MacBook Air benchmarks: stock vs. built-to-order

Hardware

Ever since Apple announced the new MacBook Air — and we found out there was a built-to-order option which upped not only the RAM but CPU — we figured it would be worth putting it head to head with the stock model to see performance differences. We have a 13-inch MacBook Air “stock” model with a 1.86GHz Intel Core 2 Duo processor, 2GB of RAM and a 128GB SSD drive. Our built to order MacBook Air is rocking a 2.13GHz Intel Core 2 Duo processor, 4GB of RAM, and a 256GB SSD drive. Hit the jump to check out our results.

For our benchmarking tests, we used Geekbench and Cinebench. Here are the results:

According to Geekbench, the built to order MacBook Air came in with a score of 3314, and the stock MacBook Air came in at 2976. That’s around an 11% difference in performance.

When we ran Cinebech on the built-to-order MacBook Air, we got a score of 1.19. On the stock MacBook Air we got 1.04. A performance difference of around 14%. Is the extra price worth the extra performance?

Well, you’ll have to spend 27% more than the base stock-model to get the faster CPU and additional RAM — part of the reason being you get a SSD that’s twice the capacity — but still, that seems a tad expensive. We will update this post with real world usage feedback over the next couple days to see if we’re missing something, but for now, if you don’t need the additional storage space, we’d say just upgrade the RAM and you’ll most likely be a happy camper.

18 Comments
  • Anonymous

    Yeah, but how does it compare to say, a 13″ Macbook Pro of i5 15″ Macbook Pro? Would like to see the comparison to those.

  • Anonymous

    Now compare the stock Lenovo ThinkPad X201 to one that is upgraded, since you guys seem to be in to benchmarking now.

    Oh, only Mac stuff? Pfft.

  • Octotron

    Not sure why BGR seems to only care about over priced Apple netbooks lately…Perhaps do a real review on a new XPS like a built to order XPS 15?

    • Octotron

      Not to mention 4 of the articles on the front page are about Apple. you are aware there are other companies with products out there too, yes?

      • Anonymous

        Apple brings more hits, thus more ad revenue

        Or better put

        My apple brings all the boys to the yard and damn right it’s better than your’s

      • Octotron

        Better than my what? TI-83? I have never owned/used/seen/been forced to troubleshoot an Apple product that was as magical as everyone wants to make it out to be. This coming from someone who owns an iPad and works on Macs every day.

        I would just like a little less Apple coverage on the blog and a little more coverage on things that are markedly better for a lesser price.

      • wanderer

        people here complain about apple articles, and you are right, it brings more hits including the haters who always takes the time to say how much they don’t like reading apple article. Here is an easy answer: Don’t click the freakin hyperlink and take time to read it and then trash apple. I only click and read articles I’m interested in. If enough people do this, there wouldn’t be so much apple postings….but they play right into the trap. Negative comments are still publicity for Apple.

    • Anonymous

      No kidding. Paying slightly more puts you in the range of the Sony Z of vastly better specs.

  • Anonymous

    Obvious article is obvious:

    TLDR: When you go from 2 to 4gb of ram on any computer this produces more noticeable performance benefits than bumping up processor speed 10%. If faced with this choice between these upgrades at similar prices, choose the ram.

  • Johnsonroda27

    No one cares holy crap.. everyday its MAC after MAC after MAC.. wow dude.. wow the old one is slower than the new one.. crazy stuff right there..im mindblown.. NO ONE CARES

  • JagoX

    Wait wait wait…you mean a computer with a more powerful CPU and more RAM is *FASTER* then then same model with a slower CPU and less RAM? SHOCKING!

    …and you’re basically just benchmarking standard components that are found in pretty much any laptop (Mac or PC) so why is this a story again? Plus like with everything else, they’re just benchmarks…they don’t really mean anything in the real world.

  • Anonymous

    Good post, even though the other people comment and deride this post highlighting the total useless-ness of this review, i love it and trust me it helps a lot of people who are seriously looking to buy a mba and who are confused at whether they shud go for a stock 13″ mba or a customized one and if the price upgrade is worth it.

    Again, great work, EXACTLY what i was looking for, one of a kind article on the net! keep it up! love bgr

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Kelby-Chen/1025869262 Kelby Chen

    You’ll pay 27% more for 11% better performance, now it’s up to you to decide if it’s worth it. Apple won’t tell you that, so BGR does. Why so serious and negative?

  • http://rmbo47.myopenid.com/ rmbo47

    That’s my plan: upgrade to 4GB RAM and leave the processor alone. 13″ MBA, here I come!!

  • Lee

    ~~ Well, Guys….Apple Products IE: iPhone and Mac Air, and Mac Pro, Gets Front page, and more coverage/press … BECAUSE THEY ARE THE BEST DAM PRODUCTS EVER BUILT …AND BY FAR …DUH …

    ENOUGH SAID …

    • JagoX

      Spoken like a true Apple fanbot ;)

  • Decombobulatordan

    Engadget already did that comparison.

  • http://www.facebook.com/brettmlewis Brett Lewis

    Wow! my 3 year old refurbished macbook pro has a faster processor then you “upgraded” air.

blog comments powered by Disqus