Steve Jobs, in 2002, on the iPhone and the death of PDAs

mobile

Throwback Thursday was yesterday, but we thought it would be nice to spend a few minutes this Christmas Eve Day looking back on some of the events leading up to the introduction of the iPhone. The iPhone is, after all, a device that served as a catalyst in the mobile industry over the past few years — love it or hate it. It pushed the industry in new directions, causing competitors to approach hardware and user experience design in a whole new way. It even forced Google to rethink the BlackBerry-like OS it was developing, which resulted in the wildly successful Android platform we see today.

In August of 2002, nearly five years before the world would get its first glimpse of Apple’s smartphone, there were already rumblings that Apple was developing an “iPhone” behind closed doors. It would be a product that combined Apple’s industrial design prowess, the best of its software platform, several elements from popular Personal Digital Assistants like the Palm Pilot, and a cell phone. Of course nothing was confirmed at that point in time, but everyone was reading between the lines and coming up the same story. Firm rumors suggested that Apple tried to acquire Palm for $1 billion shortly after Jobs’ return to the company, and Jobs was becoming increasingly vocal about the impending death of PDA devices. ”We decided that between now and next year, the PDA is going to be subsumed by the telephone,” Jobs told The New York Times in an interview. ”We think the PDA is going away.”

The Apple CEO insisted that PDA devices of that era were too difficult to use, offering very little in the way of real utility. Jobs believed that combining a cell phone with the core functions of a PDA, however, would result in a truly useful device. Of course this was hardly a revelation — Microsoft’s Pocket PC platform was already powering smartphones at this point, and the Nokia’s Communicator devices were six years old. Jobs had a different vision, however, but of course he would admit nothing at that point in time.

It has been alleged on numerous occasions that Jobs takes his time with Apple products, and will force projects to change directions dramatically when something isn’t moving in what he believes to be the right direction. With that it mind, and being able to say in hindsight that platforms like Windows Mobile and Symbian were anything but intuitive, it’s easy to see why it took several years before Apple had a product Jobs was willing to take to market. But even in 2002, it was very evident that Jobs was envisioning a smartphone he believed would revolutionize the industry.

All Mr. Jobs would say on the matter was that the cellphone computers already on the market fall far short, and that some of the user-interface and industrial design touches already evident in the iPod would be perfect for an improved, consumer-friendly version of such a product.

The writing, as they say, was on the wall.

Read

image source: Blake Patterson

59 Comments
  • Anonymous

    What Iphone? My Palm m100 is the only device I will ever need! ;)

  • Anonymous

    Contrast this with Steve Ballmer, who still thinks the key ia for every device to run Windows.

    • RealDeal

      How is there a contrast? I am sure Jobs thinks everyone should run iOS or Mac OS.

  • http://twitter.com/hgcowner KlownGoblin

    ridiculous, an ipod touch is the same as a PDA, it contains your PIM stuff.

    the new PDA is now a smartphone (old designation was PDA Phone)

    • Anonymous

      If you believe an iPod Touch is the same as a PDA then you don’t know what a PDA is.

      • http://twitter.com/hgcowner KlownGoblin

        the ipod touch is more multi media oriented however its functionality is the same as a dell axim x50

        both have a touch screen interface
        both play music and video
        both play games
        both are wireless capable (wifi, with the axim haveing blutooth)
        both store your PIM stuff

  • RealDeal

    How is this even a story? Maybe if he had of said this years prior to other companies making smartphones this would be interesting. But he made these comments after Microsoft, Nokia and RIM were already making them and selling them. Stating that products that already exist today are going to be better in the future is hardly visionary.

    • Shanghai Dan

      You don’t understand. NOTHING exists prior to what Apple claims exists. It’s part of the Reality Distortion Field. Doesn’t matter about the real world – if Apple claims to have created a market, or innovated or invented some technology, then by sheer force oof word – they have done so. Prior art be damned!

    • Steve W

      He made those comments at a time when the pundits were asking when Apple would make a PDA, at a time when Palm was on top of the world. He said it five years before Apple introduced the iPhone; yet five years later the iPhone caught its competitors with their pants down.

      This is news because even today the pundits are so busy reading between the lines that they fail to pay real attention to what Steve actually says.

      • RealDeal

        LOL, thanks for reinforcing the Apple reality distortion field stereotype. In actual fact Apple had been trying and failing for 10 years to enter the PDA market. Don’t your remember the MessagePad?

      • Johnehw

        So what if they failed with the Newton? Edison took forever before his company could produce a practical incandescent light bulb blah blah you get the drift. I hate Apple but like it or not Apple learned from their mistakes and the iPhone was a huge hit for them.

    • http://twitter.com/DokHolidae Tronâ„¢ 2010©

      True but it took real vision and creativity to do with Apple did with the smartphone market. Just look at the uproar they caused in the industry with one phone, and just look at how mobile devices have changed since the introduction of the iPhone. None of the current mobile devices at that time came remotely close to what the iPhone was capable of. It literally was 5 years ahead of everything on the market.

      • http://www.facebook.com/people/Ricardo-Dawkins/746307628 Ricardo Dawkins

        N95 did (and still does) more than any iDevice.

      • Guest

        It does not matter if the N95 does more, hard facts says the iPhone was a bigger success then any of Nokia’s high end smart phones. If you wish, blame the market for that.

  • lurch

    Zach Epstein: “For the holidays, I’ll give the readers something they’ll really like — an article about Apple’s iPhone!”

    I’m so sick of biased, Apple-loving fanboy articles.

    I hope your gift to us readers came with a receipt.

    • Petey

      agreed.

    • aforty

      Haters gon’ hate.

      • lurch

        Lovers gonna love. I don’t even want none of the above.

      • dave chappelle

        i want to piss on you. yes i do.

      • lurch

        I wanna pee in yo food.

    • Azeron

      There is always BGR’s Triple Your Money Back Guarantee

    • Anonymous

      I’m sick of people that don’t even know why they don’t like the iPhone. Probably have never used one. Just hate it for no reason at all. One hundred million iOS devices sold owns all. Regardless of what you or anyone else thinks.

      • Drew

        Have you asked anyone?? Because I have TONS of reasons why I don’t… And yes, I’ve held one and used it and the experience is the same as watching someone else….there IS no experience really.

      • Whatareyou

        If you don’t like it then why are you wasting your time reading stuff about the iPhone? Your comments won’t change anyones mind or do anything to change the popularity of the iPhone. If you don’t like it then vote with your dollars get a competing smart phone instead.

      • http://claimid.com/155 155

        I don’t dislike the iPhone. I think it’s great. Competition is good. Android is definitely better, because of the iPhone. The iPhone is better because of Android.

        What bothers me is the way that Apple fanboys operate in a myth or as some call it a reality distortion field.

        The original iPhone had a lot of drawbacks. Fanboys claimed these drawbacks were actually features until the next version came out and suddenly all is forgotten. These drawbacks are now the greatest thing since sliced bread.

        For instance, remember how the original iPhone wasn’t 3g. iPhone fanboys used to tell me that was better, because their phone got better battery life.

        No third party apps? What do we need those for anyways?

        No multitasking. Pshhh. Who needs that anyways?

        Until they released the next phone that does it and suddenly wow it’s amazing. They’ve changed the world. Except two months ago it was a crappy useless feature.

      • Pollox

        Do you think ranting about the stupidity of Apple fanboys will do anything? It won’t, you are just wasting your time. Take a deep breath, walk away from this and buy yourself a nice Android smart phone.

    • Youarenutes

      If you hate Apple/iPhone/iAnything so much why are you reading and commending on a Apple article in the first place? What are you a masochist or something?

  • http://twitter.com/palfrei Peter Palfrei

    I wonder if the iPhone is the best all-around device in Apple history. Even people with PCs have iPhones.

    • FruitLoopSalad

      Why does everyone love iOS so much? Its messaging system is horrible and multitasking is still not 100%.. Aand the internet is gimped without flash.. I will never get it.

      To each his own I guess, who am I to say what’s good. I’m just a consumer like the rest.

      • Len

        Notifications are a joke too. That’s my big thing.. who wants a pop up interrupting them each time your friend texts you something completely irrelevant and pointless.

      • http://twitter.com/MikeAndersonWA Mike Anderson

        People love iOS so much because we think that the messaging system is better than the competitions, and the multitasking works as well as anybody really needs, and we haven’t even really noticed the lack of Flash on the devices (since a lot of websites are moving towards HTML5, and those with Flash aren’t even good on a smart phone anyway).

        Just saying :) But like you said, to each their own. I’m a huge fan of competition, as it keeps Apple from being lazy and not making their product better.

      • http://twitter.com/peterjohn Peter John

        Until HTML5 makes a real dent across the entire web, I’ll take the option to load flash any day.

      • Azeron

        Obviously, “everyone” does not like the iphone. It’s just that so many who would like to own one (such as myself) cannot own one on their existing carrier and some (like me) are unwilling to switch to AT&T to do so. So we pine for it and ask about it and generally make nuisances of ourselves. We are consumers, too. Consumers who are frustrated right now. Maybe once we get a chance at it the seething desire will calm to a slow boil.

      • Drew

        My guess is the “seething desire” after finally getting one will come down to a… “Meh, what’s all the hype about…”.

      • Loveyouhateyou

        So what if other people like it? Why do you need to care so much? Are they spending your money to buy boxes of iPhones? Its true that Apple fanboys need to lay off the Cool Aid but you also need to stop drinking your own brand of Hatetorade.

    • Mono_chet

      I LOVE my HP running on Windows 7 and my iPhone!

    • lurch

      Hmm. I thought about it, and no, it’s not.

  • Shanghai Dan

    So his “solution” was to release a phone that was a poor copy of the UI and functionality of HTC’s TouchFLO and SPB’s Mobile Shell…

    • Goofan (aka Apple Hater)

      I agree with you the iPhone is the worse piece of technology EVER! You can’t make calls on it, like ALL Android phones, you can’t run upwards of 500 applications simultaneously, like Android, you can talk, surf and work for upwards of 3 months with a single charge. Who needs this piece of crap. Like me Shanghai, you are a true Goofan (aka Apple Hater). We love HATING all Apple because they build products for the average consumer and that’s HORRIBLE for us people with superior intellect.

      • Shanghai Dan

        Oh, I’m not a Google fan – I’m a Windows Mobile User. You know, the OS that still is not equaled by iOS or Android, and the source (via HTC and SPB) for all the UI capabilities of both those other, derivative OSes.

      • Goofan (aka Apple Hater)

        you’ve GOT to be joking. Has to be. Heck WM7 isn’t even near to 6.5 and 6.x was a piece of shit! You must be sucking on Ballmer’s balls. Right?

      • Shanghai Dan

        OK, since you’re so smart:

        What can Android do that you cannot do with Windows Mobile 6.5? What UI improvements does Android have over WinMo 6.5 running SPB Mobile Shell?

        BTW, I have a Froyo tablet (HSG X5A upgraded from Eclair), and develop for both platforms…

      • MicroNix

        Shanghai,

        You’ve been trolled. Goofan was sent my SJ in an attempt to stereotype everyone who ones an Android phone as complete babbling idiots. His comments reflect someone who desperately needs a shrink and is a true waste of internet bandwidth. He secretly owns an iPhone though he’s mad he can’t figure out how to use it.

      • http://twitter.com/DokHolidae Tronâ„¢ 2010©

        In reply to one of your later statements I’d like to say just because its possible to do something on a platform doesn’t mean its recommended or even comfortable to do it. Sure you can multitask on WM6 but than you have constant crashes, freezes and you have to tinker with a task manager to preserve the already terrible battery life. Sure you can install apps on WM6 but good look finding apps as easily as you can on Android or iOS or even WM7. Sure you can go install all kinds of unofficial roms with a WM6 device but why can’t it just work as good as Android, iOS, or WM7 out the box without flashing the phone? Sure you can browse the web on WM6 but the browser is not a webkit html browser and it just sucks really, might as well use a BB OS 5 device for internet. All in all WM6 is just a pain to use, its not very intuitive and there’s not a very big app market for it so expandability of the platform is sorely limited. WM6.5 sucked and thats why MS trashed it

  • Tech_User

    i never knew that PDAs actually ever took off

  • Anonymous

    in 2002, i wanted the Sony Clie soooo bad.. times have changed

  • Anonymous

    I love that he somehow managed to give credit for the success of Android to Apple. Classic.

    • Anonymous

      Yeah, next they will be crediting Microsoft’s success with Operating Systems to Apple. What is the world coming too.

      /Sarcasm because you need to be told.

    • http://www.bgr.com Zach Epstein

      Good point. Suggesting that the Android team’s BlackBerry OS-looking mess was even remotely influenced by the launch and subsequent success of the iPhone is ludicrous.

      http://j.mp/hfHVl8

    • Anonymous

      Yep, he stands right behind Al Gore for inventing the Internet.

  • http://claimid.com/155 155

    Come on,

    This is like an Apple PR post. It doesn’t even mention the best-in-class Treo and ignores the wild shortcomings of the original iPhone (it was a web browsing phone that played music).

    The only innovation of the iPhone was putting a full browser into the phone that supported almost all the web standards and was quick. They copied everything else from someone else.

  • Kappy79

    Merry Christmas… Shitters full. So we emptied it here with this crap story.

  • The Real Steverino

    It’s Christmas. Why won’t the rest of you drink my Kool Aid?

  • Rick00770

    the iphone was a quickly boring device, what a useless article, a fashion piece one tires of especially when you see what else is out there, sheesh

  • Roby

    Link to the old NY Times article, please!

  • http://profiles.yahoo.com/u/4M2C53IE5W6K3QKBTN2TCL2BTQ David

    The writing, as they say, was on the wall.

    Indeed. That was the year of the first real Blackberry.

  • Anonymous

    People would have had more interest in pda phones if they didn’t cost $500 for a 2g device with a two year contract. More little would have shown interest, which would have led to more intuitive ui designs. Sadly though the manufacturers only considered these devices for corporate types. steve jobs should get credit for making them something that consumers would want. But it was also the price of these devices and the carrier subsidies that helped

  • Bob

    What is an iphone?

  • http://www.facebook.com/nathanb131 Nathan Burbridge

    Phone/PDA device merging? 2002? This makes me think of the Palm Treo, introduced several years ahead of the iphone. I had tried several pda’s that didn’t do too much for me. Then when I got my Treo650 (2005 I think?) everything changed. Suddenly I had that always-with-me device that contained all my contacts, notes, calendar, could look up info on the web and had a huge library of 3rd party apps. I could multi-task, copy and paste, listen to my music/audiobooks. True convergence. I’ll never understand why Palm pissed away the market that THEY pioneered. All Apple did was make it popular to the average, non-techie, feature-phone customer. Kudos to Steve Jobs for that. Average iphone user’s thought process: ‘ooh shiny, wow it does ipod stuff, look I can surf the net in my hand, haha ifart, yay angrybirds, lets see what’s happening on fb’….. years later ‘you mean I can use this to be a more organized and productive person instead of just be constantly entertained?’ Me: facepalm. I appreciate that my smartphone apps are now much cheaper simply due to the huge increase of customers that were herded over with the allure of fun games and slicker graphics. That’s pretty much all I appreciate apple for right now.

blog comments powered by Disqus