RIM calls iPhone ‘badly flawed’ ahead of launch

mobile

When Apple first launched its iPhone in 2007, the odds were against it. Pundits, bloggers and even competitors found countless faults in the iPhone’s design and in Apple’s strategy. A new report from Reuters notes that one such competitor was BlackBerry maker Research In Motion. The report quotes an anonymous RIM employee as saying RIM thought the iPhone was “so badly flawed from day one,” and “users wanted great battery life, great security, great mail handling, minimal network use, and a great keyboard experience.” As it turns out, many users appear to have had different priorities. RIM wasn’t entirely wrong, of course, and the original iPhone was lacking in several key areas. While hindsight is 20-20 and the first-generation iPhone could have been better in countless ways, it was enough to propel Apple to its current position as the leader in smartphone profit share by a staggering margin.

[Via Business Insider]

Read [PDF]

90 Comments
  • BrokenServer

    Maybe it’s an article that hit posted back in 2007 and it finally decided to post today

  • Anonymous

    Wow. People don’t actually read the linked articles, do they? The Business Insider piece and the Reuters report on which it is based, were published March 15, 2011. This little nugget is just one part of an analysis of RIM’s prospects in the tablet marketplace. But why actually read something and use your brain when you can engage in some mindless iOS/Android/RIM bashing and anonymous ad hominem attacks instead?

  • Andrew

    This isn’t news… EVERY ONE called the original iPhone lacking in some regard. Maybe most famously by Balmer…

  • http://twitter.com/clientsfromhell Mr Multimedia

    This website is almost as bad as RIM in the sense it’s stuck in the past with not much new to offer to its audience.

    *yawn* z z Z

  • anonymous

    what a weird thing for RIM to say about iPhone’s battery life since Blackberry aren’t known for it’s long-lasting battery life either

1 2 3
blog comments powered by Disqus