Click to Skip Ad
Closing in...
  1. Smart Lock Amazon
    10:32 Deals

    eufy’s Smart Lock Touch is stunning, and it has one feature you can’t get with…

  2. 4K Camera Drone Amazon
    13:37 Deals

    This pro-grade 4K camera drone is $430 at Amazon, and it beats $800+ rivals

  3. Disney Plus Free
    14:51 Deals

    Hidden Amazon deal gets you 6 months of Disney+ for free

  4. Amazon Deals
    09:51 Deals

    Today’s best deals: Alexa in your car for $19.99, surprise Fire TV Stick 4K sale, $6…

  5. Instant Pot Accessories Amazon
    08:41 Deals

    This $27 Instant Pot accessory kit on Amazon will take your Instant Pot to the next level




HomeScienceNews

Scientists tested shark deterrents and have very bad news for us

March 14th, 2019 at 2:17 PM
shark deterrents

Shark attacks on humans are incredibly rare, but they do still happen from time to time. As with any danger that could potential end your life, companies have developed what they see as solutions to the problem and in this case it’s in the form of electronic shark deterrents that claim to keep the aquatic predators at bay.

Whether or not these kinds of devices actually do anything is the subject of a new study published in PLOS One, and unfortunately it seems that there’s some pretty huge differences depending on which brand you choose.

The researchers tested a commercially available wearable called the Electronic Shark Defense System, or ESDS. Its creators claim that it produces an electrical field that drives sharks away, and it’s designed to be worn around the ankle of a surfer or diver.

To determine just how effective the device is, the researchers tested it against a large population of white sharks in a shark hotspot in South Africa. While the device was active, the team logged nearly 400 “encounters” with over 40 individual sharks. That’s a whole lot, and as the scientists explain in their paper, the frequency of shark encounters was the same whether the device was on or off.

The small bit of good news is that the frequency of shark biting seemed to be less when the ESDS was active, but other aggressive behavior like bumping actually increased, suggesting that it’s not a great option for protection from sharks.

“Given the very short effective range of the ESDSTM and its unreliable deterrent effect, combined with the fact that shark-bite incidents are very rare, it is unlikely that the device would significantly reduce the risk of a negative interaction with a white shark,” Dr. Ryan Kempster, lead researcher, said in a statement.

The team had previously tested another brand of electronic shark deterrent called Shark Shield, and while both it and the ESDS claim to work in a similar manner, the Shark Shield actually proved to be worth its price. The Shark Shield kept sharks at an average distance of around 1.3 meters, the researchers say.

Mike Wehner has reported on technology and video games for the past decade, covering breaking news and trends in VR, wearables, smartphones, and future tech.

Most recently, Mike served as Tech Editor at The Daily Dot, and has been featured in USA Today, Time.com, and countless other web and print outlets. His love of reporting is second only to his gaming addiction.




Popular News