Exclusive images of AT&T’s Samsung Galaxy S II revealed

Exclusive

BGR has obtained exclusive images of AT&T’s upcoming Samsung Galaxy S II smartphone. Following our report on Monday showing an unnamed Samsung slider headed to AT&T, we have confirmed that the device pictured is indeed a variant of Samsung’s blockbuster Galaxy S II headed to AT&T. Live images of the device reveal the Galaxy S II model number, SGH-I927, along with additional details surrounding the sleek Gingerbread phone. While it appears as though Samsung managed to keep AT&T’s Galaxy S II relatively slender in spite of adding on a full sliding QWERTY keyboard, the textured back cover on the phone looks like a bit of an eyesore. The Galaxy S II is already the fastest-selling Samsung smartphone of all time, and it has yet to launch on a single carrier in the U.S. market. While U.S. carrier versions of the smartphone are expected to arrive in August, release timing and pricing for the AT&T version pictured here are not yet available. It is also unclear whether the device will launch with the Galaxy S II moniker or with AT&T’s own branding as the original Galaxy S did. Several additional images, including a pair that shows off some very impressive benchmark test results, follow below.

200 Comments
  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_SYUGGAGCOQL4FPMPYMWGROZC34 cousinit99

    The key word is S2 “VARIANT” people.  Come on people, pay attention.  This is not the Attain.  It’s clearly a different model entirely; it even says so right in the article.

    “Live images of the device reveal the Galaxy S II model number, SGH-I927, along with additional details…” 

    The original S2 is SGH-i900.  Simmer down, stick..

  • Fastball_90

    thank you AT&T for ruining my dream phone…part of the appeal of the SGSII was the super slim form factor

  • Another_Android_Phan

    I don’t see a single AT&T brand anywhere on the phone, in any of these pictures.  Am I missing something?

    • tazunc1141

      that’s what i’m wondering. nothing in the pictures or even in either of the articles by BGR says how they know that it’s the at&t variant. i hope it’s not.

      • Anonymous

        The model number: SGH-i927 is a dead give away that its for AT&T.  All model numbers starting with SGH and ending in 7 are for AT&T.

        The only strange thing is that the Infuse 4G is SGH-i997, making it the highest numbered, and presumably flagship device for AT&T. Unless they are abandoning the higher number=better phone numbering scheme.

      • Mydragoon

        agreed… and sgs2 outside of US is actually having the model number GT-I9100 (4 digits). . 

  • Anonymous

    I don’t know why everyone thinks this phone is going to be so thick.  The Droid3 is only 13mm thick, that’s barely bigger than the iPhone3G.  Even the one year old Epic with a WiMax antenna is only 14mm thick.  Samsung has a knack for making thin phones I would be surprised if this phone was much thicker than 12mm.  Do you really think you’ll notice much difference holding or carrying a phone that is only 3-3.5mm thicker than the slab version.  In fact, unless you have tiny hands the added thickness should make it more comfortable to hold and use.  Not to mention the added screen real estate you gain when typing on a slide out keyboard vs an onscreen keyboard that takes up 50-80% of the screen depending on the orientation. Its not like its going to be 20mm thick like the Tilt or Tilt2.  

    I just don’t understand the form over function sentiment with something you use as often as a phone.  If it were a watch or something that you wear and want people to notice that’s one thing, but for something utilitarian, like a phone, isn’t function more important?  Seriously, do you really think anyone is going to judge you poorly if your phone is 12mm thick vs 8.5mm thick?

  • rab7a451d

    As I said yesterday in here, Samsung wants to overtake Nokia as the largest handset maker in the world (Nokia’s troubles and Samsung’s SGS II 2011 successes tell me Samsung will be #1) to stimulate the most sales, I still think AT&T will introduce two versions of the Samsung Galaxy S II, one with the physical keyboard you see here, the other without (and that will provide the super slim feel and look the Samsung Galaxy S line is famous for).

    Another reason why I think AT&T will be sporting two versions of the SGS II is that Samsung is NOT giving any U.S. carriers the exclusive on the SGS II, therefore, I can see AT&T having both in the inventory.

    Lastly, I don’t see AT&T making a choice like Sprint did, Sprint choosing to sell the Samsung Galaxy S Epic that had a physical keyboard while other carriers chose to sell the touchscreen only device.

    Oh, and isn’t AT&T big enough that it can feature both phones for subscribers? Seems that AT&T is fully aware of how many customers (and potential market) want phones with keyboards and those who want one without.  I suspect the numbers are high enough for both groups to warrant getting both versions of the SGS II in inventory.

    In other words, there’s no need to get upset, yet, with AT&T if you want the “slimmer” SGS II.  At least calm down until we see what all AT&T intends.

    I think the bigger news here is that the SGS II apparently can be ordered by the carrier with a physical keyboard.

  • http://twitter.com/azambujafabio Fabio de Azambuja

    I wish people would stop hating on the hw-keyboard, I was waiting for the nokia n950 to finally replace my n900 but since nokia killed off meego and decided to release the n950 only as a limited dev. phone I have been looking for a good android device with a hw-keyboard and this one looks very promising, it’ll be a pain going from maemo to android though.

  • Zac Crawforth

    Agreed!  I can see how some people don’t want a HW keyboard, but some of us do.  Soft keyboards are great for a text message, a quick status update, or a short email, but for anything serious you need a hardware keyboard.  SSH and RDP/VNC/Citrix sessions, long emails, and spreadsheets all suffer from the reduction in screen real estate that the soft keyboard causes.
    I, for one, welcome this phone.   If it’s half as awesome as the SII (and comes out within the next few months) I’ll be picking one up.  Looks like a serious phone for serious work.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_YUFMRZR353MU35T5ADC7KKT7IQ Josefina Nixon

    I just paid $22.87 for an iPad2-64GB and my girlfriend loves her Panasonic Lumix GF 1 Camera that we got for $38.76 there arriving tomorrow by UPS. I will never pay such expensive retail prices in stores again. Especially when I also sold a 40 inch LED TV to my boss for $675 which only cost me $62.81 to buy. Here is the website we use to get it all from, WildCent.com

  • Sandroid

    I love keyboards, bring it on

  • orly

    att just said they would provide the non-slider version aswell…

  • Noor Mahmoud

    Wow, that is one keyboard that I have to honestly say looks hideous. I don’t even want to imagine using it… Way to ruin an awesome phone att.

  • http://twitter.com/DigitalYout R. Johnson

    I want Sprints version of the SGSII.

  • http://gossip-juice.com Marc

    Hmm..it looks interesting!

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Andrew-Haslem/714744173 Andrew Haslem

    FAIL!  Nice reporting!

  • Anidraig699

    Dude the iPhone is the biggest piece of shit ever…. no coverage…besides the one that they rip u off on… and the signal sucks!!! I live in California so that’s proof right there….. also it’s had the most bugs …and its the only phone in the world that can (BRICK) its self……iPhones suck (BALLS)

    PRETTY SURE THE iPhone 3 gonna suck to!!”

1 3 4 5
blog comments powered by Disqus