EU drops antitrust suit against Microsoft

News

EU Flag Over Countries

The EU, and various other stakeholders, *cough* Mozilla and Opera *cough*, filed suit against Microsoft in 2007, alleging that the act of only having Internet Explorer installed on the Windows operating system by default was an anti-competitive business move that violated EU antitrust laws. The suit proved effective, as European regulators and Microsoft executives have reached an agreement on how to move forward without the “help” of the courts. Microsoft has consented to a five year contract that requires all copies of Windows in the EU to present the end-user with a “Choice-Screen” that presents an option of 12-browsers to have install. Internet Explorer, Safari, Chrome, Firefox, Opera, AOL, and Flock all made the short list along with a few lesser known browsers. Microsoft, which has already paid around $1.7 billion in EU fines due to the IE debacle, will face additional penalties if they decide not to honor the five year deal. Microsoft estimates that 100 million current Windows users will be presented with the pop-up while another 30 million will see it as a result of new hardware or software purchases. The “Choice Screen” will be presented to users running Windows 7, Vista, or XP, and will begin showing up next year.

Read

32 Comments
  • Soddy

    Can someone clear this up for me because I really don’t know the answer as I’ve never done it and know that I don’t want to start a flame war. Does OS X give you the same choice that Windows does about browsers when you install it?

    • http://www.bgr.com Andrew Munchbach

      No, you are correct, Safari is the only browser installed on OS X by default. It will be interesting to see if the EU sees Apple’s market share as relevant enough to launch a similar suit, or if this was just a shot directly at/for Microsoft.

      • Mrwirez

        No, it was directly aimed at Microsoft. You see, Microsoft is a giant American “animal”… The richest man on earth owns it. Europeans believe wealth should be distributed amongst everyone.. This is their slice of American (Redmond) pie. Microsoft already paid $Billions in fines for shipping a “complete” OS experience. This goes back fifteen years… BS

    • T

      Nope… Safari only. And this is all because Microsoft had the audacity to include a very functional web browser for free in Windows 95… I guess these antitrust judges in the EU decided they preferred the method prior, where you bought Internet-In-A-Box and Netscape for hundreds of dollars. Sorry, I gotta take Microsoft’s side on this one. Removing the cost barrier of entry before even signing up for expensive dial-up services in those days, is one of the reasons the internet took off as quickly as it did.

    • Soddy

      Thanks a lot guys, that’s what I thought was the cause. Definitely agree with all of you, total b.s. lawsuit. I feel that if you’re intelligent enough to log on to a computer you should be intelligent enough to go out and download a different web browser.

      • Soddy

        Case* not cause.

  • Branden

    Thank god, IE sucks

    • Chris

      Until you need to access specific webapps especially education sites, government sites, or some banking sites, and you end up being SOL b/c you don’t have IE installed. I can’t tell you how many ppl I’ve seen have issues running things like Tegrity at my medical school b/c they didn’t realize they needed IE installed.

  • Cnote221

    interesting… obviously not knowing the details of the suit I dont get this lawsuit 100%. 1 part of me kinda gets it but then for the most part I’m thinking “well its microsoft’s os, why shouldn’t they include there own browser by default?” Its not like a person cant go and install there own browser of choice… This may be an off the wall comparison but that would be like Ford being forced to offer Sparco or Recaro seats to the customers for there own cars. I guess its trying t make the distinction and seperation between OS & Browser to make it more fair to compete?… weired way to go about it.

  • tom

    A-O-Freakin-L???? I feel bad for the uneducated older folks who associate that pile of crap with the good old 56k days when Slingo was popular.

  • http://www.amwmedia.com Andrew Worcester

    I think it’s a sad state of affairs. I hate IE as much as the next person, but what kind of president does this set!? I mean, could google sue for the right to have a “choice screen” put in between picasa and windows image viewer? What about windows media player? Does anyone else see something very wrong with forcing a company to advertise competitors products?!

    • http://www.amwmedia.com Andrew Worcester

      *precedent*

      • http://www.bgr.com Andrew Munchbach

        Actually the EU vs. Windows Media Player has already been decided on believe it or not….

        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Union_Microsoft_competition_case

      • http://www.amwmedia.com Andrew Worcester

        That’s just sad. Soon they’ll force MS to put a “choice screen” between Linux and Windows at the very beginning of the OS install process! What are people thinking!?

  • StevenGlansburg

    this just highlights the insanity of socialistic european thought

    • Tom

      Cant agree more

    • jerbear

      This has nothing to do with “socialism”. You need to lay off the Glenn Beck and learn what that even means before throwing it around all the time. We’re gonna need a new Godwin’s Law for people who cry socialism whenever they don’t like something.

      This is plain old companies lobbying the government to gain a greater foothold. The same goes on in capitalist paradises like the good old US of A as well.

  • Eric

    We live in a sue happy world. Very sad…

  • yandar

    So long as Apple has to do the same, I’m fine with it. With 12 choices, you just know there are going to be loads of people clicking on some obscure browser and getting malwared to death as its so rubbish.

  • Unsung Hero

    This is a bunch of stupid hateration! Why should have to offer a competitors product on your operating system? If you don’t like IE you can download an alternative in a few minutes! Stupid stupid stupid! It happens on almost every OS and Mobile OS except WM haha they offer Opera and IE! Lame as Anti-trust! Go after the real culprits! Goooooogle you are going down!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • B B (No, not Blackberry)

    Atlas Shrugged is coming true.

  • because I said so

    Arent’t the people in Europe smart enough to use IE to go download the browser they want?

  • Mrwirez

    F*ck those Euro bastards… They cost American shareholders big bucks because of their liberal-socialist bullshit. Microsoft spends $ BILLIONS on designing these operating systems and half of Europe probably steals it anyway. A browser must come with an OS and I don’t see the problem with them shipping their own browser, after all, they designed the product. No one is holding a gun to anyone’s head to use IE.. I use Firefox but, IE is still needed for some sites and applications. What Microsoft should have done was ship the “e” version WITHOUT ANY BROWSER and let the stupid litigious motherfuckers have to go find a way to install one on their own. Go buy a pen drive full of browsers… They would be begging for IE..

    I am NO Microsoft sympathizer however, Europe is totally free to design their own OS free of any Microsoft products..They can use Linux, or even Apple. Doesn’t Apple ship with an equally shitty browser called Safari?

    Btw, anyone can go into the control panel and turn off IE, Media Player, and a whole bunch of default MS items. Fuck the European crybabies.. I hate sue happy weaklings..

    • jerbear

      Did you forget your meds again? This is businesses using the courts and government to gain a competitive advantage just like they do in the US. Yes it is bullshit but spare me the fascist ranting. As usual the legal system has no clue about tech issues and the competing companies are taking advantage but it’s hardly some “socialist” attempt of the people to take over the methods of production via the government (which is what socialism is).

      • Mrwirez

        @jerbear..

        Why do they not go after Apple? I know why, Microsoft has 93%+ global penetration. It is not worth the Euro’s to push Apple around. …No wonder we have bat-shit crazy conservatives in America. Predatory litigation and distribution of wealth is ANTI-capitalism.

        I beg MS to ship Win_7 “e” without any browser…

    • http://kvirtanen.deviantart.com Kimmo

      ( from my experience in web developement, being a WebKit-based browser, Safari is actually really good :)

  • ORDUSA

    Microsoft should say, “You don’t wanna play nice? I’m taking my ball and going home.”
    What? Your government can’t access anything? There’s anarchy in the streets because people can’t get on the internet all over Europe? You need help installing a browser for Windows? That’ll be A BIZILLION dollars for Tech support for a product that is not on the Original Install disk. Thank You from Microsoft.
    Microsoft still wins. I know they lost a lot of money because of the suit, but compare the price of Windows here in the US and the prices I saw when I was in Europe this spring, and my eyes almost popped!

    FCK those asshats that don’t know shit!

    I agree with you Mrwirez 100%

  • http://kvirtanen.deviantart.com Kimmo

    Maybe now the ~10% amount of computer users who still use IE6 will start to diminish :)

  • http://reviewerps.blogspot.com Brian Ward

    For years I trumpeted Microsoft and supported them, but I think this came about because they used their position to strong-arm hardware vendors to NOT include other browsers. In that way they were using their near monopoly to smother competition which is a no no. I think the EU’s persistence is sort of an affirmative action for web browsers at this point.

  • Indy

    This item is seriously inaccurate. The EU didn’t “drop” the suit; Microsoft settled it on EU’s terms. This means the EU won. The fines Microsoft previously paid the EU had nothing to do with IE; they had to do with WMP and server software violations. THE USA Justice Dept previously sued MS on IE, not the EU. EU law was violated because MS was found to have abused its dominant position. Commenters should read the 300 page EU decision before mouthing off about irrelevancies such as socialism.

    • True American

      Oh look, commie lover Indy is here. Leeching welfare off the working folks sure beats getting a job for yourself, doesn’t it Indy? F the EU!

  • Z

    I’m going to sue Microsoft for breaking antitrust laws. They only include their own medi player, file manager, desktop environment and control panel in Windows 7. Clearly this is in violation with European antitrust law.

blog comments powered by Disqus