Google ditches Windows in favor of OS X and Linux

Security

new-google-logo

Citing a renewed focus on security thanks in part to a recent series of cyber attacks originating in China, The Financial Times is reporting that Google is abandoning support for Microsoft’s Windows. Citing several anonymous employees of the search giant, the FT said that as recent as January, new Google employees were permitted to run Windows on their laptops, but the use of the OS on desktops was strictly forbidden. The continued use of a Windows machine is said to require authorization from high ups, and any employee that requests a Windows rig will need approval from the CIO. At the moment, authorized OSes are said to include Linux and Apple’s OS X. But for all of the talk of security concerns, the FT’s sources allege that the move also has as much to do with Google’s desires to ween its employees off of competing products as it prepares to launch its Chrome OS. Not surprisingly, Google declined to comment on the matter.

Read

51 Comments
  • http://(null) sikkboy

    Should have done this a while ago.

    Posted from BGR Mobile (iPhone) at: (null) Atlantic Ocean

  • http://www.igadgz.cz.cc @AntMcl

    Agreed, it should have been done long ago. Also, Google should hurry up and release this damn Chrome OS.

  • jazzyl

    Does this mean that Windows is not safe?

    Sent via BlackBerry.

    • tom

      That’s not entirely true. OS X has its own share of problem as well.

      Since majority of the population uses Windows, Chinese hackers train themselves to specializes in Windows and finding flaws, thereby one flaw can infiltrate and access to more PCs.

      • nefan65

        Actually, that’s only partially true. Based on the way Windows is written/coded, it’s also easier to exploit. That’s a fact…look it up…on…GOOGLE! LOL

  • Jacken

    Well isn’t this saying something…

    • Gauntlet Down

      Says a whole lot to OTHER Corporate America that, perhaps, they avoided due to politics. Now that it is “out in the open” that there ARE viable alternatives to Microsoft software maybe other companies will adopt those alternatives.

      Competition is good.

  • Apocalypse

    I’m using switching to Google alternatives.

    Google is truly evil and people are sheep.

  • Jayhshmay

    Any alternative to Microsoft is a good thing!!!

  • http://(null) caediackid3302

    Isn’t their Chrome OS supposed to be a web OS? How could that possibly be safer than an installed OS, Windows or otherwise? Just wondering.

    Posted from BGR Mobile (iPhone).

    • http://www.mkoby.com Michael Koby

      Apparently you didn’t watch the announcement for Chrome OS.

      1) Chrome OS is linux based (specifically Debian/Ubuntu), so it’s already more secure than WIndows

      2) Chrome OS will have a hash-key security that will check against Google’s servers on every boot up to ensure that what is running is what came from Google. If it’s not then it will blow the box away and reinstall with Google approved versions. Since most stuff on the box will be stored in the cloud, once a reinstall is finished all your stuff will be there.

      3) There will be very limited local storage so the issue of something infecting the system is minuscule.

  • Sam

    Windows 7 is the most secure OS that M$ has put out in recent memory. It is fast, it is stable and almost makes up for the Vista release. That being said, viruses and malware are typically written to exploit the most in use desktop environments and applications. Mac users and Linux users still have to worry about viruses and malware, but all along they have been built differently (more intelligently with safety and security in mind from the ground up) versus anything offered by M$.

    More mainstream adoption of Linux is a good thing. It’s a fast, stable and secure OS. In 40 seconds I’ve got my desktop loaded up and my browser running already. 98% of my hardware is recognized and the only programs I can’t use are M$ exclusives like Office or Adobe Photoshop. Later in the year Steam will be available to Linux users officially. With Linux, I know that I can give my kids permission to use my computer and know that they can’t fuck it up.

    • nefan65

      WRONG! Sorry, but there are very few, if any known viruses for Linux and/or OSX in the wild. Same is true for Malware. One of the biggest reasons WIndows is more vulnerable is how the system was built. Windows 7 is better than XP/Vista, but it’s still very prone to get viruses, and it has nothing to do with the volume of Windows 7 systems.

      I do agree that more Linux/OSX/UNIX is better for all, and competition is good. Let’s hope it continues…

    • NuShrike

      Windows is still a single-vendor niche-tech. This means their technology (and security) does not come from a community of developers specializing in it (as well as peer-reviewing the tech and fixes), but internally.

      Of course MS has some of the best programmers out there, but it’s ruled by marketing, not engineering.

  • http://rossmanngroup.com Louis Rossmann

    I don’t see how google should have to comment on the OS they choose to put on their employee’s computers.

    • MSF

      They are making a statement!

      Don’t use microsoft products!

      Forget Exchange & Hotmail for the cloud, use Google Apps!
      Forget Windows, use Chrome!
      Forget Windows 7, use Android!

  • UberSapian

    If Macs ran 1/3rd of the software that I use , were not all-in-1 integrated units , were upgradeable and I could purchase/build one for less than an average pay check… I would like one… Guess I’ll never have one. :(

  • http://cnet drake

    i can see why they did windows can be good but also have many problems but i do have so window on my phone and computer too And it works for me

  • T

    Awful choice… 10.6 is like Vista… only worse.

    • nefan65

      I’ve been running 10.6 with not issues at all. Stable, fast, I can access Exchange via Mail…same with iCal.

      Just checked up my uptime states….48 days, and counting. Performance is solid. I’d check a couple things:

      1. Hardware
      2. Software
      3. Mirror [TROLL]

      • T

        If you are, then good for you. But I’d also check the mirror [FANBOY]. And then go use the website of which the article is regarding to search the multitude of issues and witness first hand that this very-active Mac user and non-troll shares the same issues that an overwhelming majority of Snow Leopard users do… and then take note of how they’ve even gone to calling it Apple’s Vista.

        But congratulations on being able to email with your computer. That seems like a difficult task to accomplish. I’d wager Windows ME users could do the same things as you without issues too. Doesn’t change the fact that it is a terrible OS.

      • nefan65

        Email? Ya, I email, surf the web, manager 300 users, 30+ Servers, VoIp…all that…with a Macbook, running OSX [10.6]. No issues at all.

        Terrible for you I’m sure. Again, probably because you really don’t use it. You just spew garbage, and troll the sites. No problem….troll away…watch your head on the bridge…

      • T

        That’s kinda funny… because “IT” is a blanket term, like saying you got a degree in “business” or you majored in “liberal arts”… it means nothing at all. On top of this, distribution and server farmers are like… 2 entirely different positions, specialties and knowledge bases… you must be a regular Bill Gates. Next thing we know, you’ll be a certified DBA too, because you work in IT.

      • ernielm

        Hey T, stop being a Microsoft FANBOY and an Apple hater. Pretty darn soon you may become an endangered species! I am sorry to say. But I am sure you will NEVER admit that. It’s too painful!

      • T

        Really? I use Macs, I think I’ve made that abundently clear…….. it’s tools like you that are questionable.

  • Perspective

    Yes, “T.” 10.6 is like Vista, minus the usability problems, dreadful performance, driver issues, the registry and the need to release a giant 10.6.1 service pack 2 years later (at full price of course).

    • T

      Yeah… except 10.6 has all those things you just mentioned. Dreadful performance, driver issues, usability sucks, fans run constantly at the highest RPM, the system runs hotte, it’s slow, that OpenCL garbage doesn’t do a damn thing to improve performance yet still takes CPU cycles, videos don’t play smoothly anymore, WiFi is unstable, after a few days of uptime the v-sync fails and if you move windows they experience tearing effects, apps crash constantly, firefox and safari both run buggy, typing is slow to react, Adobe Premier and other Adobe products hardly work anymore, expose is worse than useless. The spinning rainbow/beachball is constantly there, doing god knows what. Snow Leopard turned a once nearly perfect Leopard Mac Pro into a totally useless mash up of aluminum, plastic and copper. So I can awesomely start up and shut down soooo much faster, but doing anything of value takes so much more time you’ve lost the benefits of both just trying to start your first app.

      Instead of acting like an Apple fanboy… maybe try using it. Because it doesn’t work for shit. Having to actually use the thing on a daily basis for work, I couldn’t have been happier than the day I was given a Windows 7 laptop as a standby machine, which has now become my go-to for my actual WORK to get done. But you can go enjoy your fast start ups and 8 gigs of extra space that will take you 4-5x longer to fill than it would have before.

      • nefan65

        I use my 2 1/2 Macbook daily. I’m an IT Manager, and I support well over 30 Servers, 300 desktops, etc. and use a Macbook to do so. He may be an Applefanboy, but you sound like a troll.

        But you go ahead and enjoy your transparent menus, and Windows 7, Viruses, Malware, and Registry Hell. I actually need to do work, so I’ll continue to use my very reliable Macbook….

      • T

        I sound like a troll? You sound like you are him with a different username, and have grandiose dreams of a huge future in IT, which are often the people that work for companies that know the absolute least about computers.

        You may be correct on viruses, but when exactly was the last virus on a Windows machine? 1996? Viruses spread machine to machine, hence the problems… Malware, spyware, bloatware… they infect every OS alike if you’re “smart” enough to visit websites that perpetuate their existance. Anyone that doesn’t use “common-sense” internet browsing is susceptible to malware and spyware. iBotNet, mac-specific malware. It’s very existance defeats your entire thesis and exposes you as a fraud on both counts of calling yourself an IT Manager and an expert on malicious software.

      • nefan65

        I have no such dreams…been in IT for over 25 years.
        1996? Wow…guess you haven’t been reading much…LOL. WOW…

        Again, I have yet to see any virus on a Mac/Linux box. Care to shed any light? Oh, you can’t, because there are none….

        Back to you bridge troll…

      • T

        Who said virus? Do you mean me stating, “You may be correct on viruses”? Because that’s not been an issue in ages. Malware and spyware. It’s all about malware and spyware. Neither of which require root access that viruses do, thus, have an effect on every OS. Hence, the iBotNet malware program in existance, and the over 1000 viruses, malware and spyware items that infect Linux as a whole.

        Sorry, but even if you are in IT, it doesn’t make you an expert on this. It just means you get paid to do something a monkey can be trained to do… install programs and walk new towers to employees on a dorky luggage cart.

      • Dara

        You’ve been in IT for 25 years and don’t understand that “Trolling” on the internet has nothing to do with ugly creatures under bridges?

        Are you accusing him of asking you riddles before letting you pass?

        Or are you accusing him of laying down a baited line and dragging it along to see who will bite, i.e. what fishermen do when they’re trolling?

      • T

        Now don’t go confusing him with those accurate explanations… I think he’s talking Three Billy Goats Gruff, except he doesn’t realize he’s the troll, and I’m the eldest goat.

      • nefan65

        He’s an old goat all right…LOL

        Talking about bait, sounds like he’s taken mine hook, line, and sinker. I suspect the bait smells better too…

      • T

        Really though? So you’re admitting to being a troll, and a fraud. Very well, move along now, troll.

      • nefan65

        Sure thing old goat…

        Hey! Stop eating that trash!

  • Jason Porter

    Come on, folks… this is NOT NEWS. Google has been rolling out linux on the desktop for years. More than a year ago, the numbers they put forward indicated that more than 50% of their employee base (~10,000 of 20,000 users) were already using their in-house variant of Ubuntu, called Goobuntu. See the wiki: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goobuntu

    I don’t really understand why people are focusing on OSX from these reports, either. Some users will certainly use OSX if they prefer it, especially if they are in creative roles, but the real meat of this announcement is that Google is confident enough in their (already-large!) linux deployment that they’re expanding it across their whole enterprise. That’s huge news for the Linux community, not necessarily a feather in OSX’s cap.

  • Roger A

    Ummm……what?

    I dont get it. Is Google dictating what people are allowed to use? Or is it for programming?

    • Terry

      They aren’t really dictating, it’s a business, they get to decide what is installed on the machines. Now your personal computers are your choice.

      Some of it is probably for programming as well.

    • NuShrike

      Same as most companies dictating Windows is the OS of choice for their business, or IE for the stupid ActiveX.

    • gw0n

      Just the same as SteveO not letting any Apple employees run around with Android phones. Most companies do this to some degree.

  • Chut Pata

    So, the Google-China fight turned out to be a WWE style fixed fight. China is secretly helping Google in bringing Microsoft down. Chinese government has already standardized Linux instead of Windows because Linux is free. However since the majority of the world uses Windows, the developers focus more on Windows, keeping it popular. All Google need is a temporary surge for Chrome OS. Just enough to get the attention of developers. Then MS will start going down, Chrome will start getting popular, and China will get a dream free OS.

    Juicy conspiracy theory, what do you say? Well as the Village Zen Master (of Charlie Wilson’s War) would say, “We shall see”.

  • MikeD

    Ironic eh.

  • patrick

    This underscores Google’s affinity for cloud computing. With the cloud you can open any document and run many programs, all with any OS. Call it fragmentation but it works. And hopefully it shows the fanboys that Google is good.

  • jawman

    they’re using xp, and it’s really all about getting employees off of anything that isn’t chrome.

    • jawman

      Also I’d be willing to bet that Windows is the most used OS at Google, so they’re starting with the most popular and most widely used operating system, and will eventually trickle down to the rest of the OS’s and clear them out to make way for Chrome.

  • DaJe’ J. BarbouR

    google is going to come out with their own operating system just watch.

  • celz

    If Apple is so secure why does the iPhone have more security exploits than any other smartphone os? Common sense would say the same reason Win has more viruses and malware…

  • anonymous

    There is NOTHING wrong with Microsoft Windows, plenty of large companies use it just fine and don’t have any problems. Maybe Google should invest in some better Systems Engineers and Windows Administrators to assist in security issues.

  • chris

    Where’s the bgr app for android

  • Anonymous

    Um… Pwn2Own people. I would never trust anything to a Mac. It is the least secure OS out there.

    http://TechReview.LIEconomy.com

    I think the Windows thing was a knee-jerk reaction to an employee with an unpatched machine.

blog comments powered by Disqus