Android dethrones Symbian as No. 1 smartphone OS, says Canalys

mobile

Canalys today becomes the first major firm to report a changing of the guard we all knew was coming. According to the industry watcher’s fourth-quarter 2010 data, Google’s Android platform outsold Nokia’s Symbian OS to become the best-selling smartphone platform in the world. Canalys’ figures show 32.9 million Android-powered smartphones having been shipped last quarter, while Symbian device shipments slid in at 31 million units. In terms of market share, Android reeled in 32.9% of the market in the fourth quarter while Symbian owned 30.6% of the market. This marks the first time in 10 years that another smartphone operating system has outsold Symbian — and as fast as Android is growing, it most definitely will not be the last. Other notable takeaways from the report: Apple shipped 16.2 million smartphones to take 16% of the market, down 0.1% from the same quarter in 2009, and RIM’s global market share slid from 20% in the fourth quarter of 2009 to 14.4% last quarter. Despite losing ground in market share, Apple and RIM both saw year-over-year growth in terms of device shipments — up 85.9% and 36%, respectively. Hit the break for Canalys’ full press release.

Google’s Android becomes the world’s leading smart phone platform

- Canalys reveals smart phone market exceeded 100 million units in Q4 2010

Palo Alto, Singapore and Reading (UK) – Monday, 31 January 2011
For immediate release

Canalys today published its final Q4 2010 global country-level smart phone market data, which revealed that Google’s Android has become the leading platform. Shipments of Android-based smart phones reached 32.9 million, while devices running Nokia’s Symbian platform trailed slightly at 31.0 million worldwide. But Nokia did retain its position as the leading global smart phone vendor, with a share of 28%. The fourth quarter also saw the worldwide smart phone market continue to soar, with shipments of 101.2 million units representing year-on-year growth of 89%. The final quarter took shipments for the year to fractionally below 300 million units, with an annual growth rate of 80% over 2009 (see table below).

In Q4 2010, volumes of Google OS-based smart phones (Android, OMS and Tapas) were again boosted by strong performances from a number of vendors, notably LG, Samsung, Acer and HTC, whose volumes across these platforms grew 4,127%, 1,474%, 709% and 371% respectively year-on-year. HTC and Samsung together accounted for nearly 45% of Google OS-based handset shipments.

‘2010 has been a fantastic year for the smart phone market. After a difficult 2009, the speed with which the market has recovered has required real commitment and innovation from vendors and they have risen to the challenge,’ said Canalys VP and Principal Analyst Chris Jones. ‘But vendors cannot afford to be complacent. 2011 is set to be a highly competitive year with vendors looking to use new technology, such as dual-core processors, NFC and 3D displays, to differentiate their products and maintain value.’

At a regional level, Europe, the Middle East and Africa (EMEA) remained the largest market, with shipments totalling 38.8 million and a year-on-year growth rate of 90%. Nokia continued to lead in EMEA and Asia Pacific, but in 2010 it was overtaken by RIM in Latin America, which shipped over a million more units than Nokia in Q4 2010. The vendor was particularly helped by the popularity of its mid-range smart phones, such as its Curve family of devices.

The United States continued its reign as the largest country market in terms of shipments, at more than double the size of the Chinese smart phone market. RIM recaptured first place from Apple, as the latter experienced its usual US seasonal dip, and RIM benefited from the first full quarter of shipments for the BlackBerry Torch. HTC successfully maintained its third-place ranking in the US for the third consecutive quarter, driven by its speed to market with the latest Android updates and new Windows Phone 7 devices.

‘The US landscape will shift dramatically this coming year, as a result of the Verizon-Apple agreement,’ said Canalys Analyst Tim Shepherd. ‘Verizon will move its focus away from the Droid range, but the overall market impact will mean less carrier-exclusive deals, while increasing the AT&T opportunity for Android vendors, such as HTC, Motorola and Samsung.’ Android was by far the largest smart phone platform in the US market in Q4 2010, with shipments of 12.1 million units – nearly three times those of RIM’s BlackBerry devices. Windows Phone 7 devices appeared too late in the quarter to take full advantage of holiday season purchasing. As a result, Microsoft lost share in the United States, from 8% in Q4 2009 to 5% in Q4 2010.

Analysis of the published country-level data shows that, around the world, the strength of smart phone performances remained diverse. In South Korea, for example, shipments grew from under 700,000 units in Q4 2009 to just under 3.4 million units in Q4 2010, making the country a top 10 market. In Japan, Android shipments have taken off over the past year, with nearly 1.4 million units shipping from local as well as international vendors, such as HTC. More Japanese vendors have also announced plans to launch Android devices in 2011, such as NEC Casio and Panasonic. Under pressure from Huawei and Samsung in particular, Nokia’s share in China slipped to 56%, down from 76% a year ago, despite growing its volume in the country by over 70% in the same period. Albeit from a smaller base, the Chinese market grew 134% year-on-year, notably faster than the US market, which grew at 64% in the quarter.

Canalys analysts in Asia Pacific, the Americas and EMEA are available for press interviews on topics related to mobile devices and the growing ecosystem for mobile applications and services. There will also be a significant Canalys analyst presence at Mobile World Congress in Barcelona from 14 to 17 February. To arrange an interview, please send a request to press@canalys.com. Photos and bios of analysts are available from the Canalys web site.

Canalys Smart Phone Analysis, Quarterly Shipment Data

55 Comments
  • WTF

    That little green guy did what??

    • http://twitter.com/usemeego meegouser

      Android got boosted by 2million imaginary Samsung Galaxy Tab sales and other 3G-enabled non-phones running Android. Strategy Analytics show the real numbers with Nokia still on top.

      This Android figure also included the OMS and Tapas dumb phone forks of Android currently being used by China Mobile. Have a look at an OMS and Tapas mobile then get back to me about it being a ‘smartphone’.

  • Floozy_niki

    They both suck.

    • Anonymous

      iHater.

  • Anonymous

    Rock on Android! Rock on!

  • Anonymous

    even though its not my OS of choice i can only congratulate the green fellow

    • Anonymous

      This is what I like to see — people not being hateful/jealous of another OS when its doing really well. Just appreciating what a platform has done in a short period of time.

  • Anonymous

    Go Google, and this is why Vz finally received the iphone I would bet

    • Donny

      Yeah or because Apples exclusivity contract with At&t was up, but I mean whatever keeps you from becoming completely unhinged with android fanboyism.

      • serpentor

        You’re a troll or you just know nothing that’s fact.

        AT&T had a 5 year exclusive. Iphone was introduced in 2007. DO.THE.MATH.

        VZW had to pay Apple a shit load of money, which I’d guess was used to pay off AT&T to get out of the exclusivity early.

      • Tee

        Yeah… that or the huge lawsuit filed back in May regarding said exclusivity has led them to mutually end the deal, thus dodging a large bullet. “plaintiffs have argued that even customers fulfilling their two-year contracts with AT&T for the iPhone are unable to switch carriers and continue using their handsets, effectively locking them in to AT&T for longer than their signed contract unless they are willing to switch phones.” I’m sure that has nothing to do with anything, right? It’s all because Verizon paid them, not because they stood to lose more than they gained had this arrangement continued…

      • serpentor

        @Tee

        I remember something about a lawsuit. But if that’s what plaintiffs are arguing, then how is that different from any phone you get that’s locked?

      • Donny

        That contract that said 5 years is not proven any where in…REALITY. It was a rumor on many tech sites but in the end it was just a rumor. And even if it was 5 years the contract is currently void. But either way, android sucks and you smell like poo. Seriously do you cry and throw a fit every time someone criticizes android?

      • Anonymous

        The contract would have to had been signed in 2006 (if not 2005) because of the development cycle.

        But that isn’t the reason Veruzon got the iPhone. Verizon got the iPhone because AT&T was eating their lunch with the iPhone.

        You can easily tell who the begging party was in this deal…….. How much Verizon branding is on the iPhone 4???

      • Tee

        @Donny- the 5 year exclusivity contract was confirmed when the lawsuits were filed…

        @serpentor- the difference here, is that you buy into a proprietary environment… and make additional micro-transactions of apps that you “own”… but can only be used on an iPhone/iPod Touch. So while you have purchased these apps, your 2-year contract becomes by default a 5-year contract because you can not escape with your phone, or your apps. Other “locked” phones, they will gladly unlock for you… after your contract expires. With the iPhone, it was never going to happen…

      • serpentor

        @Tee

        If that’s the case, AT&T and Apple can easily rectify this by allowing unlocks after contract.

        But how would a VZW iPhone change anything? It’s not like you can take your AT&T iPhone with you after your contract is up and use it on VZW.

  • Anonymous

    Wow, that’s like 370,000 per day. Not too shabby.

    • Anonymous

      Imagine if it was 377.00 per day like that other company.

      • Tim242

        And yet that other company is way down that list, and dropping. Hate to break your heart, but THIS IS ABOUT SMARTPHONES! There are not 377,000 iphones being activated. It’s funny watching you squirm and grasp at straws. Almost as fun as seeing history repeat itself. This time, there won’t be anything left to save crapple. Then you’ll be a depressed little bot. Denial can cause mental problems. But, you’te probably already too far gone.

  • Bringit

    Very impressive what Google/Android has done in a very short period of time.

    Looking forward to ordering my iPhone Wednesday.

    • Tim242

      When you realize it’s just a glorified feature phone, what are you going to swap it for?

  • http://twitter.com/Aleis joe

    Proof. the iphone is inferior to what android is.

    • Anonymous

      So one phone is inferior in total sales to an entire platform with over 100 devices?

      You sir, should start a company selling information under the obvious brand.

      Of course once you look at who is making all the money in this space you really find out how much that market stuff means.

      Which single company (not platform) doubled their sales YOY in that chart? And how many devices do the sell again?

      Thank you for plaing.

      $500 Billion in revenue come 2015. There is nothing any company, any platform or any industry can do to slow down their momentum.

      For the OHA members to earn the money that Apple earns with iOS the need to ship 6-1 on devices. Apple will most likely ship 30+ million IOS devices this quarter (20 million iPhones).

      That means that the OHA needs to ship 160 million devices this quarter just to stay equal with Apple on profit.

      iPhone 4 $199-$299 same as Android phones yet Apple earns a premium subsidy from carriers

      iPad $499-$829 no one can match on price and if/when 2 ships that doesn’t change.

      Microsofts ASP’s on a Windows machine? Around $100.00
      Apple’s ASP’s on a Mac? Around $1,200.00

      Market share is great but business is about making money. At least that is what they taught us in my educational studies.

      iPod no competitor so it doesn’t matter

      • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WiQmQhA-OrM Walter Sobchak

        I love watching you scramble.
        Oh and get some new material, you regurgitate the same crap after every android post, it’s getting boring.
        I don’t know how long it will take for you to understand this but, a company’s revenue or asp doesn’t make the phone more enjoyable to use.
        I know it’s crazy right, even though they have 500,000,000,000 dollars in revenue I just can’t convince myself the phone is not boring to use.
        Hey I’m sure you would use a tin can on a string for a smartphone as long as the company producing it had high enough revenue streams.

      • Anonymous

        So boring that you keep responding right?

        My point is not that the phone or platform or whatever is fun or not, good or not. None of that matters really. As silly as that seems it is true.

        My point is that same always. Apple is not and will not be affected by anything else anyone is doing. Their brand is too big and too strong. All they have to do is keep building products that just work and that people want to buy. Keep their marketing tight.

        Open new stores
        First time Apple customers buy new products
        They become iTunes Account Holders
        They buy more Apple products
        Rince and Repeat

        No other company, no other collection of companies (the OHA) has this going for them. Combined I am not sure they generated the money Apple does.

        There is only one company that can keep Apple from growth……..Apple.

        That is all I ever try to state. For the OHA to squash Apple they would need to…………actually there is nothing they can do.

      • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WiQmQhA-OrM Walter Sobchak

        First off I said how much I love watching you scramble. Then I said your same material over and over is getting boring, not fully there yet.
        And why, if you have this crazy business knowledge and infinite knowledge of apple’s business do you take time to respond to someone who says ” Proof. the iphone is inferior to what android is.” Like they will understand what you have to say anyway.

      • AndroidWins

        TheNewReign is just one of those whiny homosexual apple lovers. He must have broke a nail, hence why he is in such a bad mood today. I heard his dildo has a picture of steve jobs printed on it; pretty disturbing…

      • Iphoneis4gays

        Oh ya, I think him and Donny have slumber parties, where they take turns pretending to be steve jobs while they do each other.

      • Drew

        Not another flippin’ Econ class… Just stop it… stop with all the sales quotes and figures of how much Apple made YOY. And of all the frivolous numbers you just regurgitated (read: cut/paste from somewhere), you’re STILL not the #1 smartphone OS. God forbid you actually talk about the phone and not sales figures. What are those numbers doing for ya now??

  • Max

    Nokia has alot to catch up.

    • Booboolala2000

      Nokia will probably just skin Android. Hint, Hint Blackberry

  • http://twitter.com/oshizzle1991 Colby Rascol

    nokia is dead. they wont embrace android, and are stuck using their own OS, but it clearly is not getting them anywhere. it seems they have alot of thinking to do

    • Anonymous

      Their OS is outdated and sluggish. Too bad, I remember my old Nokia being an impenetrable fortress…

      But they were too full of themselves to admit the times were changing. I’m an Android user, but I have a lot of respect for companies like Microsoft who totally revamped their product to suit the times rather than ignorantly clinging to an old paradigm.

      • Anonymous

        What OS are you talking about? By your “outdated and sluggish” comment, you clearly haven’t owned a Symbian^3 device. A lot of posters are sounding like literal androids, spewing the same broken lies like they have been programmed to say that. It almost looks like a copy and paste post. To debunk your false information, the Symbian^3 is a new OS so it is not outdated. Symbian^1/S60 5th is outdated. Symbian^3′s UI is GPU accelerated and runs at 60FPS and there is even a modified .sis file that can run the UI at 85FPS.

        Post a video of YOU using a Symbian^3 phone with YOUR impressions of the OS…oh wait, chances are, you don’t have one or never used one and if the .1% chance that you did use one, you may have had so much bias before using it, that you didn’t even try to understand the OS.

        Bottom line, posters like you should be tired of lying. Your comments do not “help” the outcome of anything, they just make you look uneducated, misinformed and just another person that passes on a lie as if it is the truth.

      • Anonymous

        So, I guess that we’re operating under the premise that nobody who has an opinion outside of the bounds of your tiny world can possibly be telling the truth. But, let’s break down your arguments:

        First, running at 60 or even 85 FPS is not the only benchmark for the speed of an OS (and for the record, a very large majority of consumers would not be able to tell the difference between those two speeds even if it was written on the screen during a demo). There are many other benchmarks that are important, but you have to look beyond them and see how the phone actually functions. For instance, responsiveness to launching an application or opening a menu therein (which is where I found an unacceptable amount of lag at times).

        Second, I guess the .1% chance odds were on my side this time, since I have used a Symbian^3 device and was not impressed. Aside from the fact that the UI layout was awful, the handset build quality was cheap and uninspired. If the iPhone is a Lexus, this thing would have been a Kia Rio. And no, I wont be posting a video so you can jerk it to the sound of my voice.

        Third, even if I was lying or mistaken, don’t you think you’re being a tad hypocritical? You speak of “posters like [me]” as if we waste a person’s time with our unwarranted opinion. But, don’t you think that your post is just as full of opinionated garbage as any other “poster like [me]?” I will be the first to say that I’m well aware my opinions may be contrary to the experiences of others, but I hardly think that’s a cause for irrelevance. So, before you go calling people uneducated, (I have a bachelor’s degree in Business Administration btw) you should probably be able to distinguish “lying” from “opinion.”

        It’s okay though, you will catch on someday.

      • Anonymous

        Ok kyle4miller, in reply to your reply,

        To clarify the “educated” part of my comment. I was speaking about you being educated in the topic at hand, which is quote “Their OS is outdated and sluggish”. Your original post did not and your second post does not show that you are educated in Symbian^3. Your bachelors degree does not help you know Symbian^3 and is irrelevant to this discussion. You further “appear” to be uneducated in Symbian^3 by stating : “Aside from the fact that the UI layout was awful, the handset build quality was cheap and uninspired” I say uneducated because all Symbian users (past and present) know that the UI layout is FULLY customizable, not only can you add or delete homescreens, add or delete widgets, add or delete folders, add or delete icons, and shorcuts but you can rearrange every UI layout except for the text in system options (no OS lets you move text system options, but I may be uneducated in one that does). You can also theme the icons if you don’t like them or make your own theme/icons. For you to say that it was awful and not aknowledge that the UI is customizable shows that either you didn’t spend the time to customize the UI OR you were/are uneducated on the fact that you CAN customize it if you don’t like the layout.

        Also, you said that the build quality was cheap and unispired….Hmmmm..What Symbian^3 device did you use that has a cheap build quality? Unless you call adonized aluminum and Gorilla Glass cheap. Comments like that lead to readers like me thinking that you are some flaimbait troll. Clearly the devices are NOT cheaply made and even the most diehard Nokia haters can admit that. Somehow you got a cheaply made one. Was it made out of plastic? Did the endcaps with the torx screws offend you? No seriously, I would like to know which one is cheaply made so I can avoid it like the plague since I don’t like cheaply made phones.

        You said the design is unispired. That is fine, that’s an opinion, we all are entitled to one. I feel the same about some of Nokia’s unispired designs and Apples, HTCs, and all the others.

        You originally said the OS is sluggish and then you said opening application or menu is sluggish. Those are two seperate things. The OS moves at an advertised 60FPS. That is fact and anyone can clearly see that 60FPS (even not knowing the FPS) isn’t sluggish. Lets talk apps and menus:

        Applications open based on the level of optimization for each app or menu. That is seperate from the OS. If GAME A takes 10 seconds to open, that is no fault of the OS because GAME B opens in 2 seconds. The OS is NOT sluggish as you try to make it seem and once again, you disregard the fact that Symbian^3 DOES run at 60FPS via GPU accelration. Unless 60FPS is sluggish in your book. I came to you with facts disproving a sluggish OS, you came back with more opinionated backlash.

        I will clarify “posters like you”: The ones who come in and post opinions as if they were facts, post negative things to bring down a company’s mind share while praising another and coming off as a pure troll, with the jewel in the belly and colored hair and all. (you know, troll, the toy) Posters who have nothing to add to a discussion but opinionated words that can not be proven. Like your original post. Your second post is well written but that image of you was tainted by your first one. Guess what, that is my opinion of you and I cannot prove that and it doesn’t matter.

        What matters is when you or even I post opinions as facts. That is wrong.

        Fact: The OS is NOT sluggish and outdated by technical merit alone. And to make it sound like Nokia is left behing and is “ignorantly clinging to an old paradigm” is untrue. Symbnian^3 is NOT Symbian^1 and still has more features and is able to be customized more than the Microsoft OS that you have respect for.

        Opinion: Your opinion came off as pure Anti-Nokia trollism

        Thank you for the great read and comment. I am sorry you somehow got an outdated, sluggish, awful UI layout and cheaply made Symbian^3 device. I would like to know which device you used so I can make sure I don’t recommend it as well.

    • Anonymous

      If 2nd place is dead, does that mean Apple and RIM are already buried? And yes I now that their market share is slipping, but if all the top tier tech companies were winning all the time, then they’re be no competition and no changes in market share.

      Yes, currently Nokia is hurting, but your pronouncement of dead is short sighted at best.

  • JNM

    Definitely expected news and yet still impressive. I have an Android phone in my pocket right now and have no intention of moving to any other platform in the near future.

  • Booboolala2000

    This is definitely why the Iphone came to VZW. And despite what people think, I don’t think that VZW had to pay Apple shit tons of money. I think Apple was more than Happy.

    • Anonymous

      Of course they were happy. It means more business and it means more money. It is quite easy to tell who gave up more to bring the iPhone to verizon……. How many Verizon logo’s do you see on the iPhone 4 for Verizon? 0

      • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WiQmQhA-OrM Walter Sobchak

        How do you know El Jobso didn’t pay them some of that $500 billion you keep talking about to keep it clean?
        You d1ck ride apple so hard. You seem like an intelligent bloke, but you are so blinded, jaded, and biased that it’s hard to take anything from you teaching attempts.

      • douche

        lol i know right. that’s like saying xbox is better because they get the map packs and DLC before all others. duh, they pay millions to have it first, in this case second

  • Booboolala2000

    II still think that within a year, you will see an itunes app for Android.

    • Anonymous

      Why?

    • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WiQmQhA-OrM Walter Sobchak

      You mean on the phone or PC? Because there are already PC programs that sync and wirelessly sync your android phone with your iTunes library. You know, if you’re one of those people who think iTunes is the only way to put media on a handheld.

  • Anonymous

    it better be #1, being on so many devices, or atleast #2. if you purchase a phone that isn’t RIM or Apple, it probably runs android…

  • Whenemusattack

    Go Go Google Android!

  • Anonymous

    4.2% Market Share
    51% of all profits

    Good luck with that market share thing. Surely you stay in business with market share and not profits, right?

  • max

    RIM job losing share. Profits to fall next.

    • QNX Please

      Yea no doubt! Just dis-regard the fact sales increased 36% over last year….. Go back to Angry-Birds

    • serpentor

      Unlike Apple, RIM actually has subscriber numbers, and they grew that by 40% in their latest quarter.

      If you look at AT&T’s subscriber adds compared to the iPhones they’ve sold you’ll see that it’s the same people just buying a new iPhone every year.

      With RIM it’s the reverse. They keep signing up NEW subscribers who only buy the phone once because BBs haven’t changed in the last 20 years *hyperbole*

      • Erma Arguete

        hi there

  • http://twitter.com/gnomehole The Gnome

    We’re talking numbers… again… zzzzzzzzz.. Half interesting but even less important.

  • Marco

    Just BEAUTIFUL! GO GOOGLE GO!

    This is JUST the beginning! Apple is losing ground in the iPhone war and now iPad due to Google! Go GOOGLE Go!

    For all you Apple fanboys… even if Verizon sells 10 million iPhones in 2011… they will be taking sales from AT&T… in fact they would only add about 4 to 5 million sales in the year… Not enough to kill off the power of Android!

    33 million devices in Q4 for Google in 2 years is INSANE!

    That is why Apple decided to combine iPad, iPhone and iPod sales into iOS… because iPhone alone wouldn’t do it! And IPad and iPod are NOT phones… whether or not you can call via Skype or whatever software… A phone is a phone… and those are not phones…

    And oh ya… with Jobs on his last legs… Apple is in for a ride in 2012! :)

    • Michael Scrip

      “Apple is losing ground in the iPhone war and now iPad due to Google! Go GOOGLE Go!”

      Apple makes $600 on every iPhone sold… and they sold 16 million of them last quarter.

      Google makes $0 on each Android phone… but they do make fractions of a penny each time a person looks at an ad on their phone.

      They have different business models… and neither company will be going out of business because of each other anytime soon.

blog comments powered by Disqus