NY Attorney General afraid AT&T, T-Mobile merger will increase prices

General

The New York State Attorney General’s office on Tuesday announced that it plans to conduct a thorough review of AT&T’s proposed T-Mobile USA acquisition. The $39 billion deal would reposition AT&T as the nation’s top wireless carrier, though the merger is already being met with substantial opposition. Attorney General Eric Schneiderman may soon be the latest on the list of those opposed to the deal, for fear that the union may drive up wireless service costs for New York residents. “Cell phones are no longer a luxury for a few among us, but a basic necessity. The last thing New Yorkers need during these difficult economic times is to see cell phone prices rise,” said Schneiderman in a statement. “Affordable wireless service and technology, including smart phones and next generation handheld devices, are the bridge to the digital broadband future. We want to ensure all New Yorkers benefit from these important innovations that improve lives.” Hit the jump for the full press release.

A.G. SCHNEIDERMAN TO UNDERTAKE THOROUGH REVIEW OF AT&T, T-MOBILE MERGER

Attorney General to Analyze the Largest Wireless Merger in History for Potential Anti-Competitive Impacts on Consumers and Businesses

Schneiderman: My Office Will Ensure New York Consumers are Protected; Merger Must Not Reduce Access to Low-Cost Options and Newest Broadband-Based Technologies

NEW YORK – Attorney General Eric Schneiderman today announced that his office will undertake a thorough review of AT&T’s acquisition of T-Mobile. The proposed merger would create the nation’s largest wireless company with a total of 130 million subscribers nationwide, opening the door to a near duopoly shared by the merged firm and Verizon.  The Attorney General will analyze the merger for potential anti-competitive impacts on consumers and businesses across New York State.

T-Mobile, a subsidiary of Deutsche Telekom, is a low-cost provider of choice for millions of New Yorkers and currently has 34 million customers nationwide, making it the fourth-largest wireless company in the country. The proposed merger could start a process of consolidation that would lead to two firms – AT&T and Verizon – controlling nearly 80% of wireless subscribers nationwide and dominating the U.S. wireless business.

“Cell phones are no longer a luxury for a few among us, but a basic necessity. The last thing New Yorkers need during these difficult economic times is to see cell phone prices rise,” said Attorney General Schneiderman. “Affordable wireless service and technology, including smart phones and next generation handheld devices, are the bridge to the digital broadband future. We want to ensure all New Yorkers benefit from these important innovations that improve lives.”

Attorney General Schneiderman stressed that some market conditions may differ across the state and highlighted the potential impact of the merger in areas like Rochester, Albany, Buffalo and Syracuse, where there are already fewer wireless options. He is also concerned about the impact on consumers throughout the state, where T-Mobile is a low-cost option. In announcing his review, Schneiderman noted that the impact of the merger is likely to be felt statewide, and that the review will therefore examine all aspects of the likely impact of the merger on consumers and businesses in all affected areas throughout New York.

Attorney General Schneiderman stressed that he will closely scrutinize AT&T’s argument that the merger has the potential to produce some benefits, such as expanding the coverage of AT&T’s next generation broadband wireless network to rural areas in upstate New York that are underserved and have poor wired broadband connectivity. Supporters argue that the merger might improve broadband service for T-Mobile customers by fulfilling some of their spectrum needs through access to AT&T’s advanced network. The Attorney General’s review will weigh the benefits to New Yorkers against the anti-competitive risks posed to them.

38 Comments
  • Jamil Moore

    All I want is UMA still!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    • Qe

      same here must have uma

    • Drew

      Yep, I never understood (..and still don’t) why a carrier who acknowledges that the traffic on their horrid network is strained so much so that you throttle data and put restrictions and caps on consumers when something as simple as implementing UMA would relieve network congestion and make everyone happy. Oh.. wait, that’s right you’re AT$T, you’re lazy and only care about profits…

  • Anonymous

    He just wants his name in the paper; he probably still uses a flip phone or an iPhone.

  • Johnny Wishbone

    I’m going to sprint if this merger gets approved……..and if Sprint is smart, they’d keep their prices low and steal all the TMO ppl who don’t want to see a price increase.

    • Anonymous

      I would jump ship now, Sprint is a much better network anyway; their outsourced Customer dis-Service may suck but, they are a better network. They were also offering a $125 account credit for new customers switching over [dangle preposition]. I, however, would wait for the EVOOOO 3D, June 3, 2011.

      • Anonymous

        Just to clarify for PAPINYC’s sake: That $125 offer applies only until April 15th. So no $125 discounted EVO 3D :P

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_GP2WYAHXS6CRUREISWBGPUSUGE Michael

    As long as ATT leave my plan alone i’ll be happy once they try to imply they methodology i’m out like a fat kid playing dodge ball.

    It will raise prices, it will create a monopoly and it will cost people their jobs. Three things a struggling US economy doesn’t need. I hope people in the right seats will see this.

  • Anonymous

    At&t increase prices? No shit..

  • Bbrownell007

    I want the deal to flop so AT&T can pay 3 billion and hand over the extra spectrum. But I’m also worried that if it fails, DT won’t care about T-Mobile USA. Stuck between a rock and a hard place

    • Skyy_flyer

      I thought part of the problem was DT already doesn’t care about T-Mobile USA?

  • gbugfuture

    Google should just purchase T-Mobile. Problem solved.

  • Anonymous

    I just want a company has more freedom, more reliable, and offer decent price.

  • 1T2dirtnap

    Everyone except BGR thinks this is a bad idea.

    • Ink11011

      BGR obviously got paid to try to sell us all on this bullshit.

  • Anonymous

    Wow it took somebody in office to see the light? Good going Captian Obvious. LOL

    Its only good for AT&T stock holders

  • Anonymous

    If this deal happens kiss data unlimited goodbye!!

    • Rdo1mike

      Everyone is flocking to VZ & ATT anyway…. There prices are higher than that of others….why is that?Sprint is bleeding customers, t-Mobile is bleeding customers, why?Attorney general doesn’t know what he’s talking about. There’s Metro, Leap, Virgin Mobile, Boost…. Just go to one of those low cost, no service providers mentioned above. You have choices people.

      • Ahenderson223

        That is so true you still have options and foe the ones who want lower price points buy your phones out right and that will make them lower there price’s cause now they wont have to recoup the money over two years and it will open jobs tons of them they said they would keep the good workers idk if it was me I would not keep the bad workers I would drop the bad workers and hire new ones they should have done a better job

      • CMC

        There will only one GSM provider in the US. That is NOT choice. That is NOT competition.

      • John

        This is ABSOLUTELY correct, I use GSM, because it’s what the rest of the world uses. I also paid outright for my smartphone and I don’t think it’s right that there would be a GSM MONOPOLY! CDMA (used by all the other carriers in the US) is stupid and doesn’t support simultaneous voice and data, plus, if you leave the US, your phone becomes an expensive PAPERWEIGHT!!! DO NOT LET THEM CREATE A GSM MONOPOLY!

  • Rdo1mike

    Everyone is flocking to VZ & ATT anyway…. There prices are higher than that of others….why is that?Sprint is bleeding customers, t-Mobile is bleeding customers, why?Attorney general doesn’t know what he’s talking about. There’s Metro, Leap, Virgin Mobile, Boost…. Just go to one of those low cost, no service providers mentioned above. You have choices people.

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000722296108 Herman Guerra

      Ummm No.

  • Allen Walker

    So the New York State Attorney General is the latest one to attempt to kill the American dream? Feel free to build up your business as high as we allow it but not any further..

    • http://twitter.com/Alex_YC Alex Chernogaev

      This has literally nothing to do with the American Dream. It’s a mega-corporation buying another corporation. Their CEO’s have already reached the American Dream. This deal would reduce competition and eliminate a low-cost carrier that actually: a) Provides excellent mobile broadband speeds; b) has a nationwide network; c) Has excellent phones available to its customers; and d) has top customer service in the field, while the purchaser is the worst. There would be no point for AT&T to keep T-Mobile’s prices since their added subscriber base, even with flight, would still make it worth the purchase. This is AT&T trying to expand and gain customers and spectrum, and Deutsche Telekom trying to unload T-Mo USA. The American Dream has nothing to do with this. Unless oligopolies are your definition of the American dream.

  • att ct

    You people are idiots. Why would at&t jack their rates? If you haven’t noticed Sprint and T-Mobile are the cheapest and Verizon & at&t are pretty much the same across the board. Why would they put themselves out of the game? Even if what they say actually happens and they do have the best service what does it matter? You people know nothing about business. Its good that we have the same apple but yours is 25cents and mine is $10.00 – IDIOTS.

    • guest

      Calling people idiots because you can’t logically defend your company always works. We’ll ALL see the light now and recognize AT&T is THE best carrier ever!! Not. Come back when you have a valid argument.

      • Rdo1mike

        I gave you a valid argumenet. There are plenty of options if you don’t like ATT or VZ. Excercise them. Everyone is in the game to make money, TMOBILE is losing money as is SPRINT, this ATT is buying them out. This way TMOBILE makes money (sale price plus 8% stake in ATT) and ATT makes out because they get customers and the SPECTRUM so desperately needed.
        Why do people flock to VZ? The “network” right? Theres a premium for that….so now ATT stepped up its game….you want cheap GO TO METRO PCS OR BOOST….PERIOD!

      • Guest

        So let me ask you something; what does AT&T offer that the others don’t? You say Verizon has the best coverage, which isnt debatable and is part of why Verizon service is “premium.” So lets hear it. It’s obviously not AT&T coverage since they’re so desperately needing T-Mobile spectrum. Even if it’s for LTE it’s supposed to boost their 3G network too. Also, rollover minutes doesnt count as a “premium.” So why pay more to use AT&T when you save a little money and use T-Mobile? You get better customer service and AT&T coverage isn’t really better than T-Mobile coverage at all.

      • John

        Do the words GSM MONOPOLY have any meaning? this is why some of us CAN’T move to VZW or sprint. They are CDMA. Leave the country, and any CDMA phone is a paperweight. Add to that, GSM is a world-wide standard. Keep your phone, roam anywhere. Oh and did I mention that CDMA is retarded – you can’t use data while engaged in a voice call? ie. you’re using your phone as a wifi hotspot and your on the phone at the same time with someone while you lookup directions or other info? GSM is quite smart like that.

  • Anonymous

    What a bad title…

  • Anonymous

    Far, far more important than the US network that AT&T will have is what T-Mobile will be doing in Europe with their $39 million. This willl push T-Mobile a long way forward, I think.

  • CMC

    Of course it will increase prices. When Cingular bought AT&T Wireless Services, they increased prices, for both voice and texting. Verizon immediately followed. When Sprint bought Nextel, they also increased prices. Eliminating competition always increases prices. That’s the de facto reason to buy a competitor. Especially a value leader.

  • http://twitter.com/Steelers7510 Ty Carlson

    Umm excuse me but the last thing that ANYONE needs if for cell phone prices to rise.

  • @j_nathaniel

    There is reason for concern here. I am happy to see that this potential merger is not simply being rubber stamped…at least not yet :|

    It may not be a bad merger at all but I want to see rules in place and set expectations to guide consumers. Mobile devices have become a necessity for most of us and have effectively replaced landlines. Having too much control with one or two companies rarely works out well.

  • Anonymous

    The real competition to AT@T and Verizon is coming from the prepaid industry. The prepaid resellers like Net10 already use the AT@T, Verizon and T Mobile towers, and they are the ones who are gaining customers, because people are sick of being ripped off on contracts. As long as these prepaid companies still have access to the towers, they will be the major competition.

  • Coveragelover

    The 45 on BGR that dont want the merger to happen – should gather their nickles and buy TMOBILE – then they can give free uncapped services to everyone. please……….

  • Anthony wilson

    Tell me what’s up with this BLT-739-CALLER ID SCREENER-An Easier Way To Decide Which Calls To Take. Ensures that each time phone rings it’s something of importance. Guides unwanted callers to a separate voice mail service, they’ll never know their number has been blocked. That will eliminates the need to monitor caller ID services. Now that’s what’s up I like that. 

blog comments powered by Disqus