Android 4.0 ‘still not strong enough’ to compete with iPad, vendors fear

Tablets

Google unveiled Android 4.0 Ice Cream Sandwich alongside the Galaxy Nexus earlier this week and while initial responses have been fairly positive, vendors reportedly believe Google’s new OS lacks the innovation needed to bolster Android tablet sales. According to a report from industry watcher DigiTimes, tablet vendors were put off by Google’s focus on the Galaxy Nexus and smartphones during the unveiling of Android 4.0, fearing that the tech giant’s balance of resource distribution between handsets and tablets may begin favoring the former. The site’s anonymous sources say Android 4.0 features several improvements but it is “still not  strong enough to help Android tablet PCs compete against iPad 2.” With Apple set to launch the iPad 3 as soon as March of next year according to the report, Google’s tablet-focused Android partners are said to be afraid “the technology gap between Android tablet PCs and iPad may expand further.” The report says several vendors are banking on Windows 8 rather than Android to help them gain consumer market share and mind share.

Read

163 Comments
  • http://twitter.com/starnovsky Stan Tarnovsky

    I think this article badly formulated. It’s not like Androd is behind iOS in any way on tablets. Android is technically superior to iOS is pretty much every way. The problem is however that users don’t care much about this superiority. Users doesn’t care about OS underpinnings, they care about apps and hardware quality. With a competitive price and a huge app selection iPad is an obvious choice for a consumer and I don’t know what it would take for other OEMs to dethrone it. The problem is that Apple priced iPad really competitively.

  • Anonymous

    I truly hate ready drivel like this. Seriously now. “vendors reportedly believe Google’s new OS lacks the innovation needed to bolster Android tablet sales”. “Vendors”. That’s like watching Fox News and hearing people report that “some say” Barack Obama is a Muslim. “Some people think” evolution isn’t real. “Some might argue” the US never landed on the moon. 

    Regardless, Google’s OS is never at a loss for innovation. Are they at a loss for apps? Sure. Do vendors need to rethink their price structures? Absolutely. Cloud storage. Universal messaging. Streaming music player. Turn by turn directions. Voice command. All was there in previous versions. Now they bring even more “innovation” to the table with ICS. Innovation is not the problem that “vendors” are facing.

  • Anonymous

    If Windows 8 on ARM has the wide peripheral support and ease of installation/IT support/software install that Windows users are accustomed to, expect it to win. 

  • Kunal Sharma

    Google should have made a nexus tablet to silence these analyst. 

  • Madeinmanhattan

    Perhaps we shouldn’t worry about who is winning the war for a transitional product that is not quite good enough to be a true computing unit, and too big to enter the phone market.  When the Tablets reach a non-retarded-pc status of performance then we can discuss “winners” and “losers.”  Until then, Tablets won’t make a company sink or swim, so there are no real winners or losers, everyone can play.

  • Anonymous

    I just rather buy an Apple.  I hate the other tablet makers. Just cuz they are copy cats.

  • Anonymous

    All I know, is that once Siri comes to the iPad 2, it’s all over.
    So, you’ve about a month. Maybe less.

  • http://twitter.com/Tryn2Bbrief Martian Ambassador

    The tablet market and the phone market have almost nothing in common.

    Tablets are not subsidized by carriers, so the consumer carries the entire purchase price. Millions of people elect to spend discretionary income on the iPad2 every month. They are not choosing the Android product in any meaningful numbers.

    It’s also funny to see anyone touting Android “technological superiority.” Android will get quad cores first no doubt because they NEED them to offset their crummy hardware optimization, which is mostly reflected in their laggy graphical response and suckish battery performance to date.

    There is nothing technologically superior about needing more virtual horsepower to keep up with purpose built devices that don’t require the hardware overhead in the first place.

    Curiously, WP7.5 is a comparative race car on lighter spec hardware too.

  • dario69

    Yup.  Makes sense.  Wife asked to use the Samsung Tab 10.1 versus iPad but the Tab’s battery somehow drained from 60% to zero overnight.  She went back to the iPad.  Old reliable.

    No custom roms, just stock mind you.  Android is not ready to compete.  And anyone that says to load a custom rom just doesn’t get it.  Compete means to compete without manipulation.  I feel like Google is using as a lab rats sometimes.

  • Anonymous

    Oh yeah, Apple doesnt have a thing to worry about, that is for sure.
    Privacy-Net.tk

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_F4B7C44MLOJ2GR5JBYBRCIQJUE Skylinetd04

    i dont care…

1 2 3
blog comments powered by Disqus