Dolby sues RIM for patent infringement, looks to halt BlackBerry sales

Business

Dolby announced on Wednesday that it has filed patent infringement lawsuits against Waterloo, Canada-based Research In Motion in the U.S. and in Germany. The suit seeks the recovery of financial damages resulting from RIM’s infringing products, and it also looks to halt sales of multiple BlackBerry devices. The patents in question cover “highly efficient digital audio compression technologies” that minimize storage space occupied by high quality audio files. Dolby claims that RIM uses these technologies in its BlackBerry smartphones and its PlayBook tablet, but it does not pay Dolby licensing fees as all other major manufacturers do. “Litigation was regrettably our last resort after RIM declined to pay for the use of Dolby’s technology,” Dolby EVP and general counsel Andy Sherman said in a statement. “We have a duty to protect our intellectual property.” Dolby’s full press release follows below.

Dolby Sues Research In Motion for Patent Infringement; Seeks Sales Halt Of Unlicensed Blackberry and Playbook Devices and Monetary Damages For Past Use

SAN FRANCISCO–(BUSINESS WIRE)–Dolby Laboratories (NYSE:DLB), through its wholly-owned subsidiary Dolby International, has filed patent infringement lawsuits in the U.S. and Germany against Research In Motion (NASDAQ: RiMM), a Canadian manufacturer of wireless handset and tablet devices. The lawsuits seek recovery of financial damages and injunctions to halt sales of the many RIM products that infringe Dolby’s patents.

The lawsuits explain that RIM infringes Dolby patents covering highly efficient digital audio compression technologies which allow manufacturers and consumers to provide and enjoy high quality audio while using extremely limited amounts of transmission and/or storage space for such audio. RIM employs Dolby’s patented technologies in its Blackberry smart phones and Playbook tablet devices, without having obtained licenses from Dolby, the lawsuits say. All other major smart phone makers have agreed to license the Dolby technologies which are the subject of this litigation.

Dolby’s patented technologies, which have been incorporated into the international standard known as High Efficiency Advanced Audio Coding (“HE AAC”), provide the core of HE AAC. Demonstrating the value of the Dolby technologies, HE AAC is widely used in consumer electronics devices such as smart phones, portable music players, and computer tablets to play back music and other digitized audio that has been compressed to less than 10% of its original digital file size.

“Litigation was regrettably our last resort after RIM declined to pay for the use of Dolby’s technology,” said Andy Sherman, executive vice president and general counsel of Dolby. “We have a duty to protect our intellectual property.”

The U.S. lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The German lawsuit was filed in the District Court of Mannheim in Mannheim, Germany.

34 Comments
  • RicoRich196

    I mean if this was brought to their attention and RIM refused to pay up than what else is there left to do? Pick up the ball and go home?

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_GP2WYAHXS6CRUREISWBGPUSUGE Michael

    Damn now blackberry will not be able to sell those 2 dozen devices this year.

  • Anonymous

    No need for Dolby to file to stop RIM sales of BB. Rim has that operation already in place and handled themselves.

    • Jimbo_Jones

      Funny but true. RIM just keeps churning out the same tired, old, boring hardware and software while Android, Microsoft, and HP/Palm continue to innovate. In a few years they will be at the bottom of the phone list.

  • http://twitter.com/brianMedeiros Brian M

    New Law!
    No one is allowed to sue anyone over patents unless they buy the entire global population a cookie!

    Just fixed the patent system. Your welcome

    • numetheus

      Dolby is a technology created and branded with that name. The way it works is this. Company A spends a lot of time and money to create a technology. Company B is supposed to pay company A for use of the technology created using their time and money. Saying anybody can freely use the technology of a corporation without having to pay licensing is extremely idiotic. There would be no incentive for companies to create new technologies. Because based on your logic … nobody is allowed to sue, so anything can be used freely by companies wanting to steal the work of someone else.

      These patent laws not only protect companies from stealing works by others, it also allows people to freely create new stuff without fear someone can just freely take it and ride freely on their coat tails.

      • http://twitter.com/brianMedeiros Brian M

        I agree, which is why in this case its worth Dolby getting me a cookie. They have a strong case.

      • numetheus

        LOL Oh I see what you did there. LOL

      • http://twitter.com/matokira Mato Kira

        In a perfect world, the incentive to make new and better technologies would be advancing the quality of life for all of us.

        But alas..
        Technology could set us all free.. if the goal was a better life for all of us, and not profit.

      • numetheus

        And I completely agree. Although, the world we live in now is capitalistic. A world where technology is created by companies for the sole purpose of improving quality of life and not profit exists purely in movies like Star Trek. lol. In this world in this time, everything is done for a profit.

      • Anonymous

        @ numetheus,

        Don’t be a moron. Capitalist societies are responsible for the development of the automobile, the locamotive, the airplane, air conditioning, food preservatives, the cure to polio, computers, etc. Socialist foolishness is responsible for hunger and disease.

  • numetheus

    If this goes through RIM gets what they deserve. You can’t just start using another company’s technology without paying them for it.

    • Egigjewig

      shut up
      ur annoying

      • numetheus

        Wow you’re an idiot. Troll.

      • Egigjewig

         ugly virgin, please be quiet
        ur “knowledge” about patents was discussed, and we decided that you should stop writing, since ur obviously an idiot who’s too stupid to understand anything

        therefore i’d like to ask you to keep your “wannabe-knowledge” to urself
        thanks in advance, fatass

      • numetheus

        LOL there is no point in replying any further to you. You are clearly an idiot and have absolutely no knowledge in anything except sucking penis. 

    • Anonymous

      And what makes you think this suit is going to go all the way?  Did you know that Dolby has licensing agreements with most of the major smartphone makers and RIM just happens to be still in negotiation?  It’s too bad Dolby became impatient and sued but an agreement will be made before this makes it to the court.  This is not big news.  Every smartphone companies, including Apple, are currently in hundreds of suits.  You just don’t hear about until one of these tech blog sites spill the beans.  It just happens that BGR loves to do what it does, which is to purposely, without any merit, show RIM in a negative light.  Maybe you don’t agree but fact is a fact.

    • Anonymous

      Unless your Apple, then it is all cool.

  • QNX Please

    RIM hasn’t released a new phone since August of last year… what took so long Dolby?

    • ZMc

      Correction, make that October 31st, you cannot forget the Style released on Sprint, lol. I know it is easy to forget unless you are into clam shells.

      • QNX Please

        Oh right, sorry, I forgot Sprints exclusive BlackBerry they got RIM to produce.

  • Anonymous

    “it also looks to halt sales of multiple BlackBerry devices”

    Um, Rim is doing a pretty good job of that themselves.  Why waste the money.

  • Max

    Dolby sound on a RIM product? Wow! That’s some awesome 80′s technology there, RIM! What’s next? Bose speakers for the Playbook! No highs, no lows, just BOSE! I think I saw a BB RIMjobber walking around in parachute pants and leg warmers..and yes, it was a guy.

    • Anonymous

      Okay, I’ll bite.  If you bothered to read the post instead of just mindlessly hating on RIM, you would know that almost all smartphone makers utilize Dolby technology, hence they pay Dolby a tidy sum in licensing fee.  Unless you don’t have a smartphone, this would also make you an 80′s icon with an Adidas rugby pants.  BTW, congratulations on curing your stuttering problem.  I don’t normally make fun of people with disabilities but you are a special case.

      • Max

        Don’t you mean the super tight short adidas soccer shorts typical of the 70′s? Yeah a RIMjobber probably would have those on also.

    • Booboolala2000

      To say you are uneducated when it comes to Dolby would be an understatement. Do some research please.

  • Greg

    It seems like RIM has become quite the shady company. They have no problem suing KIK for stealing their intellectual property yet they won’t pay Dolby?? Seems kinda hypocritical. Its a moot point as RIM is falling by the wayside

    • Tedley

        Shady company.  Well,looks like they have something in common with Apple, Google, M$……
      I guess you could say they’re in pretty good (or bad) company depending on your prospective… 

  • LiLbaBYbUrRy

    YoOOoOOoOOOOOooOOooo
    FuCk ThOsE PussY asS HaTas….

    aaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhh yeeEeEEeeeEe hit me on my bLaCk burry,,,,,,,,,, 

    mah black burry burry uh mah black burry burry  
    uhh uhh huhhh mah black burry burry  

    whAthCaa whAtchAa know jigga jigga  
    blackburry iS the bEsT jigga jigga  

    yeh uhh uhh yeah uhh uhh you so nice black burry  
    uhh yeah  oh sh*t you so nice burry, i wAnNa cUm on you blackk burry (AND YO MAMA TOO) 

     uhh yeah hit me on mah black burry, mah black burry burry

  • whoswho

    Please sue them out of existence, then maybe my company will get rid of my crapberry and give me a really phone. Really, please do.  I’m not joking.  Can other companies follow this course of action…. wait… this is how companies make money in 2011(tivo! anyone)

  • Anonymous

    lawsuit after lawsuit with cell phone manufacurers. insane.

  • Todd

    Just because someone says that you infringed on their patent(s), doesn’t mean that you did. Dolby assumes one thing and RIM says, not.  You don’t just pay money to everyone that comes along who says you owe them.  Glad you guys aren’t running my company! 

  • androidsux4life

    fuck off dolby, u buncha whiny bitches. its not hard to duplicate your “technology”. its nobodys fault but your own for being morons who make simplified code. eat shit &die

  • http://twitter.com/rcgmobi Richard Someone

    Seems like patents are the only way to generate money now days for companies. Like seriously they should grow up and work for their money. If the coding matches then sue.

blog comments powered by Disqus