Dear tablet makers: You're doing it wrong

Featured

Needham analyst Charlie Wolf issued estimates on Monday that put Apple’s iPad atop the mountain of forthcoming consumer tablets for a full decade. Wolf sees the tablet market climbing to 233 million units sold in 2020, and he thinks Apple will own 60% of the market at that point in time. Apple is on a tear right now, of course, and estimating that Apple will dominate the smartphone or tablet market moving forward is becoming akin to estimating that the sun will rise tomorrow. At the same time, there is a broader picture being painted by all of these analyst forecasts, and it is this: the tablet market is going to be big, and Apple’s competition isn’t doing what it takes to make a dent. My thoughts on the market follow below.

I have argued on numerous occasions that there is no tablet market right now, only an iPad market. Consumers continue to show remarkable interest in a shiny large-form Apple device that can be had for as little as $499. The fact that it is a tablet, I believe, is secondary to the fact that it is a comparatively inexpensive Apple device that is a pleasure to look at and a pleasure to operate. Yes, it’s a tablet, but a $500 Apple netbook might have seen similar rapid adoption. Beyond the iPad, consumers have exhibited little interest in tablets and the explanation is simple: why should they? What compelling reason is there to look at any of these tablets over Apple’s burning hot iPad? What exciting, unique functionality do they offer? What do these tablets provide in the way of differentiation beyond an overcomplicated user experience, an “open” operating system and Flash support?

While the market is still in its infancy, we can likely already say at this point that slapping Android on a slate and shoving it out to market simply isn’t an effective strategy. We’ve only seen a few Android success stories play out so far, with tablets like Samsung’s Galaxy Tab and ASUS’ Eee Transformer shipping in the millions. And with Apple selling more iPads in a month than most Android tablets do in a quarter — or even a year — it’s getting to the point where something has to change.

But there can be a tablet market, and there will be.

I still say that tablets are useless (and yes, RIM’s BlackBerry PlayBook is still my favorite among them). This will change, however. Repeated cold and lukewarm launches will either push vendors out of the tablet space or open their eyes. Consumers don’t need oversized smartphones. I’ll type these all-too important words a second time: slapping Android on a slate and shoving it out to market simply isn’t an effective strategy. The real problem might be that OEMs are looking at Android wrong. What might happen if vendors stop rushing duds out to market and actually concentrate on using Android as a platform rather than a complete solution?

Look at how well HTC is doing with its Android smartphones; four consecutive months with record revenue speaks volumes. HTC makes fantastic phones and it has solid relationships with carriers around the world, but the company’s Sense suite also plays a huge role in the success of its devices. All of HTC’s most successful smartphones feature Sense, and this is anything but a coincidence.

Vendors have to take this concept a step further with tablets. Five steps further, even. Use Android as the groundwork for a unique tablet offering with unique functionality and differentiating features that consumers actually want. Flash support and “true multitasking” aren’t getting the job done. Don’t just toss Honeycomb in a slim case and rely on marketing to sell a device — features should sell the device, too. Android is a fantastic chassis with a powerful engine, but it’s not going to hold the road without four wheels and it’s not going to draw any attention without a sleek, aerodynamic body.

And there is plenty of room to innovate in the tablet space, which is still less than a year-and-a-half old. One quick example: sharing is caring. It is unfortunate that the iPad doesn’t feature multi-user support, but it is unforgivable that Apple’s competition hasn’t jumped at the opportunity to throw this feature into the mix and let families share a single device while maintaining the privacy of each individual user. $500+ is a lot of money to spend on one person. Just as families often share desktop computers now, so too should they have the option of sharing a tablet. Selling one device to five people isn’t as appealing as selling five devices, of course, but I would argue that a feature like multi-user support would open far more doors than it closes.

Amazon is the company to watch right now. When it finally does release the tablets we’ve been waiting on for months, I believe the experience will be vastly different than the experiences afforded by the current crop of Android tablets. As we discussed on a recent BGR podcast, Amazon has multiple value-added products that it can integrate deeply into its tablet experience. The Kindle book store, music downloads, streaming movies, cloud storage and streaming services, and of course an immersive shopping experience can all combine to provide a total package that simply isn’t available with other Android tablets. Looking forward to 2012 and 2013, I also think Microsoft has the potential to make a huge splash in the tablet space with Windows 8. Convertible form factors and a truly full-featured operating system could usher in an era where the line between tablet and notebook no longer exists. The post-post-PC era, if you will.

220 Comments
  • http://twitter.com/cyberb0b Bob Autrey

    Between the fanboys on both sides of the fence, the comment sections in tech blogs are all but useless. It’s like listening to Bevis and Butthead argue. Stupid insults and dick jokes account for seemingly 95% of the posts.  I miss the days when subjective comments or opinions could be expressed by the readers on devices and platforms without being attacked by a bunch of rabid fanboys. 

    I don’t get it. I can go into an ice cream shop and order a scoop of chocolate without being attacked by the guy behind me who likes vanilla. Why can’t you just like your device without having to hate a person for using something else?

  • Anonymous

    The only thing tablet makers are doing wrong is pricing. Thinking they can price it like an Apple product doesn’t work with laptops; why would it work with tablets? Pricing needs to be in line with something like an Acer or Asus laptop vs a Macbook. You can get awesome laptops for $400 to $600, whereas the cheapest Apple laptop is twice that. Apple for some reason has a perception of luxury, and whether this is deserved or not, it’s simply a market reality. 

  • Anonymous

    With the current functionality of tablets, there’s no need for a multi-user interface to “hide” personal data.  And by no need I mean the number of people that would use that or think it a must have feature are miniscule. 

    I await the competition to the iPad as it will only make both better.  I just wish I didn’t have to wait so long for android mfg’s to bring some competition to the marketplace in features, not quantity.

  • Goose

    I would like to weigh in as a consumer. And judging from the rest of the comments, afandroid as well. I didn’t have too much time with an iPad. I picked up a friend or family members here and there. What I had expected to be a bigger iPhone turned out to be mind blowingly cool when the apps came. It was a better browsing experience than my netbook, and likely easier to carry. I decided to wait for a good Android tablet, and settled on the Xoom. One for its easy rootability and also because I’m an early adopter. To say that I wish I had waited for the Galaxy 10.1 would be true, but such is the case with almost any great tech purpose. I’m still thrilled with the Xoom and still waiting for all of those apps I was promised.

    I agree that the makers of Android tablets aren’t doing a good enough job. The Xoom and Galaxy are the only ones with decent build quality, yet aside from thickness and screen they are all rather the same. But do I wish I bought an ipad? Nope. I enjoy what I get with growing on this, which is most of what I do beside from reading. Having choices for my book stores is great, but the apps dont compare to their ipad counterparts. All in all I’d say where the manufactures are losing is build. Doesn’t matter though, if its flst and has a touch screen they are due for litigation, so really the crappier the better. No, its the development of apps that is truly lacking on these devices. No one buys them because there are no apps. No one makes apps because no one buys them. Android is not the problem, only the foundation of it. The problem is the lack of apps in comparison and we have a long way to get there. Still wouldnt trade my Xoom for an ipad. To say that honeycomb is hard to use, is like saying everyone is just too stupid to use it.

    • http://twitter.com/androidhelpers Android Helpers

      I disagree. I have the Asus Transformer and I love it to death. In fact, I picked it over both the Xoom and the Galaxy tab…

      But that’s the best part about Android, choice.

  • http://twitter.com/brianchau Brian Chau

    HTC Flyer and Lenovo ThinkPad tablet differentiate themselves from the rest, including iPad is their support of a pressure-sensitive pen, making it ideal for note-taking and drawing.

    Another reason why I would like to have a tablet other than an iPad is if the tablet can run a full OS. Like the ASUS EP121 at present which runs Win 7. When Win 8 arrives next year, that would mean people can truly carry a tablet instead of notebook around when on the road.

  • Anonymous

    I use my Android tablet every day (even though the operative system itself, 3.1, is a real beta quality buggy mess) and I find it quite useful for what I use it for and find the form factor to be an advantage over other options.

    So the statement that tablets are useless is pure BS. That statement litterally torpedoes any credibility that this article might otherwise have.

  • Kevinaneilson

    I couldn’t disagree more with this article. Adding bloat ware ruins these devices. I have owned 5 Android phones and 4 Android tablets and my favorite phone by far was the Nexus One. Why? Unadulterated Android with amazing hardware. No crappy Touchwiz or Motoblur or HTC Sense. Differentiate with the hardware and let Google do the software.

  • Demofya

    There would be a tablet market if the makers would stop wasting their time trying to beat Apple at its iPad game and do whats best for the end users. Afterall, why make something for a niche market such as Apple??? You would think these manufactures would have learned their lessons from the mp3 player wars…..

  • Chondro1

    It sounds funny but I get the sense that this article was written by someone who doesn’t use a tablet/ipad or netbook in real life. I do and I use them both everyday. I have a Acer 11.6 netbook and 2 ipads (1&2). I can tell you that using the ipads are super easy and very desirable. I find myself not wanting to open my netbook more and more. What I am really looking for is a Windows based tablet that is simply a netbook morphed into a tablet. I need the functionality of Windows, some solid processing power, a decent harddrive (250G min), USB ports, good battery life and I will be good to go. If Acer and other companies can produce netbooks for $300 to $450, then make them touch screen and get rid of the keyboard and you will sell millions. Just like they did with netbooks!

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000461791057 Jason Vicinanza

    I use my iPad to listen to the radio. Thats a very expensive radio.

  • Anonymous

    Volkswagens sells more cars tha Ferrari does.
    Is Volkswagen better than Ferrari?

    Quite frankly this article is pretty poor.

    “What compelling reason is there to look at any of these tablets over
    Apple’s burning hot iPad? What exciting, unique functionality do they
    offer? What do these tablets provide in the way of differentiation
    beyond an overcomplicated user experience, an “open” operating system
    and Flash support?”

    Sorry, I don’t get the point.

    It is really exciting that I can view all content while browsing. My tablet is lighter than the iPad’s and it is thinner. It plays all my media, reads my emails, plays Angry Bird and Fruit Ninja… thats pretty much why I got a more sphisticated one than the iPad….

    • Racer416

      Of course VW is better than a Ferrari. For several reasons:
      1. It’s German
      2. VWs get better gas mileage
      3. VWs have better TV ads – who doesn’t like those Das Auto commercials?

      The bigger question should be: Why would anyone want to buy a Tablet over a small Notebook? Tablets are just oversized phones, you can really do anything productive on them for any length of time.

  • http://gplus.to/FaustsHausUK Dale P

    The success of the iPad is as much due to its fully integrated ecosystem as the manufacturer logo slapped on the back.

    Of every tablet released and rumoured, the Amazon one people have been whispering about is the only one that can truly compete: they have an app store, a music store, a video store with streaming video, a book store, and have got cloud computing sussed already. An Amazon-branded tablet with all of their services fully integrated is the one I’d bet on.

  • Saywhat

    I am probably the only one, but I was taken completely by surprise by the iPad taking off. I just don’t see the need for or usefulness of a tablet, whether iOS or Android or WebOS. While my smartphone slips in my pants pocket with ease, I’ve gotta carry the tablet around. And for it’s size, it’s extremely limited compared to a 13-15 inch laptop, which can be had for just a bit more. (I know, the tablet is lighter and thinner, but not so much so as to make it a worthwhile investment.)

    I use my smartphone for everything – surfing, streaming, scheduling, gaming, etc…I have no further need of any tablet. I can only see getting one to put movies on for my son on trips – and for that limited purpose, I’d rather buy a 7″ portable DVD player for 1/5th the price.

  • Laugsb1

    Completely backward, outdated thinking.  I submit that no ones wants a vendor’s crappy, half-baked bloatware that ends up splintering the market for a given OS.  This sucked on Windows Mobile, it sucks on Android phones that still do this, and it will suck on tablets.  It also means that when a new OS version is ready, you’ll have to wait for the vendor to integrate it with their junk, if they ever decide to do it at all!  iOS is successful because it is consistent across devices in terms of features and user experience (my wife can use an iPod, an iPhone, and an iPad without a second thought, yet struggles to change batteries in the TV remote).

  • http://profiles.google.com/jayq330 Jonathan Oquendo

    “ All of HTC’s most successful smartphones feature Sense, and this is anything but a coincidence. ” umm, yeah…that all of there phones successful or not has had sense u.i. since the htc hero. but i understand what your saying they have to do something drastic, the webOS is an OS that can do this job but the hardware is lacking or is it the look? besides the fact that i have not seen one commercial on air mention HP’s webOS… 

  • Anonymous

    There is no post or even post post PC market.  Not when tablets (including the Max-iPad) STILL NEED PC’s to be connected to a REAL COMPUTER.

1 2 3 4
blog comments powered by Disqus