Click to Skip Ad
Closing in...
  1. Best Amazon Finds Under $30
    08:33 Deals

    10 Amazon finds under $30 each that people are obsessed with right now

  2. AirPods Max Amazon
    11:49 Deals

    AirPods Max just hit a new all-time low at Amazon (cheaper than Prime Day!)

  3. Amazon Soundbar Deals
    12:59 Deals

    This best-selling soundbar is somehow down to $39 at Amazon

  4. Best PlayStation 5 Accessories
    15:17 Deals

    Have a video game console? This $48 device on Amazon makes it feel so much faster

  5. Amazon Deals
    10:37 Deals

    Today’s top deals: Free $15 Amazon credit, AirPods Pro back on sale, $39 soundbar, $…




Comcast wants to charge you for privacy or sell your browsing history to advertisers

August 4th, 2016 at 2:40 PM
Why Is Comcast So Bad

As if there weren’t enough reasons to hate internet service providers, Comcast is giving you a brand new one. The company wants to be able to charge you more to better protect your privacy, or offer you cheaper plans as long as it’s able to sell your data to advertisers. And by data, we mean all of your browsing history, which is something most people go out of their way to guard.

DON’T MISS: Leaked video shows a real iPhone 7 in action for the first time ever

Comcast on Monday met with the FCC to discuss the matter, The Washington Post notes.

“A bargained-for exchange of information for service is a perfectly acceptable and widely used model throughout the U.S. economy, including the Internet ecosystem,” Comcast wrote in a regulatory filing, after meeting the Commission.

And Comcast might not be wrong seeing as others already do it, including competitors like AT&T. The company is one of Comcast’s main rivals and has a special deal on broadband prices for customers who agree to let the carrier track their entire web browsing histories.

But while it might be fine for Google, Facebook, Amazon and others to harvest your personal data to offer you free services or other products in return, having an ISP share all of your browsing data with advertisers might be worrying, even if said data is anonymized.

It also sounds rather counterintuitive to hear an ISP ask you for more money just to guard your privacy, something it should do by default. Unless this is a ploy to simply hike prices and collect more cash in monthly fees to make up for lost revenue. And isn’t it expensive to deploy privacy-breaking technology that tracks and collects huge amounts of data, technology that protects databases containing said data, and technology that serves ads based on browsing history?

Unlike any other company that tracks you online, an ISP can see everything you’re doing, not just data that’s limited to the scope of a site’s cookies. So in time, it could collect a tremendous and frightening amount of information about you, which needs to be hosted somewhere.

The FCC should finalize its privacy rules for ISPs later this year, which will clarify under what terms these companies will be able to sell your data to third parties.

Chris Smith started writing about gadgets as a hobby, and before he knew it he was sharing his views on tech stuff with readers around the world. Whenever he's not writing about gadgets he miserably fails to stay away from them, although he desperately tries. But that's not necessarily a bad thing.




Popular News