Microsoft kills the KIN, refuses to sell it in Europe

Breaking

KIN

Apparently Microsoft has come to the realization that, much like the hipsters it was targeting with the device, no one wants to be caught dead with a KIN. Microsoft has confirmed that the two devices are toast. Here is what their PR people said.

We have made the decision to focus exclusively on Windows Phone 7 and we will not ship KIN in Europe this fall as planned. Additionally, we are integrating our KIN team with the Windows Phone 7 team, incorporating valuable ideas and technologies from KIN into future Windows Phone releases. We will continue to work with Verizon in the U.S. to sell current KIN phones.”

Good riddance, we say.

92 Comments
  • winston smith

    thank fucking Christ!!!

    Posted from BGR Mobile (iPhone).

  • Frank

    R.I.P. P.O.S.

  • Verizon Employee

    When they showed these at work prior to release I thought it was the biggest error we made since passing on iPhone. From the crappy user interface to the $30 for data. I hated it from the start.
    Several weeks later we received formal training on it and I began to see a market for it. I still felt like the lack of smart features and presence of the smart data plan still would not work. The correct market for a device like this was 12 – 18 year olds who live and breathe social networking, but lack disposable income.
    In a seperate training class recently we went to the web to read reviews on the Kin, there were 33 for Kin, and 39 for Kin II. I think 500 sold is an inflated number.
    Horrible concept, cheap product, ridiculous data plan, half-witted marketing.

  • bob

    It’s not that they they refuse to sell it
    It’s that customers refuse to buy it
    OBVIOUSLY
    Because it’s crap

  • TeamSidekick

    This phone was supposed to replace the sidekick?! Yea right. Even after they tried to scare everyone away by crashing their servers and database for a whole month. They’re better off making a new sidekick.

  • TeamSidekick

    This phone was supposed to replace the sidekick?! Yea right. Even after they tried to scare everyone away by crashing their servers and database for a whole month. They’re better off making a new sidekick. That would sell to the thousands of remaining die hards out there. I for myself sold my Sidekick LX 09 and joined #teamblackberry

  • MikeB

    I have to agree, Verizon is more at fault with the Kins failing. Wrong data plan, $30 for their target market is too high, teenagers don’t work or have a job to pay for it, and adults think twice about paying $30 data plan for any smartphone. They should have done $10 data plan like Tmobile does with the Nokia Nuron.

  • Sprinter

    The smaller one looks like the Pre’s fat sister.

    • tarhiny

      Fat, UGLY, sister.

  • jordan

    Glad they finally realized the kin is a terrible idea

  • http://theosyslack.com Theo Syslack

    Hate away, but as a social-network-driven Teen, I’ve like the idea of the KIN. In application, it probably sucks (the interface looks clunky as hell) but a cheap monthly rate for good to great social networking is what I’m looking for. It looks like the iPad’s the closest to that description.

  • New York User

    I don’t see how Windows Phone 7 can succeed either(even if they make it open source, which they won’t).

  • http://johnvasko.com John

    What a joke this phone was from the beginning.

  • BOB1xxx

    really what was M$ thinking it wasn’t better than any feature phone, like the env touch? It was a brain f&rt at best. Bye bye.

  • vzwemp

    When the Kin was released I thought it was slow, and couldn’t even compare to a voyager or dare or env. It has social networking plastered all over the os it doesn’t even make sense on how to use it. So far from user friendly, who wants to wait for a phone to do what it advertises, and to pay 30$ a month when you can get any number of phones that are faster and have the same features where you have a choice as to whther social networking is scattered all over it or not, this phone was destined to fail.

    Its not verizons fault this thing has to be connected to a data network 24/7, but I guess its not microsofts fault that verizon doesn’t allow it to be on their 9.99 data for regular phones. Either way, the phone is too slow and too annoying to use. If you want to make a phone like that at least give it a chance to compete by adding a user friendly interface and some hardware to back it up. Android phones are going to take over soon anyway. They will make cheaper phones that do social networking and no one is going to want anything else since verizon requires a data plan for almost any phone now.

  • Jonathan

    So what now? How many units did MS produce that’s now going to grace landfills en masse? What a waste of money, resource, commodities, talent, rare-earth minerals, etc. This has got to be a window (pun intended, I guess) into how their upcoming flagship mobile OS will sell.

    • http://vzw.com nwmldavis

      Ummm…I’m no software engineer, but couldn’t they just wipe the devices operating system and replace it with the first version of Android? Then it might have a snowflakes chance in hell of selling.

      But I can predict the future…buy a good phone get up to four Kins FREE! VZW will be forced to allow it on the $9.99 data to get rid of these things. If they don’t go with my first suggestion.

  • Brad

    No surprise here. Nobody wants it. It’s a lame phone. With its limitations, it’s basically nothing more than a glorified feature phone, but Verizon is trying to charge close to smartphone plan pricing for it. And the OS itself is just pathetic. One look is all I needed to figure that out. I’d sure like to know who was in their focus groups, because Microsoft is seriously out of touch with reality on this one. Makes you wonder how good Windows Phone 7 is actually going to be.

  • MonkeyCheese

    Didn’t they do any research on the demographic they were trying to sell to?
    “Hey guys my daughter said this phone is cool so it’ll sell like crazy!”
    NO, your daughter is a lying teenage bitch. You should have gotten a test group and seen how the phone did in the test group. Morons!

  • T

    Call me a pessimist.. but I’d be surprised if even 1 of these things were actually sold.

  • justin

    alot of money wasted on this phone – they were advertising the crap out of it for weeks – did no one really test this phone in the wild to see how it would be received? plus they released the kin phone a little over a month before the iphone 4 was announced – not good timing! besides the promotions only mentioned social networking features… did anybody else know what the actual features were other than social networking? also the kin would have done better if it was on the anticipated windows 7 op but instead they used windows ce

  • Mike

    For all of Microsoft’s arguments for ‘innovation’, it seems anytime they try to make something different, it fails. If the business world wasn’t inundated with Windows and Office, this would be a failing company if they were trying to break into the market. Only by taking a “me too” approach and slapping the Microsoft name on it are they selling products just by brand recognition and regurgitation of existing product lines.

    • Joshie

      I think MSFT has largely lost the ability to innovate. They have been essentially resting on their laurels for so long now that it’s all they’re good at.

      • Kronyk

        MSFT never had the ability to innovate. Everything they’ve ever done has been ripped from somewhere/someone else including the original DOS OS that gave them their start. Look it up.

  • http://alghienkad06.student.ipb.ac.id thea

    bad……

1 2 3
blog comments powered by Disqus