Click to Skip Ad
Closing in...

Stephen Hawking challenges everything we thought we knew about black holes

Published Aug 26th, 2015 11:15PM EDT
BGR

If you buy through a BGR link, we may earn an affiliate commission, helping support our expert product labs.

Those of us who were raised on science fiction shows and books know that black holes are something to be avoided since they will inevitably suck your spaceship into an infinitely dense void from which nothing — not even light — can escape. However, physicist Stephen Hawking has proposed a new theory about black holes that suggests they not be as all-powerful as we once thought, although you still would never want fly into one.

RELATED: Stephen Hawking uses theoretical physics to comfort heartbroken One Direction fans

New Scientist reports that Hawking this week told an audience at a public lecture in Stockholm, Sweden that “if you feel you are in a black hole, don’t give up… there’s a way out.”

What is Hawking talking about, exactly? One thing astrophysicists have been debating for decades is exactly what happens to objects when they fall into a black hole. Quantum mechanics tells us that matter cannot be destroyed but New Scientist says that the general theory of relativity suggests otherwise when it comes to entering black holes.

Hawking, however, has figured out a way to resolve this seeming paradox: He doesn’t think matter ever actually enters a black hole but instead stays in the event horizon that surrounds the perimeter of the black hole.

“I propose that the information is stored not in the interior of the black hole as one might expect, but on its boundary, the event horizon,” he said. “The information about ingoing particles [in the event horizon] is returned, but in a chaotic and useless form. This resolves the information paradox. For all practical purposes, the information is lost.”

To read about this  wild theory in more detail, check out New Scientist’s full article here.

Brad Reed
Brad Reed Staff Writer

Brad Reed has written about technology for over eight years at BGR.com and Network World. Prior to that, he wrote freelance stories for political publications such as AlterNet and the American Prospect. He has a Master's Degree in Business and Economics Journalism from Boston University.