Apple to ‘crack down’ on in-app payment policy violators

mobile

On Tuesday, we reported that Sony’s eBook reader app for iOS had been rejected by Apple. The reason Apple gave for the rejection was that Sony’s app violated an app store policy — one that has historically not been enforced — dealing with apps that offer content for sale through means other than Apple’s in-app purchase mechanism. By using their own distribution systems, developers have been able to sell content from within iOS apps without having to pay Apple’s 30% commission charged for iTunes-based in-app purchases. An Apple spokesperson later gave a comment, stating that Apple is “now requiring that if an app offers customers the ability to purchase books outside of the app, that the same option is also available to customers from within the app with in-app purchase.” Following the ordeal, The Wall Street Journal on Wednesday reports that developers have begun to receive notices that apps in violation of this policy will be rejected starting March 31st. This could mean existing apps like Amazon’s Kindle eBook reader, which sends users to a mobile website in order to make purchases, could run into problems unless they are updated to offer content through iTunes. According to the Journal, the only exception to the rule that will be made is for publishers wishing to give print subscribers free access to an iPad edition.

Read

14 Comments
  • Anonymous

    Without Jobs, sounds like Apple is boxing itself into a corner — compared to everybody else.

  • Bert

    What a crock. Assuming Amazon goes along and allows the in-app purchase, I am going to make a point to buy from the website just so Apple doesn’t get it’s greedy little hands on it. Next Apple will want a cut from software developers for every DVD used to install software on a Macbook.

  • Anonymous

    1984. It’s a long way from there to here … but you’re the big screen now, baby …

  • http://bit.ly/samirsshah समीर शाह

    “ઘો મરવાની થાય ત્યારે વાઘરીવાડે જાય” (Gujarati Proverb)

  • http://bit.ly/samirsshah समीर शाह

    “ઘો મરવાની થાય ત્યારે વાઘરીવાડે જાય” (Gujarati Proverb)

  • http://www.bloise.co.uk Frankie Bloise

    Isn’t this monopoly practices?

  • Bulldogbobby

    Why should Apple host your application and then the app takes you to the web to make a purchase that Apple sees not a penny. If this was your business what would you do? 30% maybe a little high for publishers, but I don’t hear other developers bemoaning that because they are making money. Didn’t android indicate they are going to do in-app purchases, are they not trying to emulate Apple’s model. Let’s wait and see what they do with publishers, oh google will make money from the adds.

    • Bert

      Ok Apple fanboi let’s look at this. Apple already gets a cut from any sales of the app- assuming there is a cost. For free Apps, they benefeit by beeing able to brag about the number and variety of apps available to them. Have a diverse number of apps is a strong selling point for the Ipad and Iphone and Itouch. Further, with iads, Apple often IS making money on the ads, just like Google. Now imagine if Microsoft said they wanted a cut on any internet transaction since it is their software (IE or Windows) that is hosting the transaction? Just plain greed and Apple wanting to control everything. If they are not careful they will end up with teh DOJ all over them for anti-trust practices.

  • Test

    i’m curious if there’s anything in the Apple TOS that requires price equality? Paypal for example forbids charging users extra for accepting Paypal payments… What about Apple? Can developers charge 30% extra (or whatever) when a user buys content through the Apple platform vs. their normal web store?

    It would be interesting if Amazon Kindle books were $9 online and $12 through the iPhone/iPad app.

  • Anonymous

    So raise in-app prices by 30% and keep out of app prices the same. Or move the Kindle from an app to a web service.

    Apple never misses a chance to repeat the Wintel debacle.

    • Anonymous

      It would actually be 43% (to make $10, you have to charge $14.30). The problem is, the agency pricing model forced on Amazon by the Apple/publisher cabal sets the price and then gives 70% to the publisher. If Apple takes the other 30%, Amazon gets nothing for an in-app purchase. I guess Amazon could keep the Kindle app on iOS and sell the books for nothing in the hopes of boosting the Kindle ecosystem, but why would they?

  • Rhonin

    If I was one of these impacted developers I would add the in-app purchase ability with the following caveat:
    “To save 30% in the cost of your in-app purchase, use this link to our web site – thank you”

    Another reason I can see for now enforcing this is the lackluster purchases in the iBook area.

  • http://twitter.com/livingbasehead Shelton

    Stupid question, anyone know if they are taking issue with movie ticket apps? I wanna be able to buy movie tickets on mah phone.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_I7YQY6U3YQUV3XKVOXN5IMQMZE Johnny

    Apple is a bunch of greedy Pineapples. They will burn in Fruit Hell !!!

blog comments powered by Disqus