Verizon files appeal challenging net neutrality rules

Internet

Verizon Communications on Thursday announced that is has filed an appeal with the United States Court of Appeals in Washington, DC to challenge a net neutrality order put in place by the FCC late last year. The FCC’s “Open Internet” order puts a preliminary set of guidelines in place in an effort to protect consumers while not imposing too much control over ISPs. Apparently, the FCC’s first swing was a huge miss in Verizon’s eyes. ”We are deeply concerned by the FCC’s assertion of broad authority for sweeping new regulation of broadband networks and the Internet itself,” Verizon’s senior vice president and deputy general counsel Michael E. Glover said in a statement. ”We believe this assertion of authority goes well beyond any authority provided by Congress, and creates uncertainty for the communications industry, innovators, investors and consumers.” Hit the jump for Verizon’s press release.

Verizon Files Appeal in Federal Court Regarding FCC Net Neutrality Order

WASHINGTON – January 20, 2011 – Verizon Communications on Thursday (Jan. 20) filed an appeal in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, challenging the Federal Communications Commission’s Report and Order on rules dealing with the issue of net neutrality. The following statement should be attributed to Michael E. Glover, Verizon senior vice president and deputy general counsel:

“Verizon has long been committed to preserving an open Internet and meeting the needs of our customers.  We have worked extensively with all players in the Internet and communications space to shape policies that ensure an open Internet and encourage investment, innovation and collaboration with content providers and others to meet the needs of consumers.

“Today’s filing is the result of a careful review of the FCC’s order. We are deeply concerned by the FCC’s assertion of broad authority for sweeping new regulation of broadband networks and the Internet itself.  We believe this assertion of authority goes well beyond any authority provided by Congress, and creates uncertainty for the communications industry, innovators, investors and consumers.”

23 Comments
  • Eric

    The truth is that the FCC does not have authority to implement net neutrality and the courts had ruled that previously that the FCC did not have the authroity. Yet, the FCC under President Obama thinks they can just push through whatever they want.

    Welcome back to reality.

    • wake up

      I’d rather my internet be open then have to pick from a cable channel lineup of websites. I’m with the “President Obama FCC” on this. Blind ignorance.

    • http://twitter.com/redigits Steve

      It’s about time a major corporation challenged the unconstitutional authority and regulations imposed by Obama and the FCC. I sincerely hope Verizon is able to fight and win against the socialist regime and power grab!

      • Tn7871

        How’s the weather on your planet?

      • Anonymous

        Hey stevie… you sure you REALLY want VZW regulating the internet?? Paywalls and packet filtering???? Do you want your data rate slowed down so walmart can put up ads on their website? You are brainwashed by rush limbaugh.. use your own thoughts…

      • http://twitter.com/redigits Steve

        Spoken like a true Obama puppet.

      • Michaelsalvo4god

        It’s called letting the free market decide. If a company regulates their users’ internet access, go to a different company. They will lose customers and change their way of business.

      • QuickWeevil

        You should pick your battles buddy. You may have an argument on the “Constitutional Authority” of this move but there is no way Verizon’s way is good for consumers. You want your ISP tracking every move you make? Do you want “Channel Line-up” type website lists? That would be ridiculous and that’s the way we’re heading if Verizon and other ISP’s get their way.

      • http://twitter.com/redigits Steve

        I am not sure you understand the implications of the kind of net neutrality the FCC is trying to regulate. They want to socialize data traffic. It is their goal to make sure that every user pays the same amount for service, regardless of how much they use or the kind of data transmitted. I advocate the position that those who use more, should pay more, given that the infrastructure and resources required to accomodate users COSTS MONEY. So why shouldn’t Verizon be allowed to charge more to pay for their costs when their costs would not be as high if they did not have to accommodate the expensive users? NOTHING IS FREE and liberals tend to forget that.

      • Observer

        I’m going to go around all day saying “They want to socialize data traffic”. Bwahahaha!

      • m starman

        Patriot Act is much more dangerous to the country’s middle than guidelines on net neutrality. Where’s your outrage on that?

      • Anonymous

        What *really* is the difference between Big Business and Big Government? They both pursue their own interests with other players only having limited recourse to force them to do otherwise, and both of their interests are only moderately aligned with those of everyone else.

  • Anonymous

    Verizon’s greed is the only reality

    • Anonymous

      I’m agreeing with the first reply. It comes down to legality. They already do not have the power as illustrated by congress to have such power owe the communications industry. They are a regulatory body, that is their function. They can’t make laws. Nuff said.

      • http://twitter.com/bkcmart Chris Martinez

        As a regulatory body, they should be allowed to regulate. Is the FDA “making laws” when they regulate the food or drug industry?

  • Tn7871

    If they are so supportive of “open internet” then why are they suing? At least be honest. Just say you’re a money-hungry, evil corporation who wants to be able to charge Netflix/Hulu/etc extra money for the same services.

  • http://twitter.com/redigits Steve

    This made my day. Thank you, Verizon, for standing up to unconstitutional regulations, bloated government, over-regulation, Obama, and the FCC. TWO THUMBS UP!

  • What?

    Obama and the FCC?

    Huh?

    Can anyone specifically cite where Obama and the FCC collaborated on this? What does Obama have to do with anything?

  • Uneducated Tea Bagger

    This is outrageous! We need to fight against Obama and the Patriot Act he passed. It limits our freedom and privacy.

    • QuickWeevil

      Fucking priceless! You rock!

  • http://twitter.com/jrcrow79 EK

    Of course!..big red would challenge anyone who stands in their way of total “airwave” domination.

  • Acampola1

    Your a idiot think what you are saying. You want you isp to charge you more for useing the same websites ? Regardless of politics how does that make any since ?

  • http://twitter.com/Syk0Matik420 Beefy McBigDick

    verizon a.k.a. biggest whiniest b*tches in the wireless industry. constantly crying about something. when what they should be doing is focusing on not being so sucky and gay

blog comments powered by Disqus