The Grey Lady builds a pay wall; New York Times to charge for online content after March 28th

Services

In a post on the publication’s web site today, The New York Times announced its intentions to move to a paid subscription model — often referred to as a “pay wall” — for access its online content beginning on March 28th. Currently being tested in Canadian markets, the paper plans to provide users with a small sampling of Times content each month for free, after which readers must pay for access. “On NYTimes.com, you can view 20 articles each month at no charge (including slide shows, videos and other features),” writes Arthur Ochs Sulzberger, the site’s publisher. “After 20 articles, we will ask you to become a digital subscriber, with full access to our site.” The company’s mobile application users will still be able to access all articles in the “Top News” section free of charge, but access to other content will require a subscription. “If you are a home delivery subscriber of The New York Times, you will continue to have full and free access to our news, information, opinion and the rest of our rich offerings on your computer, smartphone and tablet,” continues Sulzberger. The subscription plans will range from $15 to $35. The move may be an attempt to push digital consumers back towards the traditional print medium. Home delivery of The New York Times is roughly $8 per week, making a four week subscription ($32) — which includes free access to all digital Times mediums — slightly cheaper than the digital-only “All Digital Access” offering ($35). The announcement did not specify if those paying for digital content would still be subjected to online advertising.

Read

29 Comments
  • http://evanjacobs.net/ Evan Jacobs

    From $15 to $15?

  • Anonymous

    Major bummer. I enjoy the NY Times website. Oh well.

  • http://twitter.com/wunderbar Tyler Hardeman

    They mean $15-$35.

    I would *maybe* consider $5/month. at the $20/month sub I’d likely need based on how I currently use the NYT, there is simply no way I will pay that. I can get similar or better content form many other sources for free or significantly cheaper.

  • Rich

    digging their own grave…

    • Anonymous

      +1, I will dig for my copy of NYT in the subway recycle bin.

  • whocares

    They tried this once before and it failed miserably. I wonder what has changed in the market to make them think this will succeed? The economy is boned after all with people looking to cut expenses.

    Given that they are just a general news gathering service what makes their costly new product any better than other free sites such Wapo? LATimes? Blogs? NYT isn’t the Wall Street Journal after all. At least with WSJ, you might read something to encourage you to invest money in a stock or bond. Not so with the NYT.

  • Chut Pata

    I do not pay newspapers in exchange for the corporate propaganda they dump on me. Corporate media is part of Corporate America just like corporate bankrolled politicians and judges.

    Those who take authority (in this case Corporate America) as truth, gets enslaved by them. Those who take truth as authority, get free from mental slavery.

    • Baimo

      wow . that is the coolest thing i have ever heard. I dont know what it means but it sure sounds like you do!

    • the Dude

      I bet you have a commercially made t shirt of che guevara, huh.

  • serpentor

    I doubt they’ll do away with online ads for subscribers. It’s not like take out the ads when you pay for the paper version.

  • Fat Mams

    I enjoyed going to NYTimes every once in a while. Looks like I will be taking that off my online things to do list.

  • Anonymous

    In other news: NYT ad revenue will drop massively, even though Rupert Murdoch will claim great success while refusing to give any specific figures.

    Sorry, Grey Lady… prepare to crash and burn (at least online).

  • http://twitter.com/raitchison Robert Aitchison

    No problem, I’ve avoided NYT content for years because their registration requirement is so annoying.

  • http://twitter.com/jparismd Jason Paris

    just hurry up and die. long live the new media.

  • Jackson

    Shit if this was a magazine by Apple you all would be buying it and you know it. Plus BGR would have a few more stories on it.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Dan-Carter/500179789 Dan Carter

    Hahaha what? What?

    Seriously. What?

    So…..I could pay three times as much as I pay for my Nextflix account…or just go down the street to the Washington Post, or one of the other 6 million news outlets for the city of New York.

    I like the Times, but wtf?

  • Wayne

    You say “Home delivery of The New York Times is roughly $8 per week, making a four week subscription ($32).” Actually, here in Colorado, we pay over $50 per month for a 7-day subscription, so this is a good deal for us.

  • George Ott

    Let’s see if they are even smart enough to stop the “Clear Cookies and get 20 more free articles ” hack.

  • Anonymous

    LOL

  • Eludium Q36

    Never really liked the NY Times anyway –> NYDailyNews, NYPost, Yahoo News, WashingtonPost, WashingtonTimes, HuffingtonPost, USAToday, all the network news sites, etc. PLENTY to choose from that have EQUIVALENT content and value. There’s not one element of the NYTimes that is must-have for me.

  • http://twitter.com/JoeGodwin Joseph Godwin

    Any of the home subscriptions work for the unlimited access. From the NYTimes FAQ:

    “Free, unlimited access is provided to all print subscribers, no matter what type of subscription you have (daily, weekday, Weekender, etc.). You’ll also qualify for free digital access if your home delivery is provided by a third party (rather than by The New York Times directly).:

    So the $3.70 a week Mon-Fri edition is the best deal at $14.8 a month. One gets the paper 5 days a week and unlimited access…of course you have to throw away the paper!

  • sirpaul

    Is there a reason why print+digital is cheaper than digital alone? Maybe because of ads in the paper? You’d hope they’d try to eliminate print to do a little bit more regarding waste and the environment.

    • http://twitter.com/JoeGodwin Joseph Godwin

      Found the catch the $3.70 price is an 8 week introductory price. After the 8 weeks it goes to $7.40 a week or $29.60 a month. Still cheaper for full access, but not cheaper than web only.

  • David

    Newspapers are dead. I canceled my SJ Merc News paper last year. Now I get phone calls from them due to their desperation to get some subscribers back. The internet and TV provides the bulk of one’s news. We don’t need newspapers, be it in paper form, or shown on an electronic device such as tablets. And the NYT in particular, is a biased source of news anyway. Die, already!!

  • Skyy_flyer

    Why would anyone pay to view news on something that has internet access and thus have access to FREE news from sites such as Yahoo, CNN, etc.? I just don’t get it I guess.

  • http://twitter.com/khaminsenz Feed Back

    Two words: No chance.

    If this is the thinking common out of head management, you need to replace your executive team.

  • jay_max

    Then does the paid version have no advertisements?

    If you want to give content for free, I’m ok with adverts, because you need to make some revenue. But if I’m paying a subscription, which you know with the Times will be expensive, then there had better not be one ad anywhere on the site.

  • http://twitter.com/axlahn Sam Ahn

    This isn’t gonna fly well for the NYT. I guess they REALLY want to sell their papers and all the local ad revenue they get from that. I highly doubt the paid digital content will be ad free as well. There’s SO SO SO SO SO SO many sources for news today, I guess I’ll just go somewhere else. (I, and probably most people out there, get their news from aggregators anyways). Good luck NYT.

    [sigh *** Once again...content providers pricing themselves out of the game...]

  • Vin

    Their content is not worth that much to me. I can get my news elsewhere online for free and will do that. Don’t get me wrong, I enjoy reading some of their pieces, but they are not that special that I would fork over $15 a month. See ya

blog comments powered by Disqus