Google did nothing illegal in blocking Skyhook-Motorola deal, company claims

Business

Google told the Superior Court in Boston last week that it did nothing illegal with regard to blocking Skyhook’s contract with Motorola. Skyhook wireless, a private Boston-based LBS company, filed suit against Google in September 2010, alleging that the Internet giant interfered with a contract the company had recently been awarded by Motorola. The deal would see certain location-based services from Google replaced by Skyhook’s solution, which, according to Google Group Project Manager Steve Lee, were better and more accurate than Google’s own offering. Email chains made public as part of the hearings clearly show that Google took action to get its services back on Motorola phones, but Google contends that its actions were all legal. “To the extent Google took any action that affected Skyhook, those actions were the lawful exercise of legitimate rights of Google and therefore are not actionable,”Google said in a court filing. “If Skyhook suffered any damages, which is denied, then any such damages resulted solely from its own acts or omissions.”

Read

24 Comments
  • Anonymous

    Google is slowly changing their motto from “Don’t be Evil” to BE EVIL. 

    • Anonymous

      how is this being evil? Please explain to me how a company protecting its own product illegal? So Google is going to give their OS away for free and then let other companies profit off of it leaving them out in the cold. Google gives away Android so that they can gather data and get revenue in the advertising market. If they cant do that effective then Android is a wash. 

      Google’s whole “Dont be Evil” is directed at how they manage and user our data that they gather. Two companies fighting it out in court has nothing to do with that. 

      • Anonymous

        Calling an OS open source and then twisting the hands of handset makers from behind is EVIL. Also this whole Skyhook thing was caused because Google wasn’t able to collect data. How far will Google go for data. And what do you think they are using that data for?

      • Anonymous

        Wait wait so Google is the @sshole here lol. So Google is suppose to just give you the OS for free with no strings attach. Them running into competition issues with other companies isnt them being evil to us. What part of the whole dont be evil motto dont you get isnt about that at all. Dont be evil is geared towards us and them not abusing our data. Google is a business that is in the business of making money dude. 

        About Android not being Open Source well think of it like this. No FULLY 100% Open Source would ever fully be success off of the pure fact that so many people would change it that it would never be fully adopted by the masses. There has to be some restrictions. As Open as Android is currently they are still suffering from fragmentation. So again i look at this as a good thing. I want OS that i can customize and know it will be supported. 

        About what do with my data, well they use it advertising and the second they start selling my data to companies and sharing my data with companies i dont want them too i will close my account. They know their business is primarily built on trust from the user (us) so the second they want to gamble with that trust is the second that Google will crash and burn.

      • http://twitter.com/androidhelpers Android Helpers

        There is a difference between an OS and the APPS that run on it. A HUGE difference. Google merely restricts use of their apps and branding.  

      • Anonymous

        I do agree with some of the points about fragmentation. But “Don’t be evil” is the company’s motto, not Google’s data department motto. So it should apply to all the businesses. As for the Open Source thing, its either 100% open or its closed, there is nothing like partially open source. If Google stops calling Android Open, I will have no problem with their business practices. Back stabbing other companies after calling their product open source is wrong.

  • Anonymous

     It certainly wasn’t illegal.

    The problem is, it wasn’t “open” either. 

    • Generatione

       Illegal? No. Shady as hell? Yes.

  • worldbfree4me

     I concur with Google! To do business with Apple you have to follow their roadmap and likewise with Google or any other company. If MOTO wanted to use Skyhook or say Bing, they could have, but would we still have the Droid or Xoom? Besides, the name Skyhook was lifted from Maserati’s suspension system!

    • Anonymous

      Apple isn’t claiming to be “open” though. 

      • worldbfree4me

        Open is one thing, but letting a manufacture replace your native or proprietary software with someone else’s is ludacris! Imagine Apple allowing Amazon to completely replace iTunes on iPhone or Microsoft allowing Google Docs to completely replace Windows Office on WP7 it ain’t happening!

        Sent from my EVO 4G
        ¯_(ツ)_/¯

        —– Reply message —–

  • Anonymous

     just buy skyhook and call it a day lol. We get better GPS software and you wont get sued. Everyone is happy.

    • http://twitter.com/androidhelpers Android Helpers

      There is a problem though, Skyhook isn’t necessarily better.

  • Anonymous

    on nokia symbian devices, skyhook sold an app called Maps Booster ($2.99 when it first came out, i think it’s cheaper now) that extended the default location stack with skyhook’s tech.

    it worked great, for the most part.  though back then the wifi based location was easily confused – when i moved from one town to another, the software saw the same SSID and kept virtually relocating me to somewhere between my current and previous homes. it took months to learn that the new location was in fact correct.

    aside from that, their location service was excellent. solid GPS fixes in a fraction of a second, and i’m pretty sure they implemented a kalman filter for location data to help bracket your location down when all signals were lost – something that happened a lot when driving through tunnels or next to tall buildings in the city. despite the actual satellite reception faltering, skyhook claimed to know right where i was and empirically it was correct.

    kinda sad to look back and realize that their hard work was mostly flushed down the toilet after this fiasco.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Egypua-Venus/100001718397006 Egypua Venus

     I paid $32.67 for a XBOX 360 and my mom got a 17 inch Toshiba laptop for $94.83 being delivered to our house tomorrow by FedEX. I will never again pay expensive retail prices at stores. I even sold a 46 inch HDTV to my boss for $650 and it only cost me $52.78 to get. Here is the website we using to get all this stuff, MadCent. com

  • Bingwhat

    Google has a right to determine what software goes into what will be “with Google” branded phones. I mean, when you buy an Android device you are basically looking for 2 things, the best hardware, and the Google experience, i.e. gmail, market, Google maps, navigation, search, etc.

    If Moto wanted to release this with Skyhook, they could still have done that but, 1) it could not have been a “with Google” smartphone, not a Droid, in Verizon, which are all “with Google” devices. They could have followed Samsung and released their Android device with Bing, but we know how well that worked out for Samsung. Most people cried bloody murder at the Fascinate being Binged, and quickly looked for ways to remove the offending service to replace it with Google’s own. Don’t get me wrong, the Fascinate can be a great device, once rooted and rommed, but I specifically chose not to buy it because it came pre-loaded with Bing, and outside of rooting and voiding one’s warranty, made it impossible to change it or remove it.

    BGR, you guys never reported this, so I’ll ask. There was a big brouhaha over Samsung’s Fascinate coming all Binged up. Samsung said that when they released Froyo to everyone, they would make it easy to switch search providers, from Microsoft to Google. Did they actually follow through on that, or did they just get away with saying it, and then forgetting about it, by having everyone focus on how long it took for them to get Froyo on the Fascinate?  

  • Anonymous

    And even if they did, we (the Goofan aka Apple Hater Nation) will support them and agree with them and their actions, NO MATTER WHAT THEY DO!!!!!  Period!  And if you don’t like it, TOO BAD!

    Oh, and I forgot to add… This is quite the opposite to Apple. No matter what they do and how they do it we will NEVER EVER support them. Period! And if you don’t like it, TOO BAD!

    • FedUP

       UGh. I’ve about had it with your trolling.

  • Anonymous

    How is Google been Evil Android belongs to them – they work very hard to keep the platform afloat and Innovate on it all the time so it’s not fair for some company to take a free ride of its creation , their is many manufactures doing this already they don’t need another competing company riding of its own success i think Amazon is enough. 

    • http://www.droiddoes.com/ Norm

      Absolutely. Google has been nothing but perfect, free and open. If they had an altar to worship at I would make a daily sacrifice to Eric Schmidt.

      • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_ZX7I3VN423YBFEWTEQOQ5JR5ME Retro

        We would settle for you personally being sacrificed.

      • Anonymous

        LOL :)  thats funny  

  • Petshopmode85

    Sorry, brah, it’s just business. There are always grey areas to the concept of “open”. Does this defy that notion in a way, yes. But, in the end, it’s all business. Google wants to make money. Would Motorola accept if Samsung’s Media Hub was written into the Android code as a standard? Of course not!

  • Anonymous

    What…would expect any company to admit to doing something illegal after having done it? 

blog comments powered by Disqus