Click to Skip Ad
Closing in...

Judge in Apple patent case says patent system is a mess

Updated Dec 19th, 2018 8:29PM EST
BGR

If you buy through a BGR link, we may earn an affiliate commission, helping support our expert product labs.

Judge Richard Posner, last seen dismissing an Apple-Motorola patent dispute with prejudice

, has added some more thoughts to the current state of the patent system through an interview with Reuters’s Dan Levine. Among other things, Posner questions whether the tech industry even needs software patents at all in order to thrive. According to Levine, Posner thinks that tech companies don’t have as strong a claim as other industries to having patents since “advances in software and other industries cost much less” than, say, research and development for pharmaceuticals. What’s more, Posner believes tech companies that are first to market with important new innovations will get richly rewarded for their work even if other companies work to copy them shortly after. Finally, Posner contends that there are so many components to smartphone technology that having each individual feature such as a slide-to-unlock system patented simply clogs the courts with endless litigation that doesn’t benefit consumers or the industry. “It’s not clear that we really need patents in most industries,” Judge Posner said.

Read

Brad Reed
Brad Reed Staff Writer

Brad Reed has written about technology for over eight years at BGR.com and Network World. Prior to that, he wrote freelance stories for political publications such as AlterNet and the American Prospect. He has a Master's Degree in Business and Economics Journalism from Boston University.