Click to Skip Ad
Closing in...
  1. Mattress Topper Amazon
    14:52 Deals

    35,000 Amazon shoppers gave this mattress topper 5 stars – get one for $34 today

  2. Amazon Deals
    07:55 Deals

    10 deals you don’t want to miss on Saturday: Alexa in your car for $19.99, $200 Chro…

  3. Amazon Echo Auto Price
    13:16 Deals

    Add hands-free Alexa to your car for $19.99 with this Amazon deal

  4. Amazon Gift Card Promotion
    11:46 Deals

    How you can get $15 from Amazon right now for free

  5. MacBook Pro 2021 Price
    16:34 Deals

    Amazon slashed $200 off Apple’s M1 MacBook Pro, or get a MacBook Air for $899

WikiLeaks changes domain name, moves to Switzerland

December 3rd, 2010 at 7:31 AM

After being ousted by Amazon’s Web Services, the controversial site WikiLeaks has run into another snafu, this time with its DNS provider, Via a statement, EveryDns stated that due to “interference issues” that are affecting the service of others, the company has ceased resolving; the service was provided to WikiLeaks for free. In response to the DNS shutdown, WikiLeaks tweeted the following message:

WIKILEAKS: Free speech has a number:

In a subsequent tweet, the company then announced that it had moved to Switzerland; the site’s new domain name is now

A very vocal opponent of the WikiLeaks cable publishings has been the Independent Senator from Connecticut, Joe Lieberman. The Senator has introduced legislation, dubbed the SHIELD (Securing Human Intelligence and Enforcing Lawful Dissemination) Act, that would make it illegal to publish information “concerning the human intelligence activities of the United States or any foreign government” or information relating to “a classified source or informant.” We have to wonder where Sen. Lieberman’s legislation was when CIA operative Valerie Plame was outed. No word on when the new legislation will hit the Senate floor.

Meanwhile, Amazon has released a statement stating that the reason for its removal of WikiLeaks’ data from its AWS servers was not a result of denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks or government pressure, but rather the fact that the site did not operate within Amazon’s terms of service.

Read [Tweet 1] Read [Tweet 2] Read [SHIELD Act]

Popular News