Microsoft ordered to pay $290M patent fine

Legal

The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday ruled against Microsoft in an appeal tied to a major patent dispute, ordering the Redmond-based company to pay a record $290 million patent fine. Supreme Court justices voted unanimously to uphold an earlier judgement stating Microsoft had infringed patents belonging to small Canadian software firm i4i. The judgement comes following a legal battle that began in 2007 when i4i sued the software giant claiming its Microsoft Word productivity software infringed on i4i patents. I4i was awarded $290 million by a federal judge at that time, and Microsoft would proceed to appeal the ruling for four years despite agreeing to alter its software in order to remove the infringing features.

Read

24 Comments
  • Anonymous

    bgr is happy i bet!

  • http://twitter.com/apdcgt greentea

    the patent troll gets trolled by other patent trolls. Gotta love patents.

    • http://twitter.com/simoncabron Simon Cabron

      I thought you had to not actually produce something to be considered a patent troll

      • Anonymous

        No, on internet forums, ANYTIME you sue someone based on a patent, trademark, or copyright, it’s “trolling”.

    • Anonymous

      Fucking read the article. I wish I could punch you in your throat.

  • Stan Winstone

    Disgusting- much as I loathe MSOFT the Supreme Court just opened the floodgates to hell. That sound you hear is a million lawyers jumping on planes for those looney patent loving judges in East Texas…

    • Anonymous

      Hmm… I live in East Texas… Don’t worry. I’m not a judge. Or a lawyer. Or a redneck.

  • Anonymous

    That’s just a small drop  in the bucket for Microslush.
    Their major concern, henceforth, should be on removing those hideous tiles from Windows Mobile.

    • Anonymous

      The major concern now is that the Supreme Court has opened the floodgates for patent trolls. I’ve seen enough of your posting to know that you’ll think that anything bad that happens to MS is good.

      This is not one of those times. This is bad for all corporations. This just means that people can write preposterously vague patents on things that are obvious, get the patents passed, and then sue the shit out of everyone and their mother for infringement. It’s a waste of resources that could go towards making products better.

      • Troy

        I4I had created an actual product that they sold to the the U.S. government and big pharma amongst others. Simililar products from other companies were selling for $800+ per license. Microsoft was talking to I4I about licensing their code for use in Microsoft products; then they abrubtly cut off communication. A little while later that exact code, line for line, showed up in Microsoft word; which was bundled with new computers or sold for less then $100/license. They effectivly stole i4i’s code and inserted into their own product causing i4i’s sales to come to a halt. Why pay i4i when you can get the product for free with a new computer purchase.

        I’m sure if I came out with a new operating system that used Microsofts Windows code, and gave it away, Microsoft wouldn’t be to happy about it.

        Nothing new from MS. They’re well known for stealing other companies code and using their financial resources to litigating them into the ground. Its done wonders for their botton line.

      • Anonymous

        You know what they say: when you can’t innovate, litigate. They’re hardly the only ones.

        I didn’t know i4i had legitimately released something, though. I do wonder about the obviousness of the patent, but there’s really no point in even arguing that these days. If you can write a patent, it’ll get passed. Obviousness just doesn’t exist.
        If MS cribbed the code verbatim, though, they don’t have a leg to stand on. If there had been some differences, they could have at least said it was developed internally, left hand didn’t know what the right was doing, etc. That’s just fuckery.

  • Anonymous

    Hahahahaha PWN’d!

  • Anonymous

    Good thing they didn’t charge the interest for 4 years. At a conservative rate of 4% for that amount would be like $50M more.

    • Anonymous

      For a second there I thought you were going to make a post about clenbuterol…..lol

      • Anonymous

        You mean “food contamination”…lol. anyway I’m his fan…but just if he
        doesn’t get involved in this again.

      • Anonymous

        Lol, I agree, his showing in the Giro was defining, I figure as long as he does not give a non negative during that race then he must be clean, probably the hardest grand tour he has ever ridden and in the most dominating fashion.

      • Anonymous

        Yes, the show he did with Tiralongo in Stage 19 deserves to be in a Disney
        movie: “Tiralongo .. a lifetime as gregario, 1 day as a champion”. can’t
        wait for the tour. thumbs up

  • Anonymous

    we’re Microsoft…. if it’s ours it’s ours, and if it’s yours, it’s ours too.

  • Anonymous

    Msft wipes its ass each day with that kind money.

    Its chump change for them.

  • http://twitter.com/EwanTouma Ewan Touma

    In its history in Canada Microsoft hasn’t made 290 million and now they will lose 290 million to Canada. Thanks for all the free software.

    • Jimmy K

      Uh, this was a US patent, and it was settled in US court.
      Secondly, they have made much more than 290 million in Canada.

      But yeah, boo microsoft, boo.

  • Drshrek

    microsucks!

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Eric-Kroh/509408139 Eric Kroh

    wow..Crapsung isnt far behind Microcrap..lol

  • drew dogg

    Dam I wonder how much Microsoft continued making off it for those four years they drug through appeals?

blog comments powered by Disqus