Android loses more ‘open’ cred as Google fights fragmentation

mobile

According to a report filed by Bloomberg Businessweek, Google is beginning to shorten the proverbial leash that Android licensees are currently attached to. Citing “dozens” of industry executives working at “key companies in the Android ecosystem,” the publication writes that Google will need to approve the future Android-plans of its software partners in exchange for early access to upcoming builds of the mobile operating system. “There will be no more willy-nilly tweaks to the software,” reads the report. “No more partnerships formed outside of Google’s purview.”

The report goes on to note that over the past several months, Google has been asking Android distributors to sign a “non-fragmentation clause,” that gives the search giant the “final say” on how manufacturers can “tweak the code.” Bloomberg also casually mentions that Facebook is one of the parties upset about that particular measure, as it has “been working to fashion its own variant of Android for smartphones.”

The article also suggests that Google may have tried to delay the release of Verizon Wireless Android devices that ship with the Bing experience as the default. ”There have been enough run-ins to trigger complaints with the Justice Department,” the report continues.

Google did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Read

153 Comments
  • Dave

    The Applification of Android.

  • Anonymous

    This is the main reason why I refuse to buy a Android Device. To me Android is open for carriers and OEMs to screw the consumers. Why can’t they put all that garbage in the app market and let the customer Decide if they want it or not, kind of what Apple does with Verizon. Letting carriers and OEMs dictate what crap they want to preload on your phone is not what customers are looking for.

    • Bringit

      That is unless you can get it for 99 cents and the 2nd one free.

      • Tim242

        You are paying dearly for your crotch crickets.

      • Bringit

        You obsession with crotches is gay and strange.

      • Tim242

        I’m gay. Go figure. Your obsession with trolling is what is strange. But,
        you are nothing more than a nasty troll. Go figure.

        • Droid X •

    • Larry Mao

      What Google is doing is addressing this. By limiting manufacturer’s ability to skin the UI’s and lock down devices, it gives us end customers more control over the phones we buy, i.e. gets us closer to tru open source. Don’t let BGR’s spin make you think otherwise.

  • bigwh00p

    So they’re switching to what Microsoft is doing with windows phone 7? Who knew that day would cone? Im glad they are though, I’m tired of companies releasing products and being behind on key software updates and fixes (I’m looking at you Samsung and your galaxy line!!!!)

  • Larry Mao

    No, Android is not losing Open Source Cred. If anything, by going after skinned UIs that most times hamper Android and prevent the fast flow of updates to handsets Google is helping to push innovation and the open source nature of the OS. Many Manufacturers, like Motorola, Sony, to a lesser extent Samsung and HTC have used their skinned UIs as excuses to lock down their phones to protect their proprietary code, locking bootloaders and encrypting them to prevent Android users from tampering with them. By restricting the use of these skins/UIs Google is actually helping the end customer, because it gives us greater choice when choosing vanilla android. Moreover, if Google is closing anything, it is the loophole in Android’s open source that allows manufacturers to do whatever they want, while stifling innovation from the Android community of users. What this does, is take that tool out of manufacturer hands, and allow end users to customize (if they so choose) as they see fit. So, gimme a break with these Oh noes, end of Open Source hyperbole.

    End users benefit, as does the open source nature of Android by taking the Open Source out of the hands of manufactuersrs and placing it right back in the hands of the consumer.

    • Bluelou65

      In the end i think you’ll have less and less manufacturers using android if that’s the case. What differentiates HTC from Motorola if the GUI is identical? the camera?

      • Jroc869

        better more reliable hardware is what will set them apart . just because there is no skin on it also doesnt mean they cant tweak the apps that run the camera and offer things like panoramic picture taking or other stuff. i dont buy a phone because of the skin these days, i actually buy them because of the skin that its not running. most people will agree we would rather have stock android verses skinned android then we can customize it the way we want and not the way some manufacturer wants it.

      • Anonymous

        I really do not see what other choice they have than to make Android phones? What else will they do? Make their own OS? They can make a phone with the far less popular Windows mobile, but that is even more locked down.

      • Good!

        Less manufacturers is fine with me. I’d rather have 3 or 4 manufacturers pumping out awesome Android phones than a hundred selling half baked versions.

        I hope this will lead to the manufactures just changing how they go about preparing the phones. Instead of modifying the OS with their Blur or Sense or whatever, they will be forced to make it an app. This shouldn’t detract from the performance at all, and it will allow those of us who prefer vanilla Android to use it on any phone we buy.

        I see a day where we get updates directly from the app store, or pushed from Google. The manufactures then update their overlays and allow those updates to be downloaded as well. Having to wait MONTHS for updates is BS.

      • Jroc869

        Amen to that. I actually can believe i am seeing the day where so many people want vanilla android on their handsets. To me that means Google has made great progress in polishing their OS to the point where skins are just getting in the way. Skins were a necessary evil with the first stages of the OS but now im hoping they are finally going to be a thing of the past.

    • serpentor

      Good point. Android may become less “open” to OEMs, but more open for end users.

  • Anonymous

    good hopefully this leads to more vanilla android devices…

    • Tim242

      Vanilla Android is as boring and bland as iOS.

      • Anonymous

        then download a ui and switch it up but by default android should be vanilla. if a user wants different just download the new ui from the market.

      • Tim242

        Downloading a UI doesn’t give you OS level customizations like Sense
        features, or theming the actual OS.

      • serpentor

        What do you think of WP7 and webOS?

      • Tim242

        WP7 is boring, WebOS is nice, but missing some key customization points,
        like not being able to space icons as you choose.

        • Droid X •

  • http://twitter.com/snookiesnoo Nunya Biznes

    It was entirely predictable that Google, the handset makers, and the carriers would tighten up once they got a critical mass of Android users. None of them want a truly open experience. Not that Android has ever been truly open.

  • http://twitter.com/raitchison Robert Aitchison

    Seems like moves like this can only be good for openness, what they have been doing until now is allowing larger partners to have special access so they can work against the spirit of what Android is supposed to be. People who wanted to release true android devices had to wait for the AOSP release and devices filled with useless (at best) bloat were able to beat them to market.

    I think in the beginning Google was forced to bend on it’s principles to attract manufacturer interest, and as a reward they have situations like Motorloa exploring their own OS so they can spoon feed more manure into consumers hands & eyes than they can with Blur on top of Android.

    Now Android is the market leader, they can afford to hold true to their goals. It would be interesting to see what happens when major companies have to compete with the custom ROM builders if everyone gets access to the OS at the same time. I think that Blur, Sense, TouchWIZ and other nonsense will not be nearly as important if it delays them to market.

  • Rob

    all business models need to change as they grow. apple has reversed many decisions after finding out what is important to users (ie 3rd party compilers). this is not a surprise.

  • Anonymous

    Bait=Free Open Software
    Switch=Free “Open” Software

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_JNKVTT7PJMXPYP2GVCIERBQQCU Andrew

    The best way for Android to continue to move forward as a dominating OS is for Google to exercise more control of their OS. I know people hate on Apple and Jobs about how they are overly protective and referring to as “dictator-ish” in their control but that control also allows them to keep user experience up, consistency among devices and users not having to worry about malicious applications being distributed through it’s own app store. That “closed” ecosystem provides a much better user experience especially for novel smartphone users. Google also needs to start enforcing some control. And that’s ok. They don’t have to be as strict as Apple but they certainly need to be a little less loose than they currently are. That’s the best way to even further the platform and help provide good, consistent user experience across the board.

    • serpentor

      Are you under the impression that Apple’s approval process can guarantee no malicious apps will make their way into the app store?

      • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_JNKVTT7PJMXPYP2GVCIERBQQCU Andrew

        Not guarantee but the level of scrutiny makes it more difficult to get by. With no scrutiny at all you are more vulnerable.

      • serpentor

        To really keep the baddies out they would have to scrutinize code, which they can’t realistically do. It’s not difficult to get a malicious app passed reviewers if a dev really wanted to.

  • http://hip2dahop101.blogspot.com/ Mr. Sinister

    Why don’t the hardware manufactures sell their UI skin in the app market for those who want them for a few bucks and ship out the phones as android stock??

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_JNKVTT7PJMXPYP2GVCIERBQQCU Andrew

    This could also pose challenges for manufacturers who are already struggling to differentiate themselves from other makers. If they are limited on the custom tweaks they can do they that lessens their ability to differentiate.

  • My $0.02

    What all this means is that Google has learned the hard way that giving manufacturers the freedom to embellish their UI to make it look prettier than their competitors’ in order to sell more phones, wasn’t a good idea. Also, that Apple was always right by controlling it’s own hardware, as well as the OS. Some may complain that it’s restrictive, and that the consumer should have control over the way their phone looks/behaves, so they can brag to their friends. Google thought that was the important thing, so it made it’s OS an open source, and considering only the numbers, at the beginning it looked like they were right. Until Android began to fragment. Now they start to realize that the consumer knows nothing about how the phone’s ecosystem works. They just want something pretty to show off. That’s all. Consequently, Android has become a fragmented mess, and now it’s to up to Google to clean it up. Good luck!

  • Booboolala2000

    It’s a good thing. Google got the platform out and now it’s time to tighten the reigns. All in all it will result in a better experience for the end user. And all the whiny babies won’t be able to complain about outdated hardware. Also Google has always hinted that they were going to a yearly update schedule. I do think that Google will release the code to devs.

  • http://twitter.com/fattychance Fattychance

    Good for Google.

    Sometimes you have to pay a little more for the best seats in the house. It’s their right to ask for it.

    Bing and Yahoo should have a right to exist on the platform but Google earned the greater right.

    Microsoft and Bing can get with the hardware manufactures after Google provides the updated sources…which isn’t required until *AFTER* they release the binary code running on a device.

    At the same time, Honeycomb should be out already.

    Google may be rolling their own Linux distro but it’s their obligation to provide source in a timely manner once they release the binaries.

  • Jroc869

    whats killing me is half these people arguing that sense and blur and all those UI’s are better than stock, havent used a stock android phone let alone a phone with gingerbread.

  • Anonymous

    Google and the device makers need to work together to make the stuff that the device makers want to put on top of the OS more independent. This way google updates can be rolled much quicker, so that all devices that can handle the newer versions (most of them can) get the ability to upgrade.

    Google should also highly encourage if not require the ability to removedisable this as well as any other programs installed on the phone. Its one thing to install crapware, its another thing to remove the ability to remove it without root.

  • Anonymous

    And i would agree. Sense does offer improvements over stock. Though it should be able to be disabled for those who do not want it.

  • Seabass

    About time but better late then never. I’m tired of getting phones and having to install a custom ROM so it can run like it was meant to in the first place. All the crap Carriers add just bugs down the phone. Apple hast it right and won’t let the carriers RUIN the user experience.

  • http://twitter.com/gnomehole The Gnome

    So can someone explain to me how they can still use the word “open” with a straight face? I’m certain it is actually still open… but that “kinda open” and “kinda pregnant” thing resonates.

    Now that Google is becoming the same evil overlord most people think Apple is, whats next on the horizon for those that love the little guy and cheer for the real “open” world… ?

  • http://twitter.com/MrUniq78 Christopher

    On one hand this is entirely understandable but on the other hand…welcome to the beginning of evil Google. The truth is the larger Google becomes and the more Google itself uses Android to deliver products to the market this was bound to happen. On the bright side perhaps this will encourage some companies to develop their own OS instead of using a bastard version of Android which is itself incomplete.

    • CMC

      How is this evil? By trying to keep some consistency? Look at all of the different interfaces to Android out there? Every manufacturer seems to have their own. Every carrier seems to have their own “hacks”. There’s only a handful of pure Android handsets out there. A lack of fragmentation is a good thing.

      If anything, I’d love to see Google prevent all of the carrier CRAP and hacks…such as the bloatware that’s forced upon users, and if that crap gets on there, offer a way to remove it without having to root your device.

  • Anonymous

    Google only has 1/3 of the market and this happens, wait till they own the smartphone space, they’ll make Apple look open…

  • keg

    does this mean less bloat?

1 2
blog comments powered by Disqus