Apple looking for record industry approval of cloud music service [Updated]

Services

According to Peter Kafka over at All Things D, Apple’s presumed cloud-based music service will not be all that dissimilar from Amazon’s. The report details that Apple, like Amazon, will allow iTunes users to store newly purchased tracks and already-owned digital music in an online locker. Unlike Amazon, however, the Cupertino company is looking for deals with major record labels.“They’ve been very aggressive and thoughtful about it,” said an industry executive speaking with Kafka. “It feels like they want to go pretty soon.” The report also notes that the industry buy-in and licensing will allow Apple to store a single, master copy of a digital music file on its services and share that file with authorized users — making the company’s storage schema much more streamlined. Amazon’s Cloud Drive implementation is based on its S3 storage service and functions more like a cloud-based hard drive — every time a user buys a track it’s uploaded to that specific users online locker. “Sources tell me that Apple has already procured deals from at least two of the big four labels (Universal Music Group, Warner Music Group, Sony and EMI) within the last two months,” writes Kafka. “One source tells me Apple content boss Eddy Cue will be in New York tomorrow to try to finalize remaining deals.” Apple has some experience with cloud-based services as it has offered its MobileMe service — formerly iTools and .Mac — since early 2000.

UPDATE: CNET is now reporting that Apple and Warner Music Group reached a deal this afternoon: “Apple has an agreement with Warner Music Group to offer the record label’s tracks on iTunes’ upcoming cloud-music service.”

Read [All Things D] Read [CNET]

15 Comments
  • Anonymous

    Looks like they’re doing it the right way? Or perhaps there is no precedent for this, and they don’t really need to license.

    • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AR6HpRLyzMY Walter Sobchak

      What is that picture from?

      • Anonymous

        Snickers commercial. Wasn’t that funny, but it’s creepy, so . . .

        I have an iDea. Perhaps Apple will also invent some sort of box that attaches to your TV so that you can stream from your cloud storage.

      • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_GP2WYAHXS6CRUREISWBGPUSUGE Michael

        DEFENSE! (clap-clap) DEFENSE! (clap-clap) DEFENSE! (clap-clap) DEFENSE! (clap-clap)

      • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AR6HpRLyzMY Walter Sobchak

        Ah! That’s what it was.
        Was that David Cross doing the voice?

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_GP2WYAHXS6CRUREISWBGPUSUGE Michael

      DEFENSE! (clap-clap) DEFENSE! (clap-clap) DEFENSE! (clap-clap) DEFENSE! (clap-clap)

      • Anonymous

        Amen to that! Please, Please, Please help me spread the word.

    • http://www.droiddoes.com/ Norm

      Doesn’t matter, Amazon was FIRST! and you can enjoy it all on a DROID and not an iPhone.

      • Anonymous

        Enjoy what? A crappy service that was rushed out to claim FIRST? Enjoy it loser.

      • Cer

        Norm is a flamebait-er.

      • Anonymous

        I will. It works great and I can access my music from anywhere.and guess what I don’t need crappy bloated itunes do everything on my phone. Enjoy being an idiot

  • Anonymous

    If they had pushed through without getting licenses like Amazon did, it would have been boss. I mean, what can the labels do? Pull their music from iTunes? That’s a death sentence.

    Would’ve been nice to see them use this leverage so that everybody could get some awesomeness. Oh, well. More than can be reasonably expected from any corporation.

  • Cer

    Why not just use Rhapsody or another subscription service?

    • Anonymous

      And pay what $10 a month and not have the digital copy anywhere else? No thanks Rhapsody and the fugly girl on your commercials.

      • Cer

        The digital copy is everywhere for 10 bucks a month, and you didn’t pay 99
        cents before you put it in the cloud.

blog comments powered by Disqus