Mini Review: EarSonics SM3 in-ear headphones, high-end buds for the audiophile in you

Audio

Let’s just go ahead and just throw this out there: EarSonics’ SM3 in-ear headphones are not a “stocking stuffer” item. Furthermore, they are — in all likelihood — not going to interest the majority of you. So what are they? They are $379.00 worth of skull-thumping, head-bobbing, eardrum-titillating, in-ear bliss. If you’re an audiophile, and take sound very seriously, you should definitely take a look at the SM3s.

Designed by French audio firm EarSonics — a company that specifically caters to musicians, sound engineers, and audiophiles — the SM3s are a serious piece of technology. Built with three drivers — 1 low, 1 mid, and 1 high, all with three-way passive crossover — the buds can respond to frequencies between 20Hz and 18kHz. The SM3s also have a sensitivity rating of 122dB/mW (if that doesn’t get your head bobbing, nothing will).

In all seriousness, the sound emanating from the SM3s is so crisp it is hard to explain. They make our new Bose in-ear headphones feel like they were purchased at Family Dollar. We could only crank the volume on our computer and iPod up to about 75% before the sound got so loud, and so clear, we couldn’t stand it.

The cords running from the 3.5mm jack to the buds of the SM3s are twisted, making the cord extremely hard to tangle and get into knots — even if you manage to get a snag, a quick pull on one end will usually take care of it. The 3.5mm jack is “L” shaped which we like; we find that headphones that have a vertical 3.5mm jack, like the stock iPod earbuds, often bend when put in a pocket or bag (eventually leading to wire breaks). Our two criticisms of the SM3s were:

  • Jamming three drivers into in-ear buds requires space, for that reason there is a little extra hardware that is hanging out of your ear. In our opinion, for the sound quality you get, it’s well worth it, but you will have to get used to it.
  • At times, we wish the “low” driver was pumping out just a tad more bass; you really notice it when listening to hip hop but don’t miss it when listening to classical music.

The buds come with a carrying case and four sets of foam/rubber buds to make sure you get the fit you want. Hit the read link to read more.

Read

30 Comments
  • Mr.Bill

    One step closer to being assimilated… Or is it being an ass, I get confused.

  • Mgl323

    As much as I like in-ear headphones, I still prefer over-the-ear headphones. You know, the big ones.

    • ColnagoC50Fan

      As a Grado RS2i and SR60 owner, I completely am down with a set of cans.

      Give the ITE bud lovers their due, there’s some pretty good buds out there. The SM3 buds are just OK, but IMO the Grado GR8 buds sound better than the SM3 buds at about one-third of the price (and my SR60 cans) – made in NY too. Grado’s SR10 buds will be out in a week with better response on the high and low end over the SR8, I’ll be adding the new Grado buds to my collection – BGR, review the SR10 buds, they’re just hitting the street and don’t make you look like Frankenstein. Just sayin’.

  • Ripper

    i just ordered mine from Sound Earphones like a week ago. I love them.. They have a 15% off coupon going on right now too. “OCT”

  • Kellte2

    No user-replaceable cable, no deal.

  • Jonathan

    How do these compare to the Shure SE425 monitors?

  • MacMan

    I’ll stick with my beats by dre.

    • Mike

      You could’ve bought Sennheiser, Grado, or Audio Technica cans for the same price and got MUCH better sound.

    • DroidCLH

      Most people would rather hear their music than a simple BAMBAMBAMBAM for three and a half minutes

    • Mitch

      @ MacMan

      Those “Beats” headphones, both in ear and cans are terrible.

      Congrats, you would rather listen to music with a shit product than something quality.

  • davesmall

    –>> At times, we wish the “low” driver was pumping out just a tad more bass; you really notice it when listening to hip hop

    Whoa!! You paid $379 to listen to Hip Hop. Psychological counseling is in order.

    • ChimChim

      Counseling is in order for anyone who would spend more than a dollar to listen to the crap spewing from an MP3 player. $350 lends new meaning to the phrase “lipstick on a pig”.

      • DroidCLH

        You mean they weren’t using a headphone amp?

  • JMD,..in Northern VA

    Hmm, at that price,…they should help drive the car!

    JMD

  • suburban_war

    OK, so who stole the logo?

    Check out sleek audio’s logo, then this logo, then safeauto insurance… they’re all pretty much the same thing.

    That said, this is a competing product to the offerings from sleek audio, so if these guys copied the logo, prepare for lawsuit!

    • nick

      safe auto and earsonics were around before sleek-audio so i would say sleek-audio copied the image from safe auto and earsonics.

  • George

    Could they have made them any uglier?

  • Apple Fanboy

    Can anyone recommend a good pair of in ear buds that don’t get stuck in your ear lobes upon sweating. I had a pair that I needed to pull out of my ears with tweezers when I wore them in the gym from sweating. What a disaster that was.

  • Tdot34

    $380 for headphones! wtf if it was made by Apple I could pays this, but not EarSoinc. I

    • DroidCLH

      “$380 for headphones! wtf if it was made by Apple I could pays this”

      This would be the definition of a tool.
      Also, you do realize that the actual music playback for a vast majority of all apple’s music devices is totally pathetic. I need a headphone amp on my touch to even fool myself into believing that im actually hearing the song

  • Joe Jones

    I owned these phones, sold them. To me, they were anything BUT crisp. In fact, they are much to warm mushy, plus owners have reported QC issues with them, so durability is a risk. Some do love them, but plenty of others don’t. Save your money, they are not worth the cash.

  • watbetch

    Equating loudness with sound quality, this review is right up there with the best of them.

  • KBrightman

    I’ll stick with my Westone UM2 pair. As an industrial designer, I know… MY EAR IS NOT SQAURE or even hexangonal. Form-follows function, but when your career counts on it… turn to a professional musician. http://www.westone.com or http://www.shure.com is what they will say.

  • Impheatus

    I don’t know about the earphones but what’s with the reflection in the picture?!?!?

  • Art

    So these are better than the trusty $20 JVC Marshmallows that I have been using and enjoying with my Sony Walkman for like the last 3 years??? Thanks but for $380, no thanks.

    • Mitch

      You are kidding, right?

      Go try some lower end Shures, they will completely burn your junk JVC phones.

  • Martin

    Do they have a remote?

  • JaggedXJ

    Can’t believe no one has mentioned the Klipsch Custom 3 in this discussion. A well respected brand with a top of the line 3-way design like these. All less than $200 on amazon last I checked.Hard to understand why they haven’t been reviewed here.

  • http://www.getdrunker.com kertong

    uhhhh, yeah.. i’m going to have to go ahead and recommend the ortofon e-q7 or the fisher audio dba-02s for a far superior performance/price ratio. if price isn’t an object, and you like bass, go for the sennheiser ie8s – they’re the only IEMs I’ve heard that opens up the soundstage enough to sound like good headphones. i’ve yet to hear the gr8/gr10 grado offerings like a poster mentioned, but as a fan of grado (and an owner of the sr225is.. amazing cans), I have high hopes.

  • Mitch

    Is BoyGenius really surprised that the Bose in-ears were crap?

    I laugh whenever I hear someone say they are serious about music and own Bose products. New Bose products really are crap.

blog comments powered by Disqus