ITC to investigate Apple's second patent suit against HTC

Legal

The U.S. International Trade Commission on Monday said it would investigate a second patent complaint Apple filed recently against HTC. The complaint seeks to ban the importation and sale of multiple HTC devices that Apple alleges are infringing on its intellectual property. Three companies will be targeted in the Commission’s investigation — HTC Corp., HTC America, Inc. and Exedea, Inc. — and a target date for the completion of the investigation will be set within 45 days. The ITC ruled in a separate case last month that HTC infringes on two Apple patents, and HTC said it would appeal the judgement. Apple executives reportedly claimed recently that they are willing to settle various patent disputes, but the company continues to pursue numerous complaints against HTC, Samsung and others. The ITC’s full press release follows below.

USITC INSTITUTES SECTION 337 INVESTIGATION ON CERTAIN PORTABLE ELECTRONIC DEVICES AND RELATED SOFTWARE

The U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) has voted to institute an investigation of certain portable electronic devices and related software. The products at issue in this investigation are hardware and software used in a variety of portable electronic devices, including mobile communication equipment.

The investigation is based on a complaint filed by Apple Inc. of Cupertino, CA, on July 8, 2011. The complaint alleges violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 in the importation into the United States and sale of certain portable electronic devices and related software that infringe patents asserted by Apple. The complainant requests that the USITC issue an exclusion order and a cease and desist order.

The USITC has identified the following as respondents in this investigation:

    HTC Corp. of China;
    HTC America, Inc., of Bellevue, WA; and
    Exedea, Inc., of Houston, TX.

By instituting this investigation (337-TA-797), the USITC has not yet made any decision on the merits of the case. The USITC’s Chief Administrative Law Judge will assign the case to one of the USITC’s administrative law judges (ALJ), who will schedule and hold an evidentiary hearing. The ALJ will make an initial determination as to whether there is a violation of section 337; that initial determination is subject to review by the Commission.

The USITC will make a final determination in the investigation at the earliest practicable time. Within 45 days after institution of the investigation, the USITC will set a target date for completing the investigation. USITC remedial orders in section 337 cases are effective when issued and become final 60 days after issuance unless disapproved for policy reasons by the U.S. Trade Representative within that 60-day period.

12 Comments
  • Getitwhileitzhot

    When is an apple not a pear?

  • Anonymous

    Where is Google ? The big mouth Eric Schimdt said Google will support HTC in its patent battle against Apple

    • Anonymous

      Yeah ok, cause handing out Android for free is not enough lol. Now they want google to buy patents and hand them out for free too.

  • Anonymous

    Apple will rule the world. Android will be dead in two years.  true story™©®

    • Anonymous

      Since Apple is violating the patents held by HTC, no.

  • KPa

    Another day, another suit by Apple. Enough already…

  • Anonymous

    I just paid $ 23.86 for an iPhone and my girlfriend loves her Dell laptop that we got for $ 38.76 there arriving tomorrow by UPS I will never pay such expensive retail prices in stores again. Especially when I also sold a 42 inch LED TV to my boss for $ 665 which only cost me $ 62,81 to buy. Here is the website we use to get it all from, GrabPenny.com

  • Anonymous

    This is why iphones are so high priced… its to finance all these litigations… handsets dont really cost $700.00 to make at foxconn… its to finince the war in the courts… and who pays for these ridicoulous suits? the moronic apple fanboys.

    • Anonymous

      Who pays $700 for an iPhone?

      And you also lack common business sense; if the iPhone COSTS $700, then the sale price would be $1,000+ given a 35% gross margin.

      The iPhone is priced at what it is because that’s what the market feels it is worth. 

      • guest

        Are you kidding me? Since when does it cost 700 bucks for any piece of hardware in the Iphone? Everyone needs to make money some how. Apple tells u the phone is at cost, but the true cost is probably around the 350 mark after paying out everyone aside from the sales reps. 

      • Anonymous

        I didn’t say the iPhone costs $700. The original poster said that iPhones don’t cost $700 to make, implying that Apple is selling it for too much money. Apparently, companies are supposed to sell products at their cost. I was making the point that if the iPhone really did cost $700, which is what it technically sells for unsubsidized, it would be priced at considerably more.

        And Apple has never said it sells the iPhone at cost. Apple usually provides its services (i.e. iTunes Music Store) at cost, as it’s business model involves making money off the hardware.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_5SFD6KPU5YRVLISL2J6IOMX2FI Dennis Sargent

    I paid $22.85 for an iPhone 4-32GB and my girlfriend loves her Panasonic Lumix GF 1 Camera that we got for $38.76 there arriving tomorrow by UPS. I will never pay such expensive retail prices in stores again. Especially when I also sold a 40 inch LED TV to my boss for $674 which only cost me $62.81 to buy. Here is the website we use to get it all from, CentHub.com

blog comments powered by Disqus