Click to Skip Ad
Closing in...
  1. Best Amazon Finds Under $30
    08:33 Deals

    10 Amazon finds under $30 each that people are obsessed with right now

  2. AirPods Max Amazon
    11:49 Deals

    AirPods Max just hit a new all-time low at Amazon (cheaper than Prime Day!)

  3. Best PlayStation 5 Accessories
    15:17 Deals

    Have a video game console? This $48 device on Amazon makes it feel so much faster

  4. Wireless Borescope Camera
    13:49 Deals

    Crazy wireless camera that lets your phone see anywhere is still down to $29 at Amazon

  5. Soundbar With Alexa
    16:27 Deals

    Anker’s soundbar with built-in Fire TV streaming and Alexa has never been cheaper at…

People are suing Apple over ‘Batterygate’ for the wrong reason

December 22nd, 2017 at 6:50 AM
iPhone Battery Scandal

Apple thought it fixed the battery problems some iPhone 6 and iPhone 6s users encountered last year by throttling their processors. By slowing them down, Apple made sure that iPhones with older batteries would not suddenly die.

That’s one temporary fix for a battery that’s getting older, and it’s understandable why Apple did it. The fact that Apple did it quietly, without actually informing users about it, is what’s so annoying about it. It’s misleading and offensive, and we shouldn’t be surprised to hear that two class action suits have already been filed against the company.

However, some people might be suing the iPhone maker for the wrong reason.

The first suit was filed in Los Angeles, CBS reports. The lawsuit alleges breach of implied contract “by purposefully slowing down older iPhone models when new models come out and by failing to properly disclose that at the time that the parties entered into an agreement.”

Curiously, the lawsuit lists the iPhone 7s among the devices affected. There’s no such device.

A second suit was filed on Thursday, by five affected iPhone users from Illinois, Ohio, Indiana, and North Caroline, according to The Chicago Sun Time.

The plaintiffs say Apple’s iOS updates “were engineered to purposefully slow down or ‘throttle down’ the performance speeds” of various iPhone models, including iPhone 5, iPhone 6 and iPhone 7.

They say Apple’s actions are “deceptive, immoral, and unethical,” arguing that Apple is violating consumer protection laws. While that might be true, saying that Apple “needlessly subjects consumers to purchasing newer and more expensive iPhones when a replacement battery could have allowed consumers to continue to use their older iPhones,” is a false narrative.

It’s already proven that battery replacements fix the throttling issue. And Apple offers in-store battery replacements for $79, while some iPhone 6s units qualify for free replacements.

Also, if you’re going to sue Apple, don’t go at it with a conspiracy theory that’s been proven to be wrong for years.

Yes, Apple’s decision to quietly throttle iPhone performance is wrong, and the company could have done a much better job informing users about this fix. But you’re mistaken if you think Apple has done it to force you to buy a new iPhone, or that it prevented you in any way to replace your iPhone’s battery.

That said, Apple is solely responsible for these lawsuits, and it’s likely we’ll see more class actions against the company for this unexpected #Batterygate scandal.

Chris Smith started writing about gadgets as a hobby, and before he knew it he was sharing his views on tech stuff with readers around the world. Whenever he's not writing about gadgets he miserably fails to stay away from them, although he desperately tries. But that's not necessarily a bad thing.

Popular News