U.S. emerges as global 4G LTE leader after less than a year

mobile

A country that was recently the butt of jokes due to its ongoing reliance on CDMA networks now finds itself a global leader in next-generation cellular technology. According to a new report from Pyramid Research, the United States will account for the largest share of 4G LTE subscriptions in the world this year. Twenty-six carriers around the globe have launched LTE networks thus far according to the GSA, but just three will account for 47% of all LTE connections in 2011: Verizon Wireless, MetroPCS and AT&T. Read on for more.

Pyramid analyst Emily Smith estimates that U.S. carriers will be responsible for 7 million of the 14.9 million LTE subscriptions expected around the world this year. The analyst sees U.S. sales of devices with embedded LTE radios topping 5.4 million units in 2011 to represent 71% of global LTE device sales, and she attributes much of LTE’s success here to Verizon’s rapid deployment. Smith also says the strong demand in the U.S. for mobile broadband will allow Verizon Wireless to recoup its LTE investments more quickly than other carriers around the world.

Smith uses NTT Docomo as a basis for comparison, noting that both carriers launched their LTE networks in December 2010. “Although Verizon’s LTE network will cover 60% of the population by year end, because the operator is pulling in so much revenue, capex only represented 14.7% of revenue over the past four quarters,” Smith wrote on Pyramid’s blog. “By comparison, NTT Docomo will cover a mere 20% of the Japanese population with LTE by March 2012, even though capex represented a larger 15.8% of revenue in the year ending March 2011.”

Comparison of leading operators in the US, Japan, and South Korea

Source: Pyramid Research

Verizon Wireless first launched 4G LTE service in 38 cities on December 5th, 2010. The carrier announced this past Monday that it will offer LTE coverage in a total of 178 U.S. cities by November 17th of this year.

Read

22 Comments
  • http://twitter.com/dimeloloco Marcel Velazquez

    About time.

  • Anonymous

    Reading this from UK makes me very Changry. Not getting 4G till 2014:(

  • http://twitter.com/ggore Glenn Gore

    CDMA is still the best method and the most widely used to cover the vast areas of the US in between the major cities due to it’s far better reach per tower than GSM.  The same should hold true for 4G/LTE since it offers 3-4 times the reach per tower at 700-800Mhz frequencies than traditional CDMA or GSM.   This reach has not been used yet by the carriers, as 4G/LTE has only been deployed in the largest cities so far and not been extended into the country at all in between those cities.  Those people are going to be left with their 1G/2G for many many years to come, or they may never be upgraded at all since the carriers have stated that they only intend to overlay 4G/LTE over their existing 3G coverage. 

    • Tim242

      Verizon’s 3G is virtually everywhere. By the end of next year, so will be their 4G.

  • Cellularcrazy09

    So pretty much, because Verizon is screwing us over they can build out the network pretty fast, but since other carriers aren’t doing that to their customers, they can’t build out as fast. Glad to be a Verizon customer….

    • Anonymous

      Except that DoCoMo and SK Telecom are screwing their subscribers over.  DoCoMo owns 50% of the Japanese mobile market and SK Telecom owns 50% of the South Korean mobile market.

  • Anonymous

    I’m glad Verizon is all in on the 4g. But how about fixing the spotty 3G in western NY first.

    • Bullet Tooth Tony

      What Verizon 3G in western NY?  Do you mean the 56k modem speeds we get when that little symbol pops up?  The constant dropouts?  The fact the limited spectrum here is oversold by an incredible amount?  The suberb 2-tin-cans-on-a-string voice quality?  That even our LTE is painfully slow in both Buffalo and Rochester?

      • Swainaaronj

        I live in the southern teir, about 60 miles south of rochester and my 3G coverage is pretty damn good out here.

      • Bullet Tooth Tony

        Do a speedtest.  If you crack 500 Kbps, you’re lucky.

      • Connor Frazier

        I just did a speed test on verizon in what Vermonters call city of 9000 and got 1.76 maps down and. 64 mbps up. pretty good to me!!! We won’t get LTE till 2013!!!
        I can’t enjoy my Bionic fully yet

  • Jab

    4G? Not according to ITU definition of 4G.. You are just perpetrating the fraud that the US carrier have been peddling in defrauding the US customers with false definitions.

    The US customers will continue to be misled and pay for “4G”, when in reality it’s just another “one of a kind” proprietary and incompatible set of wireless networks. Like GSM which is not GSM or CDMA that it’s not CDMA, to prevent customers from jumping from one carrier to another and keep the prices sky high..

    • Bullet Tooth Tony

      Are you kidding me right now?  The ITU does not define “4G,” and the term you are looking for is “IMT-Advanced” and not 4G… in fact, the ITU said LAST YEAR the following statement which allowed the naming of HSPA+ a 4G service:

      ITU has determined that “LTE-Advanced” and “WirelessMAN-Advanced” should be accorded the official designation of IMT-Advanced. As the most advanced technologies currently defined for global wireless mobile broadband communications, IMT-Advanced is considered as “4G”, although it is recognized that this term, while undefined, may also be applied to the forerunners of these technologies, LTE and WiMax, and to other evolved 3G technologies providing a substantial level of improvement in performance and capabilities with respect to the initial third generation systems now deployed.

      Go ahead…. google the paragraph.  Then try a little harder to keep up with last years news.

    • You’re Retarded

      Please post your definition of 4G. Just to give you a heads up, no one cares how you define 4G or anyone defines 4G.
      To your second point, there is no carrier worldwide that allows you to jump from carrier to carrier without roaming. Doesn’t matter if they are on the same frequency or not. Either you have to purchase a sim for that carrier or pay roaming charges through your carrier.

    • Anonymous

      Lmao you are so clueless.. I won’t even respond.. Read wikipedia and search Google for a few hours then come back..

  • Anonymous

    Have done a fare share of CDMA bashing over the years because IMO (and not a humble one because its my field of expertise and how I make a living) it should have died when TDMA died. I do however gotta give Verizon credit for “seeing the LTE” and letting the Dr. Frankensteins at Qualcomm know that the ride was over and they wouldn’t deploy UMB (the evolution of CDMA to 4G) for fear of global incompatibly.

    Sprint (because they are so flushed with Billions;^() on the other hand, took a long and costly road to “seeing the LTE”. As a fledgling network, if they had deployed GSM (like T-mo) from the start, at a time when AT&T and Verizon was stuck in the digital dark ages of CDMA/TDMA respectively, they would have been the NUMBER ONE US CARRIER! A “pure-play wireless operator” (no land-line cable/internet/tv) that would have (and still could) leverage the cable operators desire to get their wares into the mobile broadband space.

    But in stead they burn through capitol and customers by creating a Frankenstein patchwork of a network with incompatible techs like CDMA, iDen and WiMAX. What an astronomical waste of Billions! The are now however moving in the right direction to LTE. I just wonder where all the Billions come from to support this fickle behavior.. Tim D. and Dan H. should have acted sooner and more decisively when the took control. At the end of the day LTE, LTE+, LTE Advanced is the right path to 4, 5, 6G and beyond…

    • Anonymous

      Just so you know HSPA+ IS CDMA, UMB is OFDM just like LTE and WiMax..TDMA is 2G ALL 3G is based off CDMA Qualcomm has plenty of CDMA stickers on GSM devices..

      Sprint went Wimax because they FCC gave them a deadline and wouldn’t wait for LTE standards to be ratified..

      The spectrum from Nextel is worth more than Clear, the cost of the buildout, and the time lost.. If they didn’t sell service on 2500mhz by 2008 the FCC would have resold it

  • Jack

    Yeah like ATT really helped push our LTE score higher! Verizon is basically the only LTE carrier in the US.

  • Anonymous

    “A country that was recently the butt of jokes due to its ongoing reliance on CDMA networks”

    LOL, WUT?  You mean the country that had widely deployed CDMA through Verizon (primarily) which has allowed for a wider coverage area with fewer towers?  We all know how “reliable” the AT&T and T-Mobile GSM networks are…

    • Anonymous

      Not to mention ALL 3G is based off of American CDMA

  • Anonymous

    See what Telecom companies are capable of when they actually use their profits towards network improvements. 

  • Anonymous

    That actually sounds like some pretty cool stuff to me dude. Wow.
    Privacy-Toolz.tk

blog comments powered by Disqus