Click to Skip Ad
Closing in...
  1. Amazon Gift Card Promotion
    14:41 Deals

    Amazon’s giving away $15 credits, but this is your last chance to get one

  2. Control Garage Door With iPhone
    08:10 Deals

    Unreal deal gets you Amazon’s hottest smart home gadget for $23 – plus a $40 c…

  3. Best Memory Foam Mattress
    12:31 Deals

    When 75,000 Amazon shoppers rave about a $130 memory foam mattress, you need to check it o…

  4. Self-Emptying Robot Vacuum
    16:11 Deals

    Amazon coupon slashes our favorite self-emptying robot vacuum to its lowest price ever

  5. Best Amazon Finds 2021
    08:49 Deals

    5 must-have Amazon devices you might’ve never even heard of




Despite Photographer’s Charges, It Looks Like Taylor Swift isn’t a Hypocrite for Shaming Apple Music

June 23rd, 2015 at 8:30 PM
Taylor Swift Apple Music Photographer

Taylor Swift beat Apple over the weekend by convincing the giant corporation to change its tune on paying royalties to artists during users’ free three-month trial period. But this opened up Swift to charges of hypocrisy from a photographer who claimed that her photography contracts made it almost impossible to get paid for taking pictures at her concerts. Unlike Swift’s powerful letter though, the photographer’s request wasn’t as successful.

DON’T MISS: Mammoth Study Finds Sprint’s 4G Network is the Worst – And It’s Not Even Close

Swift’s camp responded this week to the photographer’s charges and said that he had misrepresented Swift’s photo contracts.

The photographer in question said that the contracts her team promotes exploit photographers just as Apple would have exploited musicians whose work would go unpaid when streamed by an Apple Music customer during the three-month free trial period. He highlighted the fact that the contracts says that photographers can only license a photo of Swift to a single publication, and he wouldn’t be able to sell the image to anyone else if that publication decided against running that story.

A U.K. representative for Swift told Business Insider that the standard photography agreement Sheldon mentioned has been “misrepresented.”

According to Swift’s spokesperson, the contract “clearly states that any photographer shooting The 1989 World Tour has the opportunity for further use of said photographs with management’s approval.”

“Another distinct misrepresentation is the claim that the copyright of the photographs will be with anyone other than the photographer — this agreement does not transfer copyright away from the photographer,” the person said. “Every artist has the right to and should protect the use of their name and likeness.”

Chris Smith started writing about gadgets as a hobby, and before he knew it he was sharing his views on tech stuff with readers around the world. Whenever he's not writing about gadgets he miserably fails to stay away from them, although he desperately tries. But that's not necessarily a bad thing.




Popular News