Oxford University gets quiet as students are banned from using Spotify

General

There’s nothing like ruining your ears by blasting your favorite tunes while studying up on photochemistry and reaction dynamics, but Oxford students will have to find somewhere else to go deaf. The prestigious university offers free Internet access for its students, but Spotify, the wildly popular music streaming service, has been grinding the network to a halt. That pretty much makes life more difficult for the students accessing the network to, you know, learn stuff. But some of the students who use Spotify daily calls it “discrimination,” with one student saying, “I use it loads. It’s the most comprehensive collection of classical music in one place.” To the students’ dismay, the university retorts, “The university provides free internet access for students because it’s an educational resource. If they want to use it recreationally as well that’s no problem unless it uses so much bandwidth that it slows the network down.”

We don’t feel too bad for the Oxford students. Call it schadenfreude since we don’t get that music streaming service in the U.S. yet.

Read

15 Comments
  • NoFan

    I’m pretty sure the internet is NOT FREE. As most universities the cost is somewhere in the tuition, so the students should be able to do whatever they want. That’s just my opinion.

    • unknown

      the cost is offset by tuition- especially when its wifi.
      If any student checks their tuition letter it should be clearly labelled as “computer access” or “network upgrade fee”

      personally i dont use spotify… anyone heard of grooveshark? keeps me happy

  • Laz

    This sounds like an opportunity for the local cable/phone company to offer free wifi for promo purposes…

  • StretchingForStories

    This just in: News today wasn’t only just slow, its at a grinding halt.

  • JM

    With the tuition paid to that school there is not a single justification for them not to provide enough of a network for their students uses…whatever they may be.

    • Mikee

      So the tuition paid by one student to hog the internet means more than the tuition paid by another student that can’t use the internet because of the above mentioned internet hog?

      Your logic.. it sucks.

  • SUGAR GROVE

    doubt that streaming music is overwhelming the bandwith. perhaps they are adding data stream to the mix for some unknown reason. this is high academia and would expect to have a few miscreants testing their skills

  • Dara

    Reality check:

    128kbps music stream * 20,000 students at oxford * 10% using spotify at any given time =

    256 mbps of constant data.

    256 mbps / 8 bits per byte * 60 seconds/min * 60 min/hour = 2 GB /minute

    That kind of internet is not free and quite frankly, schools have better things to spend money on.

    Also, wifi is realistically going to provide 5 mbps service at an arbitrary spot on campus. If you have 20 people streaming music in the vicinity, there’s going to be serious lag.

    • Jon

      Any large school is not like your house or datacenter. They participate in large R&E networks which are fast for the sake of being fast.

      Consider the 25,000 person campus I went to. 10 GigE off campus. Dorms were provisioned with about 450 mbits alone, not counting the rest of the school and research use.

      Most school traffic doesn’t hit a ISP and is virtually free. Look up TransitRail or Internet2 Commercial Peering. Those that do are handled thru the R&E, where they sign contracts for 10s of gigabits at once.

  • Jamie P.

    I love the fact that you used “schadenfreude” in a sentence. Hope B.G. gives you a nice pay raise =D

  • Yandar

    Aah, poor little lambs can’t get ONE service in the US. There are thousands of apps and services that are US only or are severely degraded when used outside the US.

    Google Vioce, US only.
    Zune, US only.
    Lots of phone apps, US only

    You get the idea..

  • http://cartoonvixens.blogspot.com Aaron Martin-Colby

    I’d speak out against this if I didn’t still have memories of the internet in my college days. Napster was all the rage and, during the day, the college connection was literally USELESS.

    If a web page simply didn’t time out, it would take ten minutes to load. Really bad.

    But, even with that in mind, that was ten years ago with a program that purposely maxed the network. Students want music, and a 128-256kbps is a hell of a lot better than other alternatives like YouTube.

    The University better have a more far-reaching plan than just banning Spotify, otherwise they’re going to be having bandwidth problems again in the near future.

  • Christian Millar

    Don’t even consider whining about not getting Spotify. To my knowledge, there are NO streaming services in Canada, and NO plans to make them work.

  • http://www.therealtimsmith.com Tim Smith

    I’ve never understood why schools are still having trouble with bandwidth happy website. Packet shaping people. It’s been around for a decade and works great. We ran a Packeteer solution at our University and it worked like a charm. You can identify problem users, problem sites, problem applications, and turn them off or shape the traffic down to reasonable levels. We used it to give HTTP priority, but carve up a chunk of our bandwidth for flash video so YouTube wouldn’t cripple our 100MB for 1000 people. Without it things just wouldn’t work.

  • Ayle

    There is only one thing people are forgetting. University internet is not a free service and you also have to accept an agreement when you connect saying that if you are adversely affecting other users they are free to cut you off. It is also pretty easy to bog down wireless APs as those are most likely running on 802.11G which as a severely limited bandwitdth. The problem there is not the bandwidth between the university and the wed but on the university actual network.

blog comments powered by Disqus