FTC may subpoena Google in anti-trust investigation

Legal

The Federal Communications Commission may subpoena Google during the next five days as part of an anti-trust investigation related to the company’s search and web advertising practices. According to The Wall Street Journal, it is only illegal to purchase or abuse a monopoly, and so a subpoena and an investigation aren’t particularly damning to Google. Reportedly, investigators will examine if the search giant has purposely pushed users towards using its own services, as opposed to those offered by its rivals, using its own online advertising and search network. “Google engages in anticompetitive behavior…that harms consumers by restricting the ability of other companies to compete to put the best products and services in front of Internet users, who should be allowed to pick winners and losers online, not Google,” Fairsearch.org said. The watchdog group is representing a number of Google competitors Expedia, Kayak, Sabre Holdings, and Microsoft. Google faced a similar threat from the Justice Department in April when it proposed buying ITA software, but it settled by allowing the government body to examine some of its practices. The WSJ said a subpoena and an investigation could take a year to wrap-up, and it’s entirely possible nothing will change.

Read

19 Comments
  • ha

    then can they please subpoena apple for making people use itunes?

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_JNKVTT7PJMXPYP2GVCIERBQQCU Andrew

      Yeah but the iPhone is Apple’s product.  The Internet isn’t Google’s product. Kinda different. Not that I am saying people shouldn’t be able to use something other than iTunes.  Merely pointing out the error in your logic.

    • http://www.droiddoes.com/ iNorm

      Who is making you use iTunes? Don’t want to use it? There are plenty of options.

      • ha

        reliable (and free) options though? i have yet to find one.

    • http://www.facebook.com/applelover Tim Meesseman

      Using iTunes is something you accept when you buy an iProduct. Nobody is forcing you to buy one.

      • ha

        using an iproduct is something you accept when you buy an iproduct. thanks for that.

  • Anonymous

    Basically, the FTC is investigating Google for being too damn good. Google didn’t kill Yahoo or Bing or Altavista or any of those other companies through unethical business practices.

    It’s just that, for the vast majority of users, the vast majority of the time, it’s better than any other alternatives.

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_JNKVTT7PJMXPYP2GVCIERBQQCU Andrew

       That may be the case but many people wouldn’t know what the alternatives are since Google shoves everything down our throats.  And better is purely subjective.  I rarely use google to search for anything. So for me it isn’t better. 

      • Anonymous

        Did I say everyone, all the time? Nope. I intentionally qualified my statement. And how would you not know what the alternatives are? How many Bing commercials do you need? How many Yahoo! commercials are there? How many Google commercials are there?

        How, praytell, are they shoving everything down our throats? There’s nothing requiring you to get a GMail account. Nothing says you have to use Google Maps. Nothing says you have to use Google anything. There is an alternative for damn near everything in Google’s ecosystem (I say damn near because I don’t know about everything Google offers).

        Where are they forcing you to use their services… ever?

      • ha

        (coming from an android user) actually google does force you to get a gmail account if you have an android phone and want to access apps, sync, etc.

      • Anonymous

        @76601290a86b23b83443eb3c8f5b16b7:disqus This is true. But… who’s forcing you to get an Android phone? Nobody. I think the point remains that, for all the shit that Google gets, it never forced anyone to use their products. It just made products so damn good that relatively few people even wanted to use anything else.

        So, to recap: in America, you’re punished for being too successful. But if you have a hand in fucking over the global economy… we give you money. Odd, that.

      • sirpaul

        It’s you that chooses to type “www dot google dot com”, not Google. Only reason this is going on is because lawyers are getting bored.

  • http://www.wbklaw.com Mike Sullivan

    In the first line, that should be “Federal Trade Commission,” not “Federal Communications Commission.”  The FCC would never issue a subpoena to Google.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_JNKVTT7PJMXPYP2GVCIERBQQCU Andrew

    Other companies just need to step up their game.  Microsoft pushes all their products on us through PCs, Apple does the same with their computers and iOS devices and Google is basically doing the same with the Internet.  

  • http://profiles.google.com/mikkelsonr Rolf Mikkelson

    Interesting… Now the FTC is going to try to make it illegal for a company to advertise on their own web site. When you walk into a Ford dealership, do you expect to see advertisements for GMC and Dodge?

    • ha

      the auto industry and the internet are two different things.

    • http://www.facebook.com/applelover Tim Meesseman

      I love it when people try to compare two different industries to prove a point… just like when people are saying TVs look the same, so Apple shouldn’t be able to sue Samsung for the same design in a phone.

      It sort of reminds me of the Wookie Defense from South Park.

  • notbrit

    Fairsearch isn’t a watchdog group.  It’s a trade group of Google competitors.  IF you are going to cover real news, cover the facts.

    • notbrit

      And its the Federal Trade Commission, not the Federal Communications Commission.  Duh.

blog comments powered by Disqus