Apple, Google, others hit with antitrust class action lawsuit over ‘no solicitation’ agreements

Legal

Apple, Google, Intel and Adobe are among the companies named in a new class actions lawsuit filed on Wednesday in the state of California. The suit, filed by former Lucasfilm software engineer Siddharth Hariharan, alleges that Adobe, Apple, Google, Intel, Intuit, Lucasfilm and Pixar violated antitrust laws by conspiring to fix employee pay.” Hariharan claims that these companies have colluded to limit career opportunities and impose artificial salary caps for employees by entering into agreements that prevented the companies named in the suit from hiring employees away from each other. “My colleagues at Lucasfilm and I applied our skills, knowledge, and creativity to make the company an industry leader,” Hariharan said in a statement.  “It’s disappointing that, while we were working hard to make terrific products that resulted in enormous profits for Lucasfilm, senior executives of the company cut deals with other premiere high tech companies to eliminate competition and cap pay for skilled employees.” Hit the break for the full press release.

Antitrust Class Action Lawsuit Seeks Damages For Workers Harmed By “No Solicitation” Agreements In High-Tech Industry

Adobe, Apple, Google, Intel, Intuit, Lucasfilm, and Pixar Charged With Violating Antitrust Law by Conspiring To Suppress Compensation Of Their Employees

SAN FRANCISCO, CA – (May 4, 2011) – Joseph R. Saveri of the national plaintiffs’ law firm Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP announced that Siddharth Hariharan, a former software engineer at Lucasfilm and founder and CEO of InEarth, today filed a class action lawsuit charging that several of the nation’s leading high-tech companies violated antitrust laws by conspiring to fix the pay of their employees and entering into “No Solicitation” agreements with each other.  The complaint seeks restitution for lost compensation and treble damages for the anti-competitive employment practices of Adobe Systems Inc., Apple Inc., Google Inc., Intel Corporation, Intuit Inc., Lucasfilm Ltd., and Pixar.

“My colleagues at Lucasfilm and I applied our skills, knowledge, and creativity to make the company an industry leader,” stated Mr. Hariharan.  “It’s disappointing that, while we were working hard to make terrific products that resulted in enormous profits for Lucasfilm, senior executives of the company cut deals with other premiere high tech companies to eliminate competition and cap pay for skilled employees.”

“Competition in the labor market results in better salaries, enhanced career opportunities for employees, and better products for consumers,” stated Mr. Saveri.  “We estimate that because of reduced competition for their services, compensation for skilled employees at Adobe, Apple, Google, Intel, Intuit, Lucasfilm, and Pixar was reduced by 10 to 15 percent.  These companies owe their tremendous successes to the sacrifices and hard work of their employees, and must take responsibility for their misconduct.”

Factual Allegations

The complaint alleges the conspiracy among defendants consisted of (1) agreements not to actively recruit each other’s employees; (2) agreements to provide notification when making an offer to another’s employee (without the knowledge or consent of that employee); and (3) agreements to cap pay packages offered to prospective employees at the initial offer.

Starting in 2005 with Lucasfilm and Pixar, and continuing until at least 2009 with all defendants, the companies entered into “No Solicitation” agreements with knowledge of the overall conspiracy and with the intent to reduce employee compensation.  As additional companies joined the conspiracy, competition among participating companies for skilled labor decreased.  Compensation of defendants’ employees was less than what would have prevailed in a properly functioning labor market where employers compete for workers.

The complaint for damages follows an investigation last year by the United States Department of Justice into similar misconduct by defendants.  After that investigation was made public, defendants agreed to end the anticompetitive agreements.  However, no compensation was provided to employees of defendants.  Today’s class action was filed to seek lost pay for the employees who were targeted by defendants’ conspiracy.

The lawsuit was filed in California Superior Court in Alameda County.  Mr. Hariharan seeks to represent a nationwide class of all employees who were harmed by defendants’ unlawful agreements.  A copy of the complaint is attached and available at http://www.lieffcabraser.com/antitrust/case/344/high-tech-workers-class-action-lawsuit

Information for Affected Employees

Current and former employees of Adobe, Apple, Google, Intel, Intuit, Lucasfilm and Pixar who wish to learn more about this lawsuit or to report their experiences in seeking employment and salary increases should visit

http://www.lieffcabraser.com/antitrust/case/344/high-tech-workers-class-action-lawsuit

Or they many contact Lieff Cabraser attorney Dean Harvey at (415) 956-1000 or dharvey@lchb.com.

There is no charge or obligation for our review of your claim.  All information will be kept strictly confidential as provided under law.

22 Comments
  • WTam

    Half of this stuff is probably in your terms and conditions that no one reads. Next people will sign over their homes and earnings without reading… Oh, wait…

    • Lucas

      Salary fixing in your terms and conditions?.. You ever work for a big company other than Mcdonalds?…

      • WTam

        Thats funny. I know a few people who works with Apple after graduating with a CS degree. They were offered a salary of 72k a year or paid per hour at 35 an hour. With salary you do whatever you’re told regardless of how much time it takes. Per hour includes overtime after 40 hours a week. College doesnt teach money management smartest nor does it teach morons to take advantage of their given situation.

      • Bullet Tooth Tony

        I’m pretty sure the response was in regards to you calling a job offer “terms and conditions”…. and the inverse to salary is that yes, you get paid X for a job… it may take 60 hours in a week, it may take 20. That’s the gamble you play…. but salary is guaranteed pay, hourly wage fluctuates. And Voluntary Time Off, and I use that “voluntary” very loosely, they don’t really give much choice, for hourly employees can really throw a budget off…

  • LanceCurtis

    These companies are notorious for also working these employees to death, and on top of all this they do this… Pretty sad… who ever sides with the company on this one is a tool. Sue them .. Fight the good fight.

    • Droidman101

      Google works employees to death? Their whole workplace is a giant playground.

    • KCRic

      Yeah, that mandatory nap time there at Google really hits you hard.

  • Anonymous

    Wait… so how does this mesh with the countless stories about how Google and others are offering HUGE pay incentives to keep their talent for leaving for other companies (notably facebook)

    • Anonymous

      Because facebook wasn’t one of the ones in the deal.

  • Luke Cumwalker

    Welcome to America… ?

  • Anonymous

    Google shouldn’t be included here. Google doesn’t do wrong. EVER! So Siddharth, you better leave Google out of this. Go after Apple all you want, but don’t bother Google!

  • Bullet Tooth Tony

    Yeah…. uhmm… similar job titles command similar pay regionally… it’s a fact of life. And you can look at the ranges on several websites to get a nice gauge. The rest is up to you. Never…. EVER… accept a job offer without negotiating salary, bonus and time off. All you’re doing is making their HR department look like rock stars. Their goal isn’t to make you rich, it’s to get more for less. You need to represent your own best interests. Interviews and job offers are two way affairs…

    • Droidman101

      Can someone sue the overseas oil magnates? The fact that all the prices are the same are a bit suspicious.
      It is for you to decide whether this reply is sarcastic or not.
      kthnxbai

      • Bullet Tooth Tony

        Can I decide that it’s both? Oil prices aren’t driven by supply or demand… but by the fact it’s traded as a commodity… so blame futures traders.

    • Anonymous

      Well, if CocaCola, pepsi and RC got together and decided in your region the appropriate price for soda was $25 a can that would be Ok right? And if they decided to expand it nationally It’s still be ok right? And if it was Merck, Phizer, and Bayer and they were price fixing medication regionally it’s be ok? Price fixing is price fixing, If the big companies are in collusion to limit or cap the pay of employees that’s wildly different than letting the market determine pay, actually that’s the opposite of letting the market determine pay.

      • Anonymous

        Yeah, it’s pretty illlegal, and the courts will favor the employees. It may have been a “gentlemen’s agreement”, but if there’s an email floating around, case closed.

        All these companies will settle privately and sweep it under the rug.

      • Anonymous

        Yeah, it’s pretty illlegal, and the courts will favor the employees. It may have been a “gentlemen’s agreement”, but if there’s an email floating around, case closed.

        All these companies will settle privately and sweep it under the rug.

      • Bullet Tooth Tony

        You’re talking apples and oranges… that’s price fixing of an item for sale – and the market would simply collapse at those prices seeing as 2 liters sell for approx. 1.25-1.50 nationwide and are on sale every other week for much less. These are salaries for jobs. The job market, literally, is regional. “Programmer I” is going to pay roughly the same at every company in an entire region. “Database Specialist II” is going to pay roughly the same at every company in an entire region. “Bank Teller I” is the same story, etc etc etc. These are factored against cost of living, location and, yes, competition. And you’d be surprised how easy it is to find the salaries offered by competition…

        I’ll say it again… each company wants more for less. So a job offer is often either just enough more than your current job to make you think about it, or is near the floor of what the market commands at that given time for base pay. It is up to the prospective employee to negotiate their salary. If they do not do it, tough shit for them. They will lose this battle. The market HAS determined the base pay… that’s why it’s the base pay.

      • LanceCurtis

        Not quite true…

        These were the highly sought after companies that people would work for irrespective of pay… Hell some might work there for free for the chance and opportunity of a lifetime… So it doesn’t surprise me that they accepted the pay they were given for that opportunity… the crappy thing is the collusion between the companies further suppresses the employee here, and leaves them little to no option to either accept a much lower pay, or go work for a small entertainment company or startup…

      • Bullet Tooth Tony

        Always true. I work for a “highly sought after” company… mammoth international presence, in fact, bigger outside the US than inside. 3rd largest of its kind in the world by certain measures, largest in the world by other measures. You negotiate your salary, bonus and time off – you do this even in union shops – if you’re holding a job offer, you’re already hired… the hard work is over. I was in salary negotiation for 6 months for my current job… 6 months. You may think it’s the opportunity of a lifetime… until the next week, when that new higher was hired at 10 grand more than you because he was smart enough to sell himself in the interview for what he deemed appropriate… then you are left, bitter and disillusioned… because every raise going forward is going to be percentage based on that number you started at, which means every raise he gets will be much larger than yours, even if you’re far superior in skill.

        And this isn’t about the inability to ever leave your job… it’s about respecting boundries and not poaching employees from competitors… which is really what the term recruiting is more accurately described as. As in, my companies chief competitor gets my name from a mutual client we both work with. They contact me, because both of our companies are working on an RFP to present to this client… and offer me more money, to both cripple my current companies RFP attempt, bolster their own, and add someone to the client facing team this client is comfortable with and whom can give pricing information on said other company so we can more aggressively go after their clients.

  • JesseC

    I think it is horrible what the companies have done here and any intelligent person can see how salary fixing is not only seriously immoral but illegal. I still think it is a scary move for one guy to take on 7 giant shameless corporations even if it helps the rest of us.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_TA6DPVONLZDN57JNNX6V2CPDYQ Samantha

    Good for this guy for fighting this… To those that don’t really know what this is about or why this is bad, just imagine:

    You
    have your house up for auction, and the base auction price is $100k…
    You don’t know what the fair market price is, but you know it has to be
    >= $100k …

    Now imagine everyone that came to your
    auction decided to cooperate with each other to NEVER outbid anyone…
    Since there are other properties at auction, everyone bidder wins, and
    every property owner loses.

    So now everyone bidding gets the
    property at the minimum price (in this example is $100k)… Still
    unclear as to why what these companies did was wrong?

    It has nothing to do with how much this employee was getting paid!

blog comments powered by Disqus