T-Mobile responds to Sprint, other merger opponents

Breaking

In what is no doubt a response to Sprint’s statement Tuesday morning that AT&T is increasing its spectrum the wrong way by purchasing T-Mobile, T-Mobile’s senior vice president of government affairs, Tom Sugure, has issued a formal statement to those who oppose the acquisition. “The opponents of the AT&T-T-Mobile merger have had their final say as part of the FCC’s formal pleading cycle and, not surprisingly, they have failed to offer any credible arguments to support their view that the Commission should deny the transaction,” Sugrue said in the statement. Sprint, which has lashed back at the acquisition from the get-go has said the purchase will stifle innovation. ”What is surprising, however, is their repeated head-in-the-sand insistence that no spectrum crisis exists,” Sugrue added. “As part of their application, AT&T and T-Mobile provided a compelling showing of their need for more spectrum to continue to provide quality service to customers and roll out new technologies in the future. And the two companies have demonstrated that a combination of their networks and spectrum holdings is by far the best way to solve this problem and ensure improved service and enhanced innovation. The FCC has long acknowledged the harmful consequences of ignoring the spectrum crunch, and we are confident it will approve our proposed market-based solution.”

25 Comments
  • http://twitter.com/simoncabron Simon Cabron

    I wonder how hard this dude is going to defend this merger once it happens and he gets laid off.

    • Thevoiceofreason

      I see you’ve never heard of a “golden parachute”.  Must be nice to live in a glittery innocent world.

    • Anonymous

      He’s a senior vice president. He’s going to get a sick severance package. Why would he be against this?

      • Lukos69

        Unless he gets canned just before the buyout, like the Skype VP’s just had happen to them.  Yeah, their parachutes will still be golden, just more 14K instead of the 24K they might have had if their new robot, I mean corporate, masters weren’t such dicks.

  • Ncj9

    When he gets a one year paid vacation for getting laid off, he’ll take it fine.

  • http://twitter.com/Ether813_IX Ian Ximinies

    I see someone…Tom Sugure, has already started receiving his AT&T payrate…

  • Sam

    Me and my friends would make jokes about T-Mobile and say it stands for Trash-Mobile, because that is how low of a quality their signal is. I recently switched to Verizon after being with T-Mobile for so long back to when it used to be called VoiceStream, so I am not speaking out of ignorance. I live in and go to school in international cities, Boston and Cambridge, MA, and the signal is utter crap. If T-Mobile’s signal is poor in international cities, then what benefit will it have for AT&T? 

    My opinion is that if AT&T is going to take T-Mobile, go ahead, they will be shooting themselves in the foot. Because not only are they going to waste money on acquiring the company, but also in upgrading it, which they will drain much of their resources before they get any perceived benefit from it. And I think, in my opinion, this is why Verizon is not concerned about this merger whatsoever. 

    • Anonymous

      You obviously have no idea what’s going on here. Its all about SPECTRUM man.

    • http://www.droiddoes.com/ iNorm

      I had tmobile from 2001 to 2010. They were okay when I was in a major city like Columbus OH where I’m from or in other big cities throughout the country, but in between and right out of the metro area they were complete garbage. My guess is AT&T will use their bandwidth in major cities to supplement the stuff they already have. Tmobile certainly won’t be helping in places like highways between cities, 5 miles outside of any major beltway or in the country where At&t already lacks.

    • DontBelieveTheHype

      Cambridge is not an international city. It’s the fifth populous city in the state and exists mainly because of Boston. 

      Verizon is not concerned with this merger because reducing the competition serves them as well. They can do like they did with the elimination of “unlimited data” and copy AT&T.

      For customers that are happy with T-Mo, it means higher prices.

    • DontBelieveTheHype

      Cambridge is not an international city. It’s the fifth populous city in the state and exists mainly because of Boston. 

      Verizon is not concerned with this merger because reducing the competition serves them as well. They can do like they did with the elimination of “unlimited data” and copy AT&T.

      For customers that are happy with T-Mo, it means higher prices.

  • Anonymous

    If they both have spectrum constraints I seriously don’t understand how combining the two will relieve it.

    The spectrum crunch will still CRUNCH them unless they buy MORE new spectrum.. not just move it all to one company along with the subscribers.. if we all get moved onto AT&T’s 3G network it will be 2008 all over again..HORRIBLE. If we stay on T-Mobile 3G it will not provide any immediate increase in capacity or coverage for us and most of the AWS spectrum will be used or is already maxed out in some markets.

    • Lukos69

      Just wait until the FCC makes them AT&T divest themselves of parts of the T-Mobile network.  That happened with Verizon when they bought out Alltel in markets were they would’ve had a monopoly.  AT&T/T-Mobile will still be spectrum-poor in areas where AT&T is currently hurting.  They just want the licensing for specific markets so they can finally start expanding using the LTE 4G technology the reset of the world (and Verizon) are getting and running.  Their current “4G” HSPA network is a joke and they are crawling in their setup of LTE.  Same with the dying-on-the-vine Sprint, getting ready to be split up or purchased outright by some cell player who wants their spectrum.  The problem is there is only so much bandwith in any given FCC-mandated market area, and only the FCC can designated what part of the overall bandwith will be marked for cell companies and their data-hungry users.  Now, who wants to give up their AM/FM radio and over-the-air TV airwaves?  How about your garage door opener frequency?  Emergency services or military spectrums?  No?  It’s all part of the same electromagnetic airwaves, folks.  Unless you can change physics, they ain’t making more.  TANSTAFL

  • Anonymous

    None of you know what the hell you’re talking about.

  • http://robert.aitchison.org raitchison

    In the (unlikely) event that the merger is rejected T-Mobile is screwed, they have effectively no LTE upgrade roadmap (that that have talked about anyways) if the merger doesn’t go through they will reach a point where they won’t be able to squeeze more speed out of the HSPA+ 3G network they are calling “4G” and will be left in the dust by LTE.

    • Frankolaniyan

      If the deal fails, TMO gets 6 billion

    • Frankolaniyan

      If the deal fails, TMO gets 6 billion

      • Anonymous

        and free roaming on ATT’s network. Besides their speeds now are more than sufficient to compete with the current stage of LTE, which leaves them enough time to ponder more about which direction for LTE or technological breakthrough to improve current GSM data rates (see below UMA_Fan’s comment).

        Anyway, thats 6 billion, free roaming(no payment from T-Mo to ATT to use their network) and dear I say, the Iphone 5. I think thats a nice recipe for a surge subscriber sign-ups

        /just sayin’

    • Anonymous

      HSPA+ scales all the way to a whopping 672mbps -This still will be of benefit to customers with the old HSPA 3G handsets because it will take maximum advantage of the max 7.2mbps they are capable of.   T-Mobile actually issued a press release before the merger with concrete plans to reach that speed within the next few years.  That would have crushed anything LTE would be capable of since the current LTE being deployed is about 50mbps and I doubt plans for the next five years included any plans for scaling up those speeds because scaling up LTE is VERY expensive… scaling up HSPA+ is cheap.  Since HSPA+ has far better battery life there is really no doubt eventually at some point everyone would start losing market share to T-Mobile when they realize they can do everything they did on expensive LTE in more places for cheaper with T-Mobile AND their devices get better battery life along with it.  At&t COULD have gone this route too but jumped into investing in LTE fast because they have available spectrum and their current spectrum is to capacity.  The technical advancements in HSPA+ were made relatively recently far after everyone else committed to LTE and WiMax but it’s something T-Mobile jumped on because they had a spectrum deficiency.  This route really turns out better for everyone.  Why pay more for Verizon with LTE available almost no where with horrible battery life even when you do get it when i’m enjoying a speedy 42mbps HSPA+ connection with better battery life for less money?  Every year T-Mobile doubles their theoretical speeds.

      • Lukos69

        Yep, HSPA+ is uber-fast.  Too bad it lost the war to LTE, but them’s the breaks.  Just like VHS beating out the superior Betamax, in the typical human way of things, best isn’t always what drives industry.  LTE was chosen by the vast majority of the cellular providers around the world and was promoted the HELL out of by anyone with a vested interest.  HSPA+ will eventually whither on the vine and anyone using it will be a niche player in the global market until true “4G” is developed and the next round of oneupsmanship begins.  And no, HSPA+ doesn’t reach that standard either.   

  • Anonymous

    I guess the “Stick together” thing was bs.

  • Anonymous

    Tmobile and At&t are both total jokes they need to stop the sharade…

  • TomCruise

    Loser! Both he and his employer. They’re definitely gonna lose a lot of customers to Verizon & Sprint.

  • Anonymous

    Sounds like a big Monopoly in the making to me dude.

    http://www.web-privacy.no.tc

  • Jmec45

    Some of you are talking out of your rear end. When Cingular purchased AT&T wireless, ALL employees got absorbed. AT&T will most likely do the same. This is NOT a merger, its an aquisition. They will need to compensate for all the new customers formely of tmobile, how? Alot of tmobile stores will most likely become at&t’s, and where are all those employees going to come from? hmmm

    The network can only benefit, AT&T’s approach is alllll about capacity on its different generations of networks. Verizons LTE is getting 25mbps, where as AT&Ts HSPA+ is getting 21mbps in recent lab testing. Heres the kicker, When AT&T’s LTE launches, the backhaul and capacity will smash Verizon. Verizon has 4G and 3G.

    AT&T will have                                            Verizon

    LTE                                    4G                      LTE
    HSPA+ 14.0                      “4G”                      
    HSUPA – HSDPA  7.2                        
    UMTS                                3G                     EV-DO
    EDGE                               2.5G
    GPRS                                2G                      1RXT

blog comments powered by Disqus