Open letter to BlackBerry bosses: Senior RIM exec tells all as company crumbles around him

Business

There’s no question Research In Motion is in the midst of a major transitional period. The company is planning to launch a brand new product line based on a brand new operating system within the next 12 months, and even though the first device born out of RIM’s new QNX OS was impressive in some ways, it was incomplete. There still is a chance for RIM to deliver some really interesting competitive products, but time is quickly running out, as we have written time and time again. The thing is, RIM has always been a company controlled by two people — Jim Balsillie and Mike Lazaridis. For all the things that have worked, they have missed the boat countless times and we’re now seeing the results.

We have received an open letter to Mike and Jim from a high-level RIM employee (whose identity we have verified), and in an amazingly honest and passionate plea, this letter gives fascinating insights into what RIM must fix, and fast. RIM did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Read the open letter in its entirety after the break.

P.S. If you’re an employee of RIM and want to send us your thoughts and feelings on the company, you can send them to us via email or leave a comment below.

UPDATE: Following this post, RIM issued an official response to the letter below. The company’s full response can be viewed here.

UPDATE 2: BGR has exclusively published two additional letters from RIM employees. They can both be viewed here.

To the RIM Senior Management Team:

I have lost confidence.

While I hide it at work, my passion has been sapped. I know I am not alone — the sentiment is widespread and it includes people within your own teams.

Mike and Jim, please take the time to really absorb and digest the content of this letter because it reflects the feeling across a huge percentage of your employee base. You have many smart employees, many that have great ideas for the future, but unfortunately the culture at RIM does not allow us to speak openly without having to worry about the career-limiting effects.

Before I get into the meat of the matter, I will say I am not part of a large group of bitter employees wishing to embarrass us. Rather, I believe these points need to be heard and I desperately want RIM to regain its position as a successful industry leader. Our carriers, distributors, alliance partners, enterprise customers, and our loyal end users all want the same thing… for BlackBerry to once again be leading the pack.

We are in the middle of major “transition” and things have never been more chaotic. Almost every project is falling further and further behind schedule at a time when we absolutely must deliver great, solid products on time. We urge you to make bold decisions about our organisational structure, about our culture and most importantly our products.

While we anxiously wait to see the details of the streamlining plan, here are some suggestions:

1) Focus on the End User experience

Let’s obsess about what is best for the end user. We often make product decisions based on strategic alignment, partner requests or even legal advice — the end user doesn’t care. We simply have to admit that Apple is nailing this and it is one of the reasons they have people lining up overnight at stores around the world, and products sold out for months. These people aren’t hypnotized zombies, they simply love beautifully designed products that are user centric and work how they are supposed to work. Android has a major weakness — it will always lack the simplicity and elegance that comes with end-to-end device software, middleware and hardware control. We really have a great opportunity to build something new and “uniquely BlackBerry” with the QNX platform.

Let’s start an internal innovation revival with teams focused on what users will love instead of chasing “feature parity” and feature differentiation for no good reason (Adobe Flash being a major example). When was the last time we pushed out a significant new experience or feature that wasn’t already on other platforms?

Rather than constantly mocking iPhone and Android, we should encourage key decision makers across the board to use these products as their primary device for a week or so at a time — yes, on Exchange! This way we can understand why our users are switching and get inspiration as to how we can build our next-gen products even better! It’s incomprehensible that our top software engineers and executives aren’t using or deeply familiar with our competitor’s products.

2) Recruit Senior SW Leaders & enable decision-making

I’m going to say what everyone is thinking… We need some heavy hitters at RIM when it comes to software management. Teams still aren’t talking together properly, no one is making or can make critical decisions, all the while everyone is working crazy hours and still far behind. We are demotivated. Just look at who our major competitors are: Apple, Google & Microsoft. These are three of the biggest and most talented software companies on the planet. Then take a look at our software leadership teams in terms of what they have delivered and their past experience prior to RIM… It says everything.

3) Cut projects to the bone.

There is a serious need to consolidate our focus to just a handful of projects. Period.

We need to be disciplined here. We can’t afford any more initiatives based on carrier requests to squeeze out slightly more volume. Again, back to point #1, focus on the end users. They are the ones making both consumer & enterprise purchase decisions.

Strategy is often in the things you decide not to do.

On that note, we simply must stop shipping incomplete products that aren’t ready for the end user. It is hurting our brand tremendously. It takes guts to not allow a product to launch that may be 90% ready with a quarter end in sight, but it will pay off in the long term.

Look at Apple in 1997 for tips here. I really want you to watch this video because it has never been more relevant. It is our friend Steve Jobs in 97 and it may as well be you speaking to RIM employees and partners today. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3LEXae1j6EY

4) Developers, not Carriers can now make or break us

We urgently need to invest like we never have before in becoming developer friendly. The return will be worth every cent. There is no polite way to say this, but it’s true — BlackBerry smartphone apps suck. Even PlayBook, with all its glorious power, looks like a Fisher Price toy with its Adobe AIR/Flash apps.

Developing for BlackBerry is painful, and despite what you’ve been told, things haven’t really changed that much since Jamie Murai’s letter. Our SDK / development platform is like a rundown 1990′s Ford Explorer. Then there’s Apple, which has a shiny new BMW M3… just such a pleasure to drive. Developers want and need quality tools.

If we create great tools, we will see great work. Offer shit tools and we shouldn’t be surprised when we see shit apps.

The truth is, no one in RIM dares to tell management how bad our tools still are. Even our closest dev partners do their best to say it politely, but they will never bite the hand that feeds them. The solution? Recruit serious talent, buy SDK/API specialist companies, throw a truckload of money at it… Let’s do whatever it takes, and quickly!

5) Need for serious marketing punch to create end user desire

25 million iPad users don’t care that it doesn’t have Flash or true multitasking, so why make that a focus in our campaigns? I’ll answer that for you: it’s because that’s all that differentiates our products and its lazy marketing. I’ve never seen someone buy product B because it has something product A doesn’t have. People buy product B because they want and lust after product B.

Also an important note regarding our marketing: a product’s technical superiority does not equal desire, and therefore sales… How many Linux laptops are getting sold? How did Betamax go? My mother wants an iPad and iPhone because it is simple and appeals to her. Powerful multitasking doesn’t.

BlackBerry Messenger has been our standout, yet we wasted our marketing on strange stories from a barber shop to a horse wrangler. I promise you, this did nothing to help us in the mind of the average consumer.

We need an inventive and engaging campaign that focuses on what we are about. People buy into a brand / product not just because of features, but because of what it stands for and what it delivers to them. People don’t buy “what you do,” people buy “why you do it.” Take 3 minutes to watch the this video starting from the 2min mark: http://youtu.be/qp0HIF3SfI4

6) No Accountability – Canadians are too nice

RIM has a lot of people who underperform but still stay in their roles. No one is accountable. Where is the guy responsible for the 9530 software? Still with us, still running some important software initiative. We will never achieve excellence with this culture. Just because someone may have been a loyal RIM employee for 7 years, it doesn’t mean they are the best Manager / Director / VP for that role. It’s time to change the culture to deliver or move on and get out. We have far too many people in critical roles that fit this description. I can hear the cheers of my fellow employees now.

7) The press and analysts are pissing you off. Don’t snap. Now is the time for humility with a dash of paranoia.

The public’s questions about dual-CEOs are warranted. The partnership is not broken, but on the ground level, it is not efficient. Maybe we need our Eric Schmidt reign period.

Yes, four years ago we beat Microsoft when everyone said Windows Mobile with Direct Push in Exchange would kill us. It didn’t… in fact we grew stronger.

However, overconfidence clouds good decision-making. We missed not boldly reacting to the threat of iPhone when we saw it in January over four years ago. We laughed and said they are trying to put a computer on a phone, that it won’t work. We should have made the QNX-like transition then. We are now 3-4 years too late. That is the painful truth… it was a major strategic oversight and we know who is responsible.

Jim, in referring to our current transition recently said: “No other technology company other than Apple has successfully transitioned their platform. It’s almost never done, and it’s way harder than you realize. This transition is where tech companies go to die.”

To avoid this death, perhaps it is time to seriously consider a new, fresh thinking, experienced CEO. There is no shame in no longer being a CEO. Mike, you could focus on innovation. Jim, you could focus on our carriers/customers… They are our lifeblood.

8) Democratise. Engage and interact with your employees — please!

Reach out to all employees asking them on how we can make RIM better. Encourage input from ground-level teams—without repercussions—to seek out honest feedback and really absorb it.

Lastly, we’re all reading the news and many are extremely nervous, especially when we see people get fired. We need an injection of confidence: share your strategy and ask us for support. The headhunters have already started circling and we are at risk of losing our best people.

Now would be a great time to internally re-brand and re-energize the workplace. For example, rename the company to just “BlackBerry” to signify our new focus on one QNX product line. We should also address issues surrounding making RIM an enjoyable workplace. Some of our offices feel like Soviet-era government workplaces.

The timing is perfect to seriously evaluate at our position and make these major changes. We can do it!

Sincerely,

A RIM Employee

530 Comments
  • Anonymous

    Why this guy is NOT running the company is beyond me.

    In fact, it is why RIM is about 3 quarters from merger or acquisition city.

  • Vik Mehta

    isn’t the easiest solution to partner with Android and deliver a “Blackberry on Android” experience.  Think of a Torch like gizmo with blackberry email like functionality.  So simple, so elegant, so easy.  QNX was a disaster, admit it and move on.  Imagine all the nice things of blackberry email and bbm and ALL the nice things of Android.    Also drop the RIM name and move to Blackberry.  That is the brand, the product, that’s what consumers want.

  • Eugene JZ

    “Just curios, what can you do with your blackberry besides making calls and emails?… Nothing.” –  
     
    And what’s wrong with that?
    Sure it might be nice to watch media, use apps, and play games, but is that why you’re buying it?
    Chances are, they’re used as a means of passing the time.  You’ll still be using email, BBM,and SMS for most of the time.
     
    I won’t disagree with the notion RIM can make improvements to its devices, but let’s not forget their market is completely different.  BB users tend to be business professionals and iPhone users the hipster-esque types. Why should RIM go after the latter?
    The Playbook was their first mistake.

    • eheffa

      Some of us use our devices for other ‘serious’ applications.

      I use my handheld to keep track of my patient care responsibilities and my professional billings. My Blackberry was totally hopeless in running a simple relational DBase program. My 7 year old Palm device was way better than the BB.

      Calendar apps and accessing the web are quite useful for busy professionals. The iPhone blows the BB away in these important functions.

      Sorry to say but the BB gets a failing grade for what I need from a PDA / phone device.
      - evan

  • Chamapete

    At first with my BB storm you would have to pry it from my cold dead hands,(69 yrs) but after a year of frustration and Bull S… from RIM and verizon I was looking for someone’s butt to cram it into. I am now a very happy iphone 4 user. Bye Bye BB.

  • Anonymous

    If this RIM employee convinces anyone else at RIM to be blinded by Apple’s success, then RIM will never succeed.  What Apple does is what is right for their culture, consumer, partners, and just the entire Apple ecosystem.  Apple, like BMW, spends much of their efforts in maintaining control of from software to hardware in an effort to maintain the highest quality product for their users that are willing to pay a premium for such products.  If a user defects to Android or another platform, Apple doesn’t need to care.  That user was never meant to be an Apple user and was just using Apple as a connection to another flight.  If RIM tries to do the same, they will most certainly fail as most other companies have who have tried in the past.

    If my grandma gets a phone, it’s not because it doesn’t have flash and it doesn’t advertise multitasking.  If my grandma gets a phone it is because she can get support from most everyone.  I think the strongest thing the PlayBook had going into this race was optimized Flash support and it’s powerful multitasking features that worked fluidly with the UI.  If you go to Best Buy or any other electronic retailer, the sales people will tell you that this is one thing that people wanted and one thing that kept many people from purchasing the iPad.

    The PlayBook now represents the failure of understanding what core features that were needed and wanted by the end user and should have focused making sure those users had the best experience out of the box on day one.  Now RIM has given more momentum to the TouchPad, having already making the market aware of what possibilities a tablet could offer and allowing HP to associate all of those possibilities with their tablet created on a more mature OS by a experienced team of developers with all the passion and reasons in the world to beat out their competition.

    At this point it may be best for RIM to start milking BlackBerry for all it’s worth and winding down operations in preparation for a buy out or a shut down.  The market can’t bear another competitor in already cluttered market.  With the PlayBook having come out to early and much to short of expectations, RIM really doesn’t have a chance anymore.  This is not one of those Michael Dell moments telling the public that shareholders should get what they can on a company that is hemorrhaging cash and has little or no more value in the market.  RIM doesn’t have a Steve Jobs to save them and RIM doesn’t have the flexibility, agility, or confidence of the consumer or stakeholders to change themselves.  Michael Dell may have been speaking about Apple back 1997, but his words hold no truer than to RIM.   The ironic thing is that at this point in the mobile tech game is that Dell may be one of the best suitors for RIM.

  • TUCARONICK

    sounds like the ppl. @twitter-14518587:disqus  bb are another dept. of the present  ”just 4 us” government we have……there was always a reason i never went to bb..there was something negative bout it, and now i know why my intuition was sending me signals and have never gotten 1……but i see 3rd world countries getting bombarded by the outdated bb’s……that’s right since our public is getting smart lets lay all the devices on countries that don’t kno better!!!………..SO, THE BLACKBERRY COMP IS ALSO ANOTHER REASON WHY WE ARE CONSIDERED ABUSERS IN OTHER COUNTRIES……..the comp. is a small, but a lesson nevertheless, as to why many countries hate our form of buss…………(remember the red dye that causes cancer?, our surplus is still being sold to 3rd world countries..!!!!!…………..WE R A MAGNIFICENT EXAMPLE OF PRIDE, RIGHT?

  • Jual Beli

    Excellent blog! I definitely love how it’s easy on my eyes as well as the facts are well written. I am wondering how I might be notified whenever a new post has been made. I have subscribed to your rss feed which need to do the trick! Have a nice day!

  • Anonymous

    Sad, really.

  • Anonymous

    RIM is dying. Period. It will be acquired by someone for its patent portfolio as a defensive measure. Then all will be buried.

  • Corpkid

    I’ve had smartphones for 10 years now.  Started with Windows Mobile (crap), then Palm, then I got the iPhone (revolutionary, really) and stuck with them all the way up the latest iPhone.  Then my company said I needed a BB to continue to get my work email (I’m an IT tech on call 24/7).  I got the Torch.  2 weeks later I returned the torch because it was a horrible piece of crap and had terrible apps and felt so damned cheap.  I got an Android phone (Galaxy S) and guess what, it isn’t perfect, but it sure works well and the apps are pretty decent and I can do everything I want with it (and I’m a big smart phone user with hundreds of apps).  That said, I have an iPad2 but long for a Playbook (yes, my best bud has one and this is a very good tablet).  The damn thing is useless without a BB phone though, and I just refuse to get another P.O.S. BB phone!  So NOOOOOOO Playbook for me!

    If RIM can release a phone that has the same user experience as the Playbook (which they keep saying they will) then I will jump back.  Until then, I’m waiting for the iPhone 5 or whatever and will switch back to that.  I hope RIM hurries up or they’ll lose my $1000 (phone + Playbook).

    A sinking ship indeed.  Fingers crossed for them as I DO want them to succeed (more competition is GOOD folks!)

  • yet_another_bb_dev

    Reading this at work while waiting for crappy 9000 simulator to finally launch. I even interested how many things a person could do while waiting for bb simulator to launch: watch a youtube video, sleep a bit, read blogs)) Seriously, I started learning Android. RIM has the greatest problem  - they even can’t admit they are on the wrong way. And I’m almost sure they use iPhones or some of these new nice Android devices themselves – why surround themselves with crap even at home? ))   

  • Nope

    I’ve worked at RIM… it’s like being in a soviet era gulag… too many (and there are MANY) managers believe they have a divine right to manage, yet have no experience nor expertise in managing anything let alone a cell phone company.

  • http://twitter.com/johnconroy johnconroy

    I’m not a business guy but I found this call to arms utterly compelling and convincing.

  • http://techtakes.net Arthur P. Johnson

    This employee’s advice about advertising isn’t awfully sharp. but his product-development advice is spot on. Steve Job built and rebuilt Apple to revolve around product development. RIM had a better mousetrap for so long they forgot the rules. Apple bring out comparatively VERY few devices for such a large company. Instead of spawning a skillion guppies, they work on a handful with all their hearts and souls. Creating even a modest hit requires laser-like concentration and passion. RIM needs to focus on getting ONE great, powerful, QNIX-powered, dual-core, long-battery-life, slide-out keyboard phone ASAP. They could have it out by Christmas if they had the corporate structure and near-maniacal will to get it done.

  • Anonymous

    “Apple… beautifully designed products that are user centric and work how they are supposed to work”

    +1!!!

  • Lucas

    Most of this RIM guy’s points are not really sound. If I was running RIM I’d ignore him. Or check to see if apple is paying him.  Too many chefs spoil the soup. 

  • Samikas

    Thank you to the author and BGR for having the guts to bring this to us, and hopefully to RIM. As a former RIM employee, I had these sentiments 4 years ago, and things much have slipped downhill significantly. Sadly, they didn’t need to slip further than they were for the situation to be just as dire as it is for the ailing company. I won’t bother talking about how innovation is 0, accountability is non-existent, creativity is stifled etc. etc. but I will expand on point 8. The entire time I was at RIM I was afraid. This is quite something, because I am incredibly thick-skinned and aggressive, but a person can only witness so much finger-pointing and ass-covering before paranoia sets in. Combine a toxic work environment with a boss whose favourite word is F&*% and who has a propensity for throwing things (pens, papers, oh, and a stapler) and most people would cower. Don’t get me wrong, RIM had some inspirational leadership; people you wanted to work hard for, people you stretched to emulate. Problem is, all the folks I longed to have as a boss instead of the one I had are gone now. Have they been replaced with leaders of equal quality? I’ll never know. I do know the foul-mouthed stapler tosser is still over there stifling the creativity and desire out of formerly happy people. Why would I expect any different? 

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=683220045 Vladimir Bogdanov

    The author of this letter is bang on! RIM needs to refocus their strategy on their core base and capabilities, business executives with needs for high fidelity & secure communication. Failing that, they will simply perish within a matter of a few years.. or what is most likely get absorbed in a hostile takeover when their share prices drop significantly enough. They are too late to start fighting a direct war with the likes of Apple & Google. Focus on your niche RIM.

  • Cc

    Some one seeking attention …

  • Tim

    I believe a significant portion of Apple consumers using the products because ‘the product just works’. Stress free.

1 10 11 12
blog comments powered by Disqus