Purported Steve Jobs email suggests Netflix, others safe from Apple’s subscription rules

General

Could all the recent hoopla stirred up by Apple’s decision to enforce its existing App Store subscription policies be much ado about nothing? Earlier this month, Apple announced that its new App Store subscription service became available to all publishers. In a related note prior to that announcement, Apple noted that it would begin cracking down on content providers who had been skirting a rule stipulating all apps providing links to Web-based content purchases must also make the same content available using Apple’s in-app purchase mechanism — therefor forcing them to cough up Apple’s 30% cut. As a result, developers were enraged. Apple’s typically unclear wording left each developer guessing as to whether or not it might be affected by the policy. Some publicly jumped to conclusions while others went further still and announced that they would abandon iOS all together. One developer recently decided to email Apple CEO Steve Jobs and inquire about the matter, however, and claims to have received a response. Both emails are found after the break.

Hello Steve,

As a full time iOS developer, I am concerned (and confused) withe the new App Store guideline regarding “Apps offering subscriptions” (section 11.12).

Most of the iOS apps I have developed, as a contractor for other businesses, have been free apps that had login screens to allow the user access to some amount of private data. and/or service. These businesses have all been well established companies that sell some kind of service to their customers (Software As a Service companies) and the iOS app was merely another “portal” for their users to access their data/services (in many times, in a limited i.e. “mobile” fashion)…. for example; SalesForce. I am concerned that most of these businesses will choose to not develop an iOS app for their customers if the IAP & subscription policy was in place.

Would these type’s of free apps be still be allowed in the App Store or will they now be expected to use IAP?

Steve Jobs’ alleged response:

We created subscriptions for publishing apps, not SaaS apps.

Sent from my iPhone

Jobs’ purported response is still a bit vague but it does indicate that Apple intends to enforce this rule for “publishing apps” and not Saftware as a Service (SaaS) apps such as Dropbox or Netflix, which allow users to purchase a subscription service and not published content.

Read

26 Comments
  • Ricky

    “Sent from my iPhone” That’s probably Jobs’ Outlook signature. :)

  • Cmboud

    What?? I am more confused now!

  • Anonymous

    So, in other words… Amazon is still fucked?

    • Anonymous

      Nope, they can still sell their product through other outlets. Apple isn’t keeping anyone from going somewhere else to move their product.

      Apple’s store, Apple’s rules.

      • David

        What??? How does one install a “product” on an iOS device, if not through the App Store? (forget jailbreaking).

  • Tim242

    I smell legal action.

    • Anonymous

      Why? Last I checked it is Apple’s store. Apple isn’t preventing these products from being sold through other outlets.

      No one can make Apple change their store policies. It is Apple’s store, their rules and as long as they make everyone follow the rules that apply to their specific Applications then Apple can get into absolutely no trouble……..NONE.

      Next you are going to tell me that Macy’s has to sell clothes at the same prices as Wal-Mart right.

      Your comment suggests that you understand nothing in regards to business or capitalism.

      • Tim242

        Your analogy doesn’t match. They are requiring that 30% of in app
        subscription sales be paid to apple. On top of that, they are not allowed to
        markup the price to pay for it, unless they raise the price for everyone,
        including those that don’t even use apple products. Raising their prices
        will hurt their sales. Apple cannot dictate the pricing and policies of
        other companies. Lawsuits are on the way from several companies.

      • Anonymous

        Apple is basically charging commission. Imagine a hair salon. If you are going to style hair hair (develop apps) in a hair salon (iOS), then you have to pay rent per week (per sale) and per haircut (published material) on a percentage. Some salons charge stylists as much as 50%.

      • Tim242

        But, the salons are free to charge whatever they choose. A more appropriate
        analagy would be the Salon having a lease increase on their space, but
        unanle to charge more for services to make it up. You people will go to any
        lengths to defend apple’s shit. They will pay…apple that is.

      • http://twitter.com/cadiente Ivan C.

        This doesn’t even make sense. The problem is that they are using their influence as the leading mobile media device manufacturer to influence the price and distribution of someone else’s product for their own gain. Apple can charge what they want as a fee for reselling but they shouldn’t be able to control how much or where else they sell their product.

      • Cmboud

        yes the government can make them “change their policy” if they judge that the practice is unfair. Thats why the FCC i is looking into it, if not why waste their time?

  • http://jamieei.org JamieEi

    What about the Sony ebook store? That’s retailing, not publishing, and they got banned based on this rule.

  • http://twitter.com/ChazClout ChazClout

    Why don’t they just clarify it better in a concise press release instead of this vague crap? A lot of the ranting is probalby down to the confusion on this issue.

    • Anonymous

      If they were more concise then they could not randomly turn down applications or blackmail developers.

  • Freddy Huerta

    Steve is alive !!

  • until I change my mind

    Not for SaaS. . . until I change my mind.

  • Anonymous

    I think your assumption that Netflix is SaaS is questionable. It’s a subscription that lets you access third party content, which is not at all the same thing. Here I think Apple defines publishing as “things that look like print and anything that competes with our own existing or planned services.”

  • Anonymous

    If a magazine sells their monthly articles individually as a separate app that would be great. I buy a magazine only to read a few articles. Even the writers who write monthly column can just sell their monthly columns directly via the app store.

  • http://justinpaine.com xxdesmus

    Apple is just making up the rules as they go … tomorrow will be a different responses/story from them I’m sure. They are just backtracking on a BS “policy at this point.

  • http://twitter.com/cadiente Ivan C.

    “We created subscriptions …” really? next they’ll be telling you that they created music.

    • Ultraseven32

      dont be a heater…. they didn’t created music for sure but they recreated how to sell music. before u had to buy a full cd and there’s was only one or two songs worthy it on. come on….

      • Ultraseven32

        i meant HATER – u know…

  • http://twitter.com/zc456 Squeaks

    Could their policies be anymore vague?

  • Steve

    you loser!!!

  • Steve

    you know nothing about crap!!!!!!

blog comments powered by Disqus