Click to Skip Ad
Closing in...

Samsung shows third-party ads in the phone app on its $1,400 Galaxy Z Flip, and we can’t believe it

Published Feb 18th, 2020 4:44PM EST
Apple vs Samsung
Image: Samsung

If you buy through a BGR link, we may earn an affiliate commission, helping support our expert product labs.

In a blog post that has attracted a pretty sizable amount of attention today, Tumblr software engineer Steve Streza called out Apple pretty harshly for what he sees as the iPhone maker shoving way too many ads in its users’ faces. Those ads generally market new Apple services and subscriptions like Apple TV+ and Apple News+, and because the company’s services business that encompasses those offerings is such a focus for Apple right now, Streza’s argument is that Apple is going way overboard in advertising those products.

Taken as a whole, Streza writes, Apple’s services business raked in $12.7 billion in Q1 2020, almost a sixth of Apple’s overall revenue for the quarter. “All that money comes from the wallets of 480 million subscribers, and their goal is to grow that number to 600 million this year,” Streza’s post reads. “But to do that, Apple has resorted to insidious tactics to get those people: Ads. Lots and lots of ads, on devices that you pay for.” Here are examples of the kind of thing he’s talking about.

If you open the Apple News app for the first time, you may be greeted with a full-screen display that looks like this before you ever dive into the aggregated news content this app serves up:

Image source: Apple

The app has a free tier, as well as a $9.99/month subscription offering. That’s what Apple hits you up to pay for straight away, and with little reminders here and there as you go about using the free tier.

Here’s another example. Apple’s TV app is where you go to watch episodes of TV shows you’ve rented or bought, as well as movies. It’s also your entry point into Apple’s still relatively new subscription TV offering, Apple TV+. When I open the app, click “Watch Now” and then scroll down a bit, same thing — I’m hit up by Apple to subscribe to its paid TV product. After I scroll down a little, this is the marketing message I see:

Image source: Apple

I don’t know about you, but I don’t mind Apple advertising me a paid tier of a product whose app I’ve just opened up. I believe I may also have seen a bit of cross-pollination, such as Apple TV+ ads as I scroll through Apple News+, but “believe” is the operative word. It certainly wasn’t to a level that annoyed me and that I made a point of remembering. This, though, is at the heart of Streza’s beef: “If you don’t subscribe to these services,” he writes, “you’ll be forced to look at these ads constantly, either in the apps you use or the push notifications they have turned on by default.”

Again, I can’t sympathize with the latter half of that sentence, because I adjust the default push notifications for each app on my phone. If you don’t do that, and I know most of you don’t, why would you then complain about getting too many push notifications? Makes no sense! (In my best Larry David-as-Bernie Sanders voice.)

One example Streza uses is Apple Music, which he seems to have gotten this notification for after unsubscribing:

Image source: Apple

“If you subscribe and then cancel, Apple sends invasive push notifications asking you to re-subscribe,” he writes. “These are on by default without a permission request. This is, of course, against the rules they lay out for other developers” which he then includes a portion of:

Push Notifications must not be required for the app to function, and should not be used for advertising, promotions, or direct marketing purposes or to send sensitive personal or confidential information.

He theorizes that one reason these practices from Apple aren’t talked about as much is that Apple loyalists likely subscribe to some or all of these services, eliminating the need for those people to be advertised to. Still, he concludes, “it’s time for the tech community to recognize that Apple is no longer designing their products for a great experience, but as upsells to get you into the paywalled garden.”

Ok, but why then aren’t we including Samsung in this discussion?

Behold, one of the most annoying places imaginable to include personalized ads on a smartphone:

I’m sorry, but you can’t convince me that that isn’t worse than the ads above that Apple is showing. It’s the difference between paying almost $1,400 for a phone and getting shown ads for things you might be interested in every time you dial a number to call, compared to opening a free app and being shown an ad for that app when you’re already inside it. Thankfully, these ads on Samsung phones which are tied to its Places tab can be disabled.

If I’m already in an app, I’ve made a conscious decision to open it. That’s a point at which I can be reasonably okay with a nudge to pay for it. Samsung’s approach is the equivalent of forcing me to sit through the ads that run before you even get to the trailers before your feature film in a cinema these days. Nobody likes those. A captive audience is not the same thing as a receptive one.

Andy Meek Trending News Editor

Andy Meek is a reporter based in Memphis who has covered media, entertainment, and culture for over 20 years. His work has appeared in outlets including The Guardian, Forbes, and The Financial Times, and he’s written for BGR since 2015. Andy's coverage includes technology and entertainment, and he has a particular interest in all things streaming.

Over the years, he’s interviewed legendary figures in entertainment and tech that range from Stan Lee to John McAfee, Peter Thiel, and Reed Hastings.

More Tech

Latest News