45,000 tests prove Android surfs faster than the iPhone

mobile

A recent study performed by Ottowa-based Blaze Software reveals that Android’s mobile Web browser is significantly faster than the mobile Safari browser found on Apple’s iPhone. Blaze performed 45,000 separate tests using 1,000 different websites along with its mobile measurement service, and found that Android was 52% faster on average. The firm utilized the latest Android devices running Android 2.2 and Android 2.3 in the tests, and pitted them against iPhone 4 handsets running both iOS 4.2 and iOS 4.3. “We were very surprised by the results,” said Blaze CTO and Co-founder Guy Podjarnyin a statement. “We assumed that it would be closer race and that the latest JavaScript speed improvements would have a more material impact on performance. The fact that Android beat iPhone by such a large margin was not expected.” Hit the break for the full press release.

iPhone vs. Android – 45,000 Tests Prove Whose Browser is Faster

Ottawa, ON, March 17, 2011 – Blaze Software Inc released today the largest ever research study of smart phone browser performance. The purpose of the study was to determine once and for all which of the two leading smart phone vendors has the fastest browser.

Mobile Web browser usage is exploding. Emarketer estimates that 44.1% of US citizens will leverage mobile Internet by 2014. To capture market interest in mobile browsing, smart phone vendors have been aggressively touting the speed improvements in their products. However, due to the lack of mobile measurement tools, it has been difficult to measure which smart phone actually has the faster browser.

After taking over 45,000 measurements on the latest iPhone and Android devices, the study found that Android was 52% faster than iPhone on average. Android finished loading a Web page faster on 84% of the 1000 Websites tested. The study also found that the despite significant JavaScript performance gains in the latest Apple iOS 4.3 release and Google Android 2.3 releases, these improvement made no measurable improvement on the actual page load times of the sites tested.

“We were very surprised by the results”, said Guy Podjarny, Blaze CTO and Co-Founder. “We assumed that it would be closer race and that the latest JavaScript speed improvements would have a more material impact on performance. The fact that Android beat iPhone by such a large margin was not expected”.

What makes this study unique is the size of the study and the fact that it used real phones on real world websites to make the measurements. Past studies have often used fabricated benchmark sites or manual measurements on a small number of sites. This study was made possible through custom apps developed to measure page load time on mobile devices. These apps run on the actual devices, load a page on demand, and measure how long it took. These agents are available as a free service to measure any site with the Blaze Mobitest Tool.

Detailed blog post on the Blaze Mobile Measurement Study
For more information on the details results and methodology of the study, please see: www.blaze.io/blog

For more information on the Mobile measurement service
Blaze’s mobile measurement service can be found at: www.blaze.io/mobile

About Blaze
Blaze was founded in 2010 with a mission to help clients deliver better performing Web businesses by optimizing websites to increase website speed.  Blaze provides a hosted Web Performance Optimization service that improves frontend performance and reduces operational costs. For more information, see: www.blaze.io

114 Comments
  • El Tigre

    Who cares? The average consumer obviously doesn’t. If Iphone becomes available on Sprint and Tmobile, Android can kiss its sales goodbye. Apple wins out because it does what the average user wants it too, and they will not notice the speed difference much because what the average user does on the web, the iphone is fast enough, especially the new ios3 build.

    • Anonymous

      The pricing is still on androids favor. I’d like to see apple come out with 2 redesigns. iPhone 5 and iPhone 4 both get introduced in June so you can have markets on two price points

  • Lookingforashaker

    Whey two spel Ottowa rong.

  • http://twitter.com/homescrub homescrub

    lol, umad.

  • Anonymous

    This test was obvious to me as I own/have owned multiple Android devices. However, scrolling around on a loaded page is not always faster. My GF has an iPhone4 and my daily is a Nexus One with CM7.

  • http://www.bgr.com Andrew Munchbach

    The only time posts get kicked to us is if they contain links. 99.8% of the pending comments I’m looking at right now are for Viagra, %0.1 are for Cialis, and the other %0.1 are legit :)

    Just don’t include a link next time and it should go through.

  • dwinsmith

    The testing methodology is flawed just as much as the headline. An Android phone is faster than the iPhone 4 which runs at 800MHz despite having a 1GHz processor. So even if the testing was done properly, taking into account the current issues with WebClips not using Nitro on iOS 4.3, this would still be an unfair and unbalanced comparison. This test does not in any way prove that the Android browser is faster, just that it was on this device in this test.

  • Fat Mams

    Please go cry somewhere else Apple fan boys. I happen to think my PC (XPS15) and phone (Atrix) are entertainment and work devices. I care about speed and cost, not image, logos and brand.

    If put a new Macbook Pro in a bear trap in Soho, how many hipsters do you think I could get in 10 minutes ..

  • QNX Please

    PWNED!

  • QNX Please

    It’s Ottawa btw… BGR Fail

    • Drew

      …And some 10hrs later it’s still not fixed. Awesome work!!

  • http://theworldgrowsold.wordpress.com/ Mundus Senescit

    Android FTW

  • Anonymous

    iPwnt

  • http://twitter.com/thedailytechco The Daily Tech

    quite surprising, given the fact that apple had integrated the nitro javascript engine into their mobile safari. not surprised that android was faster, but more surprised by the fact that it was 52% faster

  • Nikatnight

    I have an iPhone 4 and an atrix and they are pretty close every time. If either one wins it’s because one loads an optimized webpage while the other loads the normal one (like cnet). Or the margin by which they win is very small. And that is a 9month old iPhone on 4.3 vs a dual core top of the line android phone.

    I work at at&t and get the unique opportunity of trying this out on every phone that comes through my store, including my galaxy s (rooted with laggix) and inspire. Apple wipes the floor with everyone else easily and scrolling and zooming is so smoothe compared to android.

    Ps, I prefer android.

  • Anonymous

    look at how many logos and crap are on your phone. the camera says it’s HD, motoblur and at&t are etched in the back, and the front has a huge motorola logo. and apple devices run a lot smoother on all fronts (including your pc).

  • Anonymous

    i have an atrix 4g and an iphone 4 and the iphone beats it most of the time when web browsing. this “test” is bs to me.

  • p2k

    Wait a sec… Let me get this straight…

    They tested the latest android hardware VS. the almost 1 year old IP4, and the android was faster? Really? BIG SURPRISE…

    So whats the latest android hardware? Probably the Atrix, so its like Dual-Core vs. Single core.

  • DroidDoesnt

    ahhh… the iphone is about 3 years old and still clearly the best phone… android phones break after 6 months… and are still playing catch up… while Mr. Jobs sits back and laughs… why? because he figured it all out…

  • Anonymous

    So
    Android Still Sucks

1 2
blog comments powered by Disqus