Click to Skip Ad
Closing in...

Appeals Court chops $382M off of Samsung’s penalty for copying the iPhone

Updated Dec 19th, 2018 9:00PM EST
Apple Vs Samsung
Image: Apple

If you buy through a BGR link, we may earn an affiliate commission, helping support our expert product labs.

Back in 2012, the entire tech world was captivated by Apple and Samsung’s patent trial. One of the things that made the trial so interesting is that it lifted the veil of secrecy that typically shrouds Apple’s operations, providing us with unprecedented access to the company’s development process, market research methodology, and even photos of unreleased iPhone prototypes.

As for the merits of the case itself, Apple would ultimately emerge victorious, with a jury awarding Apple $930 million in damages. But as with any court ruling, especially one with nearly a billion dollars on the line, Samsung has busied itself with filing all sorts of appeals looking to have the ruling overturned, or at the very least, the damages amount reduced.

DON’T MISS: This hidden iPhone feature lets you perform one of 6 secret functions in an instant

Earlier today, the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals issued a ruling which effectively lowers how much Samsung will have to fork over to Apple. While the court found that Samsung did infringe upon Apple’s design and utility patents, it found that Samsung did not, in fact, violate Apple’s trade dress. The ‘trade dress’ term, as it pertains to this case, refers to the distinct manner in which the iPhone and iPad are packaged and presented to end users. It also covers some of the broader aspects of product design, such as having a dock at the bottom of the display or icons featuring rounded corners.

With the trade dress portion of the original judgement now out of the equation, the damages amount needs to be re-calibrated.

On that note, Bloomberg writes:

According to a Samsung court filing, the portion of the damage award that will be tossed is $382 million, leaving $548 million that the Suwon, South Korea-based company would potentially have to pay to Apple.

The full decision can be read below.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruling on Apple v. Samsung

Yoni Heisler Contributing Writer

Yoni Heisler has been writing about Apple and the tech industry at large with over 15 years of experience. A life long expert Mac user and Apple expert, his writing has appeared in Edible Apple, Network World, MacLife, Macworld UK, and TUAW.

When not analyzing the latest happenings with Apple, Yoni enjoys catching Improv shows in Chicago, playing soccer, and cultivating new TV show addictions.