Click to Skip Ad
Closing in...
  1. Prime Day Deals
    07:58 Deals

    Amazon has 10 new early Prime Day deals you need to see to believe

  2. Best Kitchen Gadgets
    08:33 Deals

    Amazon shoppers are obsessed with this $23 gadget that should be in every kitchen

  3. Amazon Echo Auto Price
    09:43 Deals

    Amazon’s $50 Echo Auto adds Alexa to your car – today it’s only $15

  4. Amazon Gift Card
    07:58 Deals

    $25 in free Amazon credit beats any Prime Day deal – here’s how to get it

  5. Amazon Deals
    10:18 Deals

    Today’s best deals: Early Prime Day deals, $15 Echo Auto, $4 smart plugs, $50 off Ai…




3 most important things you need to know about the FBI’s war with Apple

Zach Epstein
March 15th, 2016 at 10:06 AM
FBI Vs Apple

In early December last year, two terrorists carried out an horrific mass shooting in San Bernardino, California. The attack at the Inland Regional Center left 14 dead and another 22 seriously injured. It’s difficult to think that anyone might look to impede the investigation into this horrible atrocity, let alone have good reasons to do so, but the nation is torn as it looks on while the FBI and Apple duke it out over a locked iPhone that was recovered from one of the shooters. The FBI is demanding that Apple assist with the investigation, but Apple is refusing because of the precedent it would set.

A court has issued an order requiring Apple to provide the FBI with tools that would allow it to break into the recovered iPhone more easily, but Apple has appealed the decision and will soon make its case. But does the American public really understand what the FBI is asking for and why it’s so dangerous?

UP NEXT: Our first look at the iPhone 7 couldn’t be less exciting (and why that’s OK)

This is a very serious issue with compelling arguments on both sides, and the world has been following along quite closely. It’s also a complex matter though, and it’s easy to lose sight of the big picture.

Here are the three most important things you need to know before Apple and the FBI take their fight to court next week:

What exactly does the FBI want?

This is obviously a key piece of the puzzle, but many people don’t fully understand what the FBI is looking for in this case. The Bureau isn’t just asking for help to unlock the iPhone in question, it wants Apple to create a special unsecure version of its iOS operating system that would let the FBI break into the phone, and then hand that software over to the FBI.

This, of course, is very dangerous.

We all want the FBI to be able to carry out its investigation into the San Bernardino shootings. And of course the iPhone in question may have information that could assist the FBI, or perhaps even lead to other suspects who might look to carry out other attacks in the future.

But if we have learned anything from the Snowden leaks, it’s that we simply can’t trust government agencies with tools like these. Sure, using them to access a terrorist’s iPhone is logical. But who draws the line? Where is it drawn? Who ensures that the FBI doesn’t cross it? And of course, what happens when that software inevitably falls into the wrong hands?

Are there other options?

Long story short, there are ways that Apple could assist with the investigation that aren’t anywhere near as dangerous as creating the custom iOS version the FBI is asking for.

In a guest article contributed to BGR by legendary iPhone hacker Will Strafach, we learned that it contrary to what some have suggested, it would be fairly easy for Apple to unlock the iPhone in question. But Apple doesn’t have to build tools for the FBI. Instead, the company could take supervised possession of the iPhone, build a special version of its software, upload it and unlock the phone, and then destroy the software.

The article is fascinating and everyone should take some time to read it. Of course, that takes us to item No. 3.

The precedent

Many people believe that this is simply a line we can’t afford to cross. If Apple can be forced to unlock this phone, what’s to stop the government from making more requests in the future? This is not a one-time deal and future cases won’t be so cut and dry. We know Syed Rizwan Farook was a terrorist, but an FBI victory in this case sets a dangerous precedent — no one knows where the line will be drawn.

Zach Epstein

Zach Epstein has worked in and around ICT for more than 15 years, first in marketing and business development with two private telcos, then as a writer and editor covering business news, consumer electronics and telecommunications. Zach’s work has been quoted by countless top news publications in the US and around the world. He was also recently named one of the world's top-10 “power mobile influencers” by Forbes, as well as one of Inc. Magazine's top-30 Internet of Things experts.




Popular News