Click to Skip Ad
Closing in...
  1. Early Prime Day Deals
    08:06 Deals

    10 incredible early Prime Day deals that are about to end at Amazon

  2. AirPods Pro Prime Day Deal
    11:46 Deals

    AirPods Pro are back in stock at Amazon after selling out – and they’re $52 off

  3. Best Prime Day Apple Deals
    12:00 Deals

    Amazon Prime Day 2021: Best Apple deals

  4. Amazon Deals
    07:56 Deals

    10 deals you don’t want to miss on Saturday: Early Prime Day blowout, $50 off AirPods Max, $20 Blink Mini cam, more

  5. Best Prime Day Phone Deals
    18:12 Deals

    Best Prime Day phone deals: Apple iPhone, Samsung Galaxy and more




How Gawker completely disgusted everyone on the Internet

July 17th, 2015 at 7:45 AM
How Gawker Helps Blackmailers

Gossip website Gawker regularly walks the fine line between entertaining, edgy content and completely unethical, sleazy trash. On Thursday, the website went way, way over that line by helping a blackmailer take revenge against a non-public figure because that person declined to abuse their power on the blackmailer’s behalf.

FROM EARLIER: Specs leak for a mystery LG phone – could it be the 2015 Nexus 5?

I will not link to the Gawker report itself because I don’t want them to be rewarded for aiding blackmailers. However, PinkNews has a pretty good summary of what they did.

Essentially, Gawker outed the CFO of a rival media company, who is married with three children, after he allegedly solicited a male escort. The reason that the escort ratted out the executive to Gawker was because the exec refused to use his political connections to help the escort out with a housing dispute.

So to sum up: An escort tried to use an executive’s political connections to get a favor. The executive declined to help them, which was a good thing. In an act of revenge, the escort went to Gawker with the dirt and the publication was all too happy to oblige.

In this crazy area of modern online media when everyone is scrambling around competing for page views, plenty of questionable stories get run that probably shouldn’t be. That said, some standards still need to apply to anything you decide to publish, particularly when you’re writing about a non-public figure.

So how did Gawker editor-in-chief Max Read justify publishing this article? Like this:

https://twitter.com/max_read/status/621855300509925376

And, I mean, come on. If this escort had come to you with dirt on the CFO of Gawker Media sleeping around, there is no way in hell you would have published that. The only reason you did so was because it was the CFO of a rival company and to pretend that you just did us all a great public service for it makes me throw up in my mouth.




Popular News