Click to Skip Ad
Closing in...
  1. Best Selling Drones Amazon
    13:27 Deals

    Amazon has a $59 drone you can control with gestures or just your voice

  2. How To Save Money On Your Cable Bill
    11:47 Deals

    Make your cable company furious and save $120/year with this $56 Amazon purchase

  3. Best Alexa Devices
    08:06 Deals

    Amazon’s hottest smart home gadget is down to $19 today – and you can get a $4…

  4. Kitchen Storage Solutions
    08:41 Deals

    How did you ever live without this brilliant $40 Amazon find in your kitchen?

  5. Amazon Gift Card Promotion
    11:46 Deals

    How you can get $15 from Amazon right now for free




American Bar Association’s top design patent expert says Samsung is toast

August 13th, 2012 at 1:00 PM

InformationWeek on Monday caught up with Christopher Carani, chairman of the American Bar Association’s design rights committee and former chair of the American Intellectual Property Law Association committee on industrial design, to get his take on the Samsung (005930) vs. Apple (AAPL) patent trial. And so far, he says that based on what he’s seen, he thinks Samsung is in serious trouble.

Carani in particular notes that Judge Lucy Koh has remarked that the Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 is “virtually indistinguishable” from the iPad, and says that Samsung has not shown any significant evidence to contradict her assertion.

“Judge Koh appears to be of the mindset that the accused Samsung tablet easily meets the ‘substantially the same’ infringement standard — so much so that the facts lead to one and only one conclusion — infringement,”Carani told InformationWeek.

Carani said that Samsung could save itself if it can produce some significant prior art indicating that Apple’s tablet design isn’t wholly original. However, he says that Samsung didn’t produce its best prior art evidence during the pretrial evidence discovery process, and that Samsung isn’t likely to introduce any persuasive evidence at this time.

“Samsung failed to disclose these [prior art] designs in a timely manner prior to the court’s discovery deadlines,” he said. “We don’t know why they missed the deadlines.”

Read




Popular News