both Android and iOS.

    (3) release dates. I am not sure how this really matters in recommending a phone. unless you are recommending your friends and family buy every iteration of the iPhone every time it comes out. if all consumers want is a slick phone that does apps, internet, mail, text and phone calls, then they should never really ever have to upgrade to a newer iPhone. unless they want features in a newer version of iOS which are not supported for older hardware, which does happen with iOS.

    Yes, I hate most of the skins, and think they are not as good an attempt to “simplify” the usage for the common many as iOS is. For 6 year olds and 80 year olds, people I know will not want to or be able to do much beyond use it out of the box. A lot of people I work with and know are technically inclined (to the point where they are excited they can soon have an ubuntu desktop on their android phones). these are the ones I recommend the Android phones to.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=596438658 Adolfo Foronda

    As a longtime Droid X user and as a developer I absolutely agree with your article, thanks for posting.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=508490040 Saki Asterismos

    snap!

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100001586591904 Kaustubh Chaudhuri

    agree with Andrew Leber ; i came from a HTC HD2 (WM6.1), Installed & removed WM6.5, WP7, but
    stuck with Android GB!

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1332240301 Dan Graziano

    Saki Asterismos it works a lot better after a root, detox, and custom ROM. Unfortunately 99% of users will never do that. Carriers and manufacturers are taking advantage of Google and the Android OS with bloatware and terrible skins, all my opinion of course.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=508490040 Saki Asterismos

    Dan Graziano I a inm Canada, and Telus and Bell dont bloat their cell phones here. The only thing Telus added to the stock ROM is the Telus logo at the beginning. So im getting the pure Samsung experience, i cant judge on your bloat situation.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1084899215 Jay Rock

    Dan Graziano 99% of consumers DONT CARE about that. they have spoken man its plain and simple. year after year android is on top. like how hard is that to see? the iphone is on EVERY CARRRIER IN THE WORLD yet android is still outselling them. that has to say something…and it doesnt say its cheap cause the galaxy s2 did 20mil! and my galaxy nexus cost $299. so…

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000261992602 Rhonin Dk

    Applies to any “app” on iOS that you cannot remove or hide or replace.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=533780146 Steve Frechette

    iBooks is not installed by default and is fully removable, unlike the *actual* Android bloatware the article refers to.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=9325656 Steve Brady

    Steve Frechette Okay, I will give you that one. But aren’t there other apps that are just “on the screen” that you can’t delete or hide? That’s the nice thing about the android–you have the screens with apps, AND the folder with all the apps if you have things you only use occasionally.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=533780146 Steve Frechette

    Steve Brady You can delete anything outside of the “basic apps” like Compass, Calculator, Clock, Maps, Notes, Reminders, Settings, Stocks, Voice Memos, and Weather.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=9325656 Steve Brady

    Steve Frechette And that’s my point. Those basic apps are “Bloatware” if I don’t want to use them. If I can’t delete them, and I prefer to use another app, then… bloatware. The point is, what is bloatware to one is “integral” to another, I suggest we all rant against apps we can’t delete, regardless of the value we think they provide us.

    That said, there is that “other” sticking point: Apple won’t let developers create apps that provide functionality that already exists. Limiting, don’t you think?

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=2803809 Christian Brady

    The only one that really rankles me is the one Roger referred to: Newstand. On the iPhone I don’t use it but I can’t delete it (not as big a deal as the fact), I can’t put it in a folder. Annoying. (On the iPad I use it because I subscribe to a few mags like PopPhoto.)

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1314045556 Darren Workman-Stirling

    iPhone is 5 years old
    Apps that the Apple app store has more of by far and far m ore compatible as well as being more fluid.
    Apps that integrate with the most fluid mobile music market in the world phone market and the digital music market iTunes
    GPS? the same Google Maps that you can use as GPS on an iPhone? it is also free and comes on the iPhone by default.

    I could also go on and on contradicting your points and I will admit if theres something that is not there, for example on the iPhone playing angry birds, my iPhone will not lag whereas my friends Android samsung is glitchy and it does get annoying. Kthxbai4now

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1445989786 Justin Trujillo

    Vinny Amador More Blah blah blah. More excuse to be ignorant. Sorry the desire to lack knowledge about the things you buy is not an excuse. Nor does that automatically somehow make them more intelligent. Such a mindset would indicate they care just as little about other aspects of their lives. I don’t have a doctoral in cell phones but I will take some time to research what i’m about to spend my hard earned money on rather then just following along with what Apples marketing tells me is the best for me.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=37601905 Ryan Fraley

    Fanboy argument. Key on the word BOY. Yes, hundreds of different SKU’s beat Apple in sales, but not in profit. What’s the goal of business again? Winning can mean anything you define it to, but at least show some intelligence and move the goalposts in the right direction, which would be the open systems Android is based on and moving control toward more skilled end users. Now Android is not for everyone. That’s the point of the article. However, Fandroids who make these arguments are just the same as the iCult IMO.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=583502558 Spencer Bellamy

    Normally you could be right, however android has an almost 2 to 1 marketshare lead over the iphone in the US and often much larger in overseas markets even though the iphone really had almost 2 years head start. What this means is that the 99% you described are mostly using android already without issue. The reality is that the 99% dont care AT ALL about the points the author brought up. Those issues are HIS issues, not everyone’s.
    I usually recommend to people the best device for their specific needs overall. And for around two years now it has almost always NOT been an iphone.
    When someone comes to me and says, “hey what car should i get?”, i don’t say, “hey, you’re an average dumb person, so the camry that everyone else has is perfect” I say, what do you need? 4 wheel drive? how many seats? cost? insurance? etc…
    The author is treating his family/friends like they are shallow idiots who do not deserve the best product they can buy because he cant be bothered to give them a real recommendation. And in the process locking them into the WORST ecosystem in technology.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=583502558 Spencer Bellamy

    Martin Hill It’s becoming apparent that you are not able to understand what I am saying. I will try one more time.
    The current as of today marketshare of the US smartphone market is ~50 percent android, ~29 percent iphone, and ~16 percent blackberry.

    Apple has held a markeshare as a percentage in the 20′s for years now. It has grown, but at a slow and measured pace. I fully expect it to continue to grow until attitudes and cultures change which is outside of a technology perspective. Android will also continue to grow.
    Your misunderstanding is trying to make sales volume share for a particular quarter into something that it is not. This was a major upgrade cycle event for iphone users and in particular sprint sold nearly 2 million devices. It was a delayed, super hyped event, iphone owners held off on purchases in anticipation (thus a reason why apples 3rd quarter was a disappointment). And it was released during the holiday quarter. It actually should have sold more than it did. It missed sales volume estimates by 10-15 percent.
    There’s a lot more to the story about the iphone4 sales statistics that you are either deliberately ignoring or dont know about, otherwise you would have not made the comment you did.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=600972512 Daniel Kang

    Spencer Bellamy – It is true the Android phones have bigger market share and that is commendable. And I take your point – Android has sold more and has greater market share. But what do you expect? You have Samsung, LG, Motorolla and Sony who have been traditional phone companies as well. As someone above said, its Apple vs the rest of the world and the rest of the world is winning… right. You should be so proud. You cannot realistically expect Apple to beat everyone. And that’s not Apple’s game either. As it stands, they can barely meet the demand anyway. Missing sales volume by 10-15 percent? That’s not what I read from news when Apple revealed their sales record – it beat almost all analysts expectations.

    While I sound like Apple fanboy (and to a certain extent I am), it is also worth noting that Apple became third largest phone maker – that is beating even LG. That’s quite incredible for a company who did not have any presence in the market only 5 years ago, with only having handful of SKU’s.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=567250082 Kyle Maynard

    Spencer Bellamy To be fair, you’re talking about only the marketshare of the smartphones, which isn’t the same as the platform. If you’re talking platform’s, iOS is firmly in the lead.

    http://www.bgr.com/2011/10/03/ios-and-mac-os-x-market-shares-hit-record-highs
    http://www.networkworld.com/news/2011/050211-apple-ios-share.html
    ]http://forums.macrumors.com/showpost.php?p=13767311&postcount=1

    Also, should have sold more then it did? Are you crazy?

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=717947739 Martin Hill

    And this was despite the new iPhone 4s being “disappointing” and hardly any change compared to the iPhone 4.

    The public is not dumb. They just want a phone with crapware, malware, that has guaranteed system updates, that has the most apps, by far the most top tier games, the most 3rd party hardware peripherals, cases, content, developers, car steering wheel integration etc etc.

    Basically they want the best phone – thecosystems or the majority of people and the best ecosystem and that ecosystem is Apple’s iOS.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=717947739 Martin Hill

    Heh, of course that previous comment would have read “they just want a phone without crapware”!

    Also, the last sentence should have said “they want the best phone for the majority of people”.

    Sorry about that.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=740503889 Mark Ivan Jacobson

    Justin Trujillo I can honestly tell you that in a year, I have yet to hear about or see any of the 4 iOS5 devices in our house crash. We use an iPad, iPad 2, iPod touch 4th gen, and just added a 4S replacing an HTC Rezound that crashed and was incompatible with half the games in the Android Market.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100001057513848 Vinny Amador

    Justin Trujillo – Justin did you read the Crittercism study or just repeat what the little synopsis and what everyone else repeats endlessly? The crittercism “study” looked at app crashes not OS stability. The study showed that there was little statistical significance in crashes for top tier apps, with android apps at that level a bit more stable than ios apps. Tier 2 apps crashed significantly more for ios than android, so I guess the moral of that story is that if you own an ipod, get top quality apps. That “study”, which was not a study but crittercism’s way of self promoting to sell their services, lists very clearly the limitations that they could not control for including how many others apps were running on the devices, the signal strength, availability of data and numerous other variables. You are certainly free to believe whatever you like, but you might want to go and actually read the “study” and see what you think then. At this point there is no study done on OS stability and until someone specifically does one, and controls for lots more variables than this self promotion of Crittercism’s services does, the best you can say is that tier 2 and 3 apps crash more often on ios. Big deal.

blog comments powered by Disqus