Click to Skip Ad
Closing in...
  1. Amazon Gift Card Promotion
    14:41 Deals

    Amazon’s giving away $15 credits, but this is your last chance to get one

  2. Best Memory Foam Mattress
    12:31 Deals

    When 75,000 Amazon shoppers rave about a $130 memory foam mattress, you need to check it o…

  3. Control Garage Door With iPhone
    08:10 Deals

    Unreal deal gets you Amazon’s hottest smart home gadget for $23 – plus a $40 c…

  4. Self-Emptying Robot Vacuum
    16:11 Deals

    Amazon coupon slashes our favorite self-emptying robot vacuum to its lowest price ever

  5. Best Amazon Finds 2021
    08:49 Deals

    5 must-have Amazon devices you might’ve never even heard of

Washington state is suing Comcast for $100 million for lying to customers

August 1st, 2016 at 6:00 PM
Comcast Lawsuit

Comcast is the most-hated brand in the US, and its slippery marketing tactics and bullshit charges are well known to the entire Western world. But nothing ever gets done, because Comcast is (mostly) a monopoly and people love internet more than they hate Comcast.

But as it happens, the government can (and should!) deal with monopolists that abuse their power, especially by bare-faced lying to customers. That’s exactly what Washington state has done: it has filed a $100 million lawsuit against Comcast for “engaging in a pattern of deceptive practices” that ended up costing customers tens of millions of dollars.

DON’T MISS: What if the iPhone 8’s screen is even more durable than Gorilla Glass 5?

There’s many, many things that I think Comcast could be sued for, but this lawsuit focuses on one thing in particular: Comcast’s Service Protection Plan, a $5-a-month plan that supposedly covers all Comcast technician visits.

An investigation by the Washington Attorney General’s Office discovered that Comcast reps would tell customers that inside wiring was covered, for example, but then would charge customers for any inside wiring during a service call. They also found that when Comcast equipment (say, a rental modem) failed, customers would still be charged for the technician visit, in violation of the “Comcast Guarantee.”

Oh, and as the cherry on the cake, the investigation also found “thousands of instances of improper credit screening by Comcast, unnecessarily impacting the credit reports of those customers.” Thanks, Comcast.

In all, the lawsuit is seeking:

“• More than $73 million in restitution to pay back Service Protection Plan subscriber payments;

• Full restitution for all service calls that applied an improper resolution code, estimated to be at least $1 million;

• Removal of improper credit checks from the credit reports of more than 6,000 customers;

• Up to $2,000 per violation of the Consumer Protection Act; and

• That Comcast clearly disclose the limitations of its Service Protection Plan in advertising and through its representatives, correct improper service codes that should not be chargeable and implement a compliance procedure for improper customer credit checks.”

Godspeed, Washington Attorney General, and may the Force be with you.

Popular News