Windows Phone 7 Marketplace regulations, features detailed

Software

windows-phone-7

Ars Technica has an interesting write-up on the rules and regulations developers will have to follow in order to publish to the Windows Phone 7 Marketplace. For the most part, Microsoft’s terms seem pretty standard – especially when compared to other mobile application ecosystems such as Android’s Market or Apple’s App Store — however, there are a few exceptions. For starters, a developer account will be priced at $99, which is slightly more than Android’s $0 price point but right on par with Apple’s iPhone Developer account. The $99 includes an unlimited number of paid application submissions and 5 free-applications submissions per year; additional free-app submissions will cost $19.99. This should, as Ars put it, “discourage mass submissions of junk applications.” Moving on, WP7 Store will allow applications to have time-limited, fully-featured trials — thank you Microsoft! Ars goes on to point out that: “Many of the free programs on Apple’s store are just cut-down versions of other, paid applications; with Marketplace’s built-in support of trials [...] these free programs might not be necessary.” Right on. Finally, the store’s terms of service indicate that apps that, “generally fall under the category of pornography” (as well as several other categories), will not be allowed. So there you have it. Any Windows Mobile developers out there excited about the WP7 setup?

Read [Ars Technica] Read [Microsoft WP7 Developer Terms (PDF)]

23 Comments
  • Norm

    Looks good. Hopefully it won’t end up like the clusterf#ck that is the Android Market.

    • FML

      What we need is a marketplace where it’s free to post free apps but there is a way to “vote down” free apps that are spam, ads, etc… If an app gets voted down too much it gets kicked from the marketplace. If a developer makes too many of these shitty apps they get banned and need to pay the initial $99 again.

  • doublejizzle

    What is the issue with the Android market. It seems easy to use to me.

  • The Big JC

    This is a change from the first market setup. The first market setup called for the developpers to pay x dollars for y number of submissions I think. I’m in agreement with microsoft about this. snapple boasts their 200k+ apps, but most of them are downright useless. I suppose if the masses want useless apps, sell them. However, it wastes my time having to wade through so many useless apps.

  • bobbee

    can not stand the UI of this phone. weird margins, icons you can see from space and when you get into the 2nd level where the name of whatever you are looking at stretches across three screens is horrible. is this what the final build looks like?

    • Norm

      I agree. This UI is terrible. They should have just copied off of Apple like Android did.

      • bobbee

        i’m all for them trying something new but do i really need a quarter of an inch margin with an arrow to tell me that i can swipe the screen to access more information. unless the touchscreen is so bad that they had to make the buttons and margins huge that way you didn’t click on something you didn’t want. i mean come on.

    • T

      agreed, so much wasted screen space. all that info could be displyed in a fourth of the screen and still be just as finger friendly. all that scrolling to get basic info that should be displayed on one screen will probably be very annoying!

  • drew dogg

    I hope that’s not what the real phones will look like…. b/c if it is they will continue to be the worse selling OS on planet.

    • justme

      actually the OS outsells everything but BB in the corporate setting which is what this OS is designed for

  • SupAll

    That phone aside, I think Microsoft’s terms are pretty reasonable. Although I have a Droid, I hate seeing all of these “Free Version” apps that often have highly limited capabilities and goad you into buying something that doesn’t have any greater functionality (or so it seems). So, seeing the “time-limited, fully featured trial” was probably the best and most refreshing part. I feel that WinP7 will end up with more quality apps, but a smaller market whereas Android will have larger market, but fewer quality apps (ratio wise, at least.)

  • TONY

    Phone and UI looks like shit. Scrap it MS. Your dead.

    • C. Bess

      Well said. iPhone and Android for the future.

  • MiniMe

    Waiting anxiously for it to arrive. The first truly innovative UI since the first Palm Pilot, which was then copied by Apple and Google.

    • C. Bess

      Haha, you’re mostly high and shallow. Google UI is innovative and unique along with Apple’s. Don’t forget UI goes hand-and-hand with UX.

  • Darnell

    A developer would have to pay $99 just to give their app away for free.

    This is why I don’t like the “Marketplace/app store” concept and prefer how currently there are lots of sites out there with WM software. Plenty of nice freeware sites too.

    We should be able to decide for ourselves what is “junk”.

    If MS fostered more freeware along with the paid apps, they’d flourish faster.

    And although I really enjoy my HD2 and WM 6.5, WM 7 still has not won me over.

    • SOUTHERN MISS ELITE

      You’re missing a huge concept Darnell.

      Developers most of the time make their products ‘free’ only because they know they can throw on ADS!

      What I read from the blog post was that developers are now being discouraged from making apps that are ‘free’ but ad supported or just purely uneeded. They’ll only have 5 slots for free things a year.

      I think the REAL reason for this is not to crack down on the junk apps, but to limit google’s newly adquired admob! Many developers make the ‘free’ version of a product just to install ad mob and make money that way. And then they wait for people to complain that they want an ad free version so they then make a premium version with basically the exact same features and no ad mob.

      This is Microsoft basically curtailing complaints before they even start. Users like you and I can now try an application at full strength and then decide if its worth purchasing or not. Developers then get the 99 cents or whatever and we don’t have to worry about using a restricted free version full of ads

  • http://www.chriswashington.net Chris

    I’m excited.

  • Really people?

    I love how this people rip on a phone’s UI that doesn’t even exist outside the confines of Microsoft and people they choose to test it out. Even if a phone has the “minimum” requirements for windows phone 7, it outshines the majority of the competition. I cant wait to see what a phone has packed in it that goes above and beyond the minimum requirements.

    I really enjoy the Zune music interface, i find it easy to use. It is a heck of a lot better organized then the itunes store. And the only thing the Zune player is missing is games, but I think it will get more now apps/games now that windows phone 7 is coming out.

    I think this OS and any HTC phone made with it, will sell very well.

    • bobbee

      i am ripping on the aesthetics of the UI, not what the phone can or can not do. i don’t care if this thing turned into a hoverboard it still almost makes me have a seizure every time i see it.

      • bob

        i agree ! million percent

    • Scyberian

      @ Really people?: Obviously, I can’t say what the Zune interface for WP7 will finally look like, but my old 30GB Zune 1.0 has games on it, so we might see that used as a general “media” file for games and pictures, as well as music.

  • bob

    unbelievably… incredibly… UGLY

blog comments powered by Disqus