Amazon to lose money on each Kindle sold? UBM says Amazon will make $50 per unit

Business

Amazon will reportedly turn a profit of approximately $49 for each Kindle Fire it sells following the device’s launch next month. Earlier rumors painted a very different picture of Amazon’s strategy with its first media tablet, suggesting the retailer would be selling the slates at a loss of between $10 and $50 per device. The theory, these reports claimed, was that Amazon hoped to make up the difference and then some thanks to deep integration with paid Amazon services such as Amazon Video On Demand, the company’s popular MP3 music store and its Kindle eBook store. According to market research and consulting firm UBM TechInsights, however, these reports are not accurate. In fact, the firm says Amazon is looking at a sizable 25% profit margin on the device despite its low end user pricing. Read on for more.

Using estimated component costs of Research In Motion’s BlackBerry PlayBook as a point of reference — the Quanta-designed Kindle Fire is, after all, basically the same tablet in terms of hardware — UBM TechInsights was able to piece together what it believes to be a fairly accurate breakdown of Amazon’s cost on the Kindle Fire.

According to the firm, the 16GB version of RIM’s PlayBook carries a cost of $170 per unit. Cut $10.50 for the camera system, $1 from the cost of radio components, 50% from the cost of memory since the Fire only includes 8GB of storage, and $2 from the cost of various sensors, and you’re left with a $150 tablet that Amazon is selling for $199. Add to that profit from Amazon Prime subscriptions, Amazon Appstore app sales and money made from Amazon’s numerous other services, and the Kindle Fire is shaping up to be a solid moneymaker for the emerging tablet vendor.

Strategy Analytics projects that Amazon will sell more than 15 million Kindle Fire tablets by the end of 2013. The Kindle Fire begins shipping on November 15th.

Read

25 Comments
  • somedude0123

    Great jerb.

  • Anonymous

    then who pays for assembly, advertising, warehousing, transportation, retailer % commission (even amazon sells it – transportation, warehouse, employees etc) and finally development and support? considering all these costs Amazon is left with 0% return on the upfront price.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Mike-Fuller/584626026 Mike Fuller

    Are we sure this isn’t a playbook? They look exactly the same.

    • http://www.droiddoes.com/ Norm

      Playbook loses way more than 50 dollars per sale. That things sux!!!

    • http://twitter.com/mbcls ask me

      dont you glad playbook is not from apple?  otherwise apple will be suing amazon “you copying me!”  haha

    • Anonymous

      Designed by the same company and use the same screen

  • Anonymous

    Looks like no one cares. 3 comments? Back to the iPhone coverage! Apple will rule the world.  true story™©®

    • Anonymous

      zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

    • Anonymous

      i wish you would just die.

    • Anonymous

      Boring boring boring

  • Studynot -

    so what this article tells me is that Apple is making an estimated 270% profit PER iPad 2 3G they sell?

    ridiculous

    • Anonymous

      No, its telling you you don’t understand business economics any more than these jerks do

    • http://twitter.com/mbcls ask me

      yes! apple is making 270% profit per ipad2.
      remember how much hp touchpad originally sell for?  499$!
      and now they can afford to sell it at 99$?
      maybe that’s because touchpad cost less than 99$ to make.

  • joshie

    I find this rather hard to believe. 

  • Guest

    ,..awesome.., 

  • Helmholtz

    Research and development, transportation, warehousing? I have a degree in classical art and even I don’t think the economics of this “analysis” adds up.

    • Anonymous

      did you see the part of the table that said “BOM” or “Bill of Materials”? Should I assume that as a classical art major that you can’t tell the difference between hardware component expenses and operational expenses?   

      That said, it’s a pretty shoddy “analysis”, as it doesn’t even include the battery cost, which, given the tiny batteries most smartphones/tablets come with, is probably a significant part of the cost equation.

  • Anonymous

    Doesn’t this just make the Playbook look desperately over-priced? Especially considering what it delivers?

  • Hizkyas

    How about IP royalty payment to MSFT? That’s if Apple doesn’t file an injunction to ban all kindle Fire from being sold in the US

  • Anonymous

    A Bill of Materials(BOM) breakdown is only PART of the total cost of a device. The UBM breakdown is only for the BOM, while the comparison to estimates that Amazon would lose money, is based upon the total cost to Amazon. Two different things.

  • Dejong

    The battery is not mentioned in this price breakdown. Nor is assembly cost. They left out quite a few other things as well. So, im sticking with the original breakdown, i do believe amazon is loosing money on each device

    • Anonymous

      I’m wondering how it lacks so many features (apps, camera, video, etc.), yet has a really moderate battery life?! I think there are a lot of things Amazon is leaving out. 

  • Anonymous

    NOBODY believes you Amazon!!! These companies are hilarious!! They KNOW they’re going to flop, yet insist on publicly embarrassing themselves in a billion-dollar, cutthroat market! SUCKERS!!

  • Anonymous

    Thank RIM for the production of Amazon’s “Fire”. RIM failed to move units of already manufactured parts, so Quanta used “PlayBook” parts already made to supply Amazon with a “ready-to-go” product. RIM could sue, but then they’d have to pay for all of the parts they stuck Quanta with! SUCKERS!!

  • Simplymoneyclicks

    Do you realy think thy are or would take a loss?

blog comments powered by Disqus