AT&T makes its case to the FCC regarding T-Mobile acquisition

Business

AT&T on Thursday filed documents with the United States Federal Communications Commission regarding its proposed acquisition of T-Mobile USA from Deutshe Telekom. The potential merger has been strongly opposed by many, such as Sprint, and one FCC official has a hard time believing such a deal could ever be approved. AT&T has a lot to lose of course, so you can believe the carrier is ready for a fight. AT&T’s position is that the merger will push the wireless industry forward by bringing high-speed 4G LTE service to over 97% of the U.S. population — revised up from the carrier’s earlier estimate of 95%. AT&T says its data traffic is growing at a remarkable pace and its proposed acquisition of T-Mobile will allow the carrier to utilize new spectrum and accommodate the rising demand for cellular data. AT&T also says the merger will create jobs and spur economic growth in small towns. Hit the break for the full press release.

AT&T Files Public Interest Statement With FCC on T-Mobile Acquisition

Dallas, Texas, April 21, 2011

AT&T Inc. (NYSE: T) today filed with the Federal Communications Commission its Public Interest Statement regarding its proposed acquisition of T-Mobile USA. The filing demonstrates the numerous benefits of the merger, including the deployment of 4G LTE network technology to more than 97 percent of the population. When the parties announced this transaction in March 2011, AT&T initially stated that it would deploy LTE to 95 percent of the U.S. population. After conducting a more refined analysis of the combined network, AT&T is increasing the scope of this commitment to 97.3 percent. This deployment will help fulfill this Administration’s pledge to connect every part of America to the digital age, and it will create new jobs and economic growth in the small towns and rural communities that need them most.

The publicly available filing, with certain portions containing competitively confidential information redacted, is available at www.MobilizeEverything.com.

Additional highlights of the filing include:

  • AT&T has helped make the United States the global leader in mobile broadband and smartphone sales. AT&T’s mobile broadband leadership, however, presents it with unique spectrum and capacity challenges. A smartphone generates 24 times the mobile data traffic of a conventional wireless phone, and the explosively popular iPad and similar tablet devices can generate traffic comparable to or even greater than a smartphone. AT&T’s mobile data volumes surged by a staggering 8,000% from 2007 to 2010, and as a result, AT&T faces network capacity constraints more severe than those of any other wireless provider.
  • AT&T is using up its spectrum at an accelerating rate, and the wireless broadband revolution is just beginning.  Over the next five years, data usage on AT&T’s network is projected to skyrocket as customers “mobilize” all of their communications activities, from streaming HD video and cloud computing to a range of M2M applications like energy management, fleet tracking, and remote health monitoring. In just the first five-to-seven weeks of 2015, AT&T expects to carry all of the mobile traffic volume it carried during 2010.
  • This merger provides by far the surest, fastest and most efficient solution to that challenge. The network synergies of this transaction will free up new capacity – the functional equivalent of new spectrum – in the many urban, suburban and rural wireless markets where escalating broadband usage is fast consuming existing capacity.
  • This transaction will thus benefit consumers by reducing the number of dropped and blocked calls, increasing data speeds, improving in-building coverage, and dramatically expanding deployment of next-generation mobile technology.
  • The transaction’s benefits arise from the uniquely complementary nature of AT&T and T-Mobile’s GSM/HSPA+ technologies and spectrum holdings.
  • The combined company expects to integrate a significant portion of T-Mobile cell sites into the AT&T network.  Upon network integration, which will benefit customers in as little as nine months, this will equate to “instant” cell splits – increasing cell density and effectively doubling the amount of network traffic that can be carried using existing spectrum in the areas served by those cell sites.
  • Groups across the political spectrum, including a broad range of consumer, disability, civil rights, and rural advocacy groups have highlighted the transaction’s potential to empower consumers, workers and small businesses to participate more fully in our nation’s broadband society.
  • The U.S. wireless marketplace is fiercely competitive, characterized by escalating usage, product differentiation, rapid innovation, fierce advertising campaigns, new entry, and sharply declining prices for wireless service by unit of consumption (e.g., minutes or megabytes). In fact, the FCC found last year that approximately three-quarters of Americans live in localities contested by at least five facilities-based wireless providers.1 These other competitors are rapidly growing and investing and will ensure the wireless marketplace remains vibrantly competitive after the transaction.

1Fourteenth Report, Implementation of Section 6002(b) of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993, 25 FCC Rcd 11407, 11621-22  42-45 (May 20, 2010) (“Fourteenth Wireless Report”).

*AT&T products and services are provided or offered by subsidiaries and affiliates of AT&T Inc. under the AT&T brand and not by AT&T Inc.

32 Comments
  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_GP2WYAHXS6CRUREISWBGPUSUGE Michael

    LIES LIES LIES…

    I like how the only one for this is AT&T corporate.

    • Gcombs11

      The approval will go through just because AT&T said it will create jobs.

    • Capitalism

      I’m for it.

  • http://www.searingarrow.com AlienSix

    Save the BS AFee&Fee, we can see through your crap

    • Capitalism

      You are not smart enough to understand corporate strategy. Who are you kidding?

  • Anonymous

    This is just smoke and mirrors for your average, non-tech-blog reading person. The real wheeling and dealing is going to happen during super-expensive dinners paid for by lobbyists.

    By this time next year, AT&T-Mobile will be a reality.

    • Bull Tech

      And don’t forget the “contributions” they will make to those ass clowns besides the dinners. And anything else their greedy heart desires.

  • http://twitter.com/n8d n8d

    Oh, look how many great things we have done at AT&T!

    BTW, don’t pay attention to any consumer satisfaction polls. JD Power & Associates just don’t like us…

    • SG

      JD Powers is a terrible polling company. That said, being at the bottom of the JD Powers is pretty bad.

    • Blog Retards For Life

      Do you dispute that AT&T has helped make America a leader in broadband technology?

      AT&T created and built (with VZ) the entire communications infrastructure of this country.

      You are a fool and a lemming.

      Grow some original thought…if that’s possible…which I doubt.

      • Bullet Tooth Tony

        Just to add to where you’re going here…

        They also developed UNIX… which of course led to Linux… which of course is what OSX and Android are derivatives of, and Windows is incorporating more and more of its own systems in to… and naturally Linux is also the OS of choice for server farms… so it pretty much powers the internet.

        Nevermind what they did for POTS services… that whole Call Waiting thing, Caller ID, Voicemail, ISDN, *69, etc… but whatever… what do I know anyway? I mean, I only watched American Telephone and Telegraph get dismantled because long-distance rates were too high… only to watch my local phone bill quadruple for a cheaper rate on long distance… but it’s the monopolies that are bad…. right.

      • KCRic

        We’re a leader in broadband? Oh I guess that’s right because the rest of the world uses other, much faster, forms of internet. Yay, we lead in always connected, super compressed dial-up internet!! This is of course what AT&T’s internet is. They refuse to go with cable connections or anything else “but we haz the optics” – oh wow, server to server fiber optics, that really helps if you’re on the inside but running the service via phone lines is a choke point and until they decide to move past 1992 they’ll continue to have the crappiest network out there.

    • http://www.facebook.com/wixostrix WixosTrix

      “BTW, don’t pay attention to any consumer satisfaction polls. JD Power & Associates just don’t like us…”

      This is precisely why they need this deal. AT&T doesn’t have bad customer service, they have a struggling network and people call and complain, but there is nothing a rep can do, therefore the customer is unsatisfied. I’ve been with AT&T for nearly five years and I’ve always had smartphones, they have treated me like a king. However, the quality of the network, in the Bay Area, has take a dive in recent years and it didn’t happen until the iPhone released. My 3G was super fast, now, it’s just okay.

  • Jr

    You gotta love that the say that with their “help” they can fix the capacity issues that plague the cellular services now. hahahaha. Soooo how will taking over TMO help with that? Also, how will charging more money that TMO does “help” consumers and and any capacity issues.

    What a joke and I think the FCC is going to kick them out of the building. Read my words, this will NEVER get approved. If it does, it’s sad times and we’ll know for sure that people in the FCC are taking bribes!

    • Anonymous

      This is just like the tax cuts for the wealthy. “By new extension of current policies, we can expect different results”.

    • Bullet Tooth Tony

      Really? What a dumb question… how will it help? Because they’ll own more spectrum. Limited spectrum forces you to drop calls or lose data connections. Perhaps next time you want to look smart, first develop even the most elementary understanding of what you are discussing.

      • KCRic

        So you’re saying T-Mobile has more spectrum than AT&T does? Since I don’t lose data connections or drop calls (according to your simplified explanation).

        It has nothing to do with AT&T’s business practices. They would never pass up spending money to maintain/improve their network just to hoard money, no, because with AT&T the customer is #1.

        S/

      • Bullet Tooth Tony

        Actually, yeah I am. To be specific, they have more AWS spectrum… AWS being the worldwide standard 2 frequencies for LTE. You know what T-Mo is doing with their nationwide 20 mhz of AWS? Wasting it on HSPA. Know what AT&T has in AWS? 10 mhz west of the Mississippi. Verizon has 20 mhz east of the Mississippi. And Sprint, in bed with the cable companies, has 20 mhz everywhere in the nation except for Montana and the Dakota’s… and maybe not in Idaho. So yeah, lots of companies have more spectrum than AT&T.

        Why doesn’t T-Mo overlay their standard PCS and 850 mhz frequencies with their HSPA? Because they don’t have enough spectrum to let their 2G GSM network operate at the same time. So, combined, AT&T has plenty of spectrum in PCS and 850 to do a large 3G rollout, while T-Mo does not. Combine them in these bands, and now both can have nearly nationwide 3G. Combine both of them for 4G, now they have nationwide coverage in AWS for LTE too. And a merger of them would almost certainly come with a divestiture of markets and redundant spectrum… so Verizon, lacking in the west, would almost certainly benefit in AWS. So now, you’d have 3 companies with nationwide coverage in AWS… 2 nationwide companies in 700… and 1 nationwide company in 800 SMR spectrum after they shut down iDen.

  • http://twitter.com/ismileo Leandro Pena

    Cingular was a great company before AT&T bought them and raised prices on everything.

    AT&T will not create Jobs. History has proven when that when one company buys another, layoffs follow!

    • Adam

      cingular bought att

      • Anonymous

        You forget how many AT&T employees there were vs Cingular that were retained. Cingular got bought through reverse osmosis.

      • Thomas

        Lol

    • Thomas

      At&t did not buy cingular….. Try the other way around.

    • http://twitter.com/danimondi dan imondi

      AT&T didn’t buy Cingular, and their prices went down, not up.

  • http://twitter.com/bc3tech Brandon

    “sharply declining prices for wireless service by unit of consumption ”

    that’s just laughable. i haven’t seen a price drop on my wireless bill since i signed up 5 years ago. taking away unlimited data to charge per mb/gb, throttling, charging for tethering, this is hilarity.

    • Blog Retards For Life

      Yeah, it’s funny when you have a brain, how it works to explain things like this.

      Let’s see for a quick moment….data consumption/traffic (as measured by “unit of consumption” or kb/mb) has increased 5,000% over the last 3 years in this country.

      So by that measure, your $30 unlimited data plan that you cry about like a b*tch should be priced at more than $30, wouldn’t you say? The prices have declined on a net basis, and the consumption has gone through the roof.

      I would not expect a blog retard like you to understand how business works though.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_2BNOIBHBFICJEAPJLGHKK3WHPE DADDY WARBUCKS

    hey i have AT&T, im all for the merger :)

    • Drew

      Yeah we get it, you’re already being raped and sodomize. Misery loves company…

  • Jsantana0793

    I left AT&T because they charge way to much for crapy service. I did’nt think that now I have to look at Sprint instead of staying with T-mobile if AT&T takes over. I will jump ship for sure. I refuse to go back to this nickle a dime company with it’s I don’t care for the customer atitue.

    • Goofansucks

      The ” I don’t care attitude”? Your a joke! Your just like every asshole that thinks a company has bad customer service when you don’t get shit for free or a credit every time you bitch about something! Or just like the assholes that break their phone and don’t take out INS and think they are owed a new one!!! Do you bitch to your cable company demanding credits when your t.v shits out? Of course not, even though they are a ” SERVICE PROVIDER” like cell companies!!! I used to work retail, so on behalf of every one working retail I would like say to all of you people that bitch and complain all the time ” GO FUCK YOURSELVES”

  • CMC

    “Create jobs”? HTF would that happen? They will FIRE thousands of people almost immediately. They’ve done it before. These “elimination of competition” mergers always claim to create jobs, but they never ever EVER do. All of the small retailers that sell T-Mobile services will lose here as they will not be needed by the big behemoth. T-Mobile staff will be fired, the retailers will lose, and of course the biggest losers here are the customers. Gone will be a good value leader. People pay on average nearly $100 per month for a line today. That will only increase and “allotments” will be decreased. The US with only a single GSM provider is pathetically sad.

  • Rdo1mike

    People have you seen the latest quarterly releases? ATT & VZ combined for 3.8 million net new subscribers …… People why aren’t low cost providers making any traction, such as Sprint, T-mobile, Boost etc? The last I checked they already charge higher prices……again, what are people flocking by the MILLIONS? This is a win win for all parties and it will happen. You can always go to Boost, Virgin, Sprint, etc. YOU HAVE CHOICES,

blog comments powered by Disqus