Pandora resolves royalty dispute; policy changes coming

General

First and foremost, Internet radio lovers have some serious cause for celebration as Pandora announces a somewhat workable resolution to the ongoing royalty dispute that nearly drove the company into the ground. By somewhat workable, we mean it’ll keep them in business but it’s still paying the highest royalty rate in radio. What does this mean for Pandora users? Well it means they can keep using Pandora of course, and 90 percent of users will experience no changes whatsoever. For the other 10 percent though — users who don’t pay for Pandora One but stream more than 40 hours of music per month — the free ride is over to an extent. Any non-subscriber who goes over 40 hours in a month will have to cough up $0.99 in order to continue streaming during that month. $0.99, as in less than a dollar… We’d say that’s pretty fair. In all seriousness though, if you’re listening to 480+ hours of Pandora per year and not supporting the company by forking over $36 for a year of Pandora One, well, you should definitely consider it. So congratulations to Pandora on ending a 2-year fiasco. It might not have been the best possible outcome but hey, if it keeps the company afloat it’s not all bad.

Read

20 Comments
  • WHAT

    Lame….

  • Roger A

    Slacker Radio has a better UI, better music selection, better music controls, and on most phones enables BlueTooth audio…

    Sorry Pandora, you are 2nd class to Slacker, and 1st to pay the most! YAY!

  • stormhater

    I agree, I got the email this morning telling me the same thing… then again 36 duckets is not too bad…

  • ~Phel

    roger, Pandora has updated to include bluetooth audio. Who has the better music selection is debatable because I personally prefer the songs I get from pandora. If Slacker is your thing that’s cool, there’s enough for everyone. If Pandora is the 1st to pay the most it’s because they generate more $$ than Slacker. I guess that somewhat makes them #1, ya know profitablility and all…

  • Bdizzah

    I find pandora better bc the amount on underground non-mainstream music they have on it. I mean, secret chiefs 3… what other radio (streaming or otherwise) has stuff like that on it. Very glad to hear pandora is here to stay!

  • Scott

    It looks like I’ll be forking over that $1 every month. Between work and the gym, I can stream more then 40 hours in a week on my iPhone. lol

    Posted from BGR Mobile (iPhone) at: Tempe United States

  • CoryB

    I love Pandora i think i can afford $.99 if i go over the 40Hrs

  • Ari

    I think by spending 480 hours a year on it you ar supporting due to all the ads on the page. It’s built to be ad supported. If you use ad blocker plus then maybe not so much. Anyway i can live with .99 a month.

  • tavella

    If I could pay the $36/yr and have the ability to skip more than six songs an hour like on Slacker with a paid subscription, I’d be all over Pandora. I love it on my VuDu box and phones (Bold/iPhone). Slacker got me with the cached music feature on my Bold. Implement these types of changes and I’ll subscribe.

  • http://(null) alen

    Asked pandora about caching via their Twitter account and they said no plans for it.

    Posted from BGR Mobile (iPhone) at: New York United States

  • Dave

    Or…use another email account if you go over 40 hours a month. Pretty simple….

  • Dave

    Nothing for nothing, but I dig the underground too and Slacker has ‘em…

    http://www.slacker.com/?sid=stations/1127670/1247089

  • jorge

    Slacker here I come…back.

  • Beeve

    These are all going away if the RIAA has any say. They’ve got pull in the Obama administration. just look at the ludacris pay-out awarded from a small time pirater. The RIAA is going to suck every cent out of listeners and their providers until they crush these “free” music radios. There needs to be a shift.

  • alen

    uh, the organization that negotiated this with Pandora is affiliated with the RIAA and record companies. the record companies have a few industry groups to do different things and RIAA is just one of them.

    there is an artist group called ASCAP or something like that and all they do is sue small business owners for playing the radio and not paying royalties to them

  • http://blog.weaverling.org/ weave

    @Dave: Yeah, it’s easily gotten around. Why bother? I purchased Pandora One last month (soon as they told me how I could subscribe via Amex since it’s my only credit card) and I think it’s worth it.

  • Roger A

    Phel- I think the only reason Pandora generates more then Slacker is…

    1. Pandora is not free on all platforms, some are charged for the download app.

    2. Pandora is on almost every phone platform, where as Slacker seems to prefer iPhone and BlackBerry and their own proprietary system

    While I prefer the ability to pick songs, and music in the Slacker interface, I do use Pandora sometimes, and I might give them a try again, if they start offering their app to be more user friendly in terms of usability.

  • Michael

    This is like public radio. If you want me to give you money, take the ads off. I am not going to pay money, while you also make money from ads.

    Public radio says: “we are listener supported”, and “thank you for supporting public radio”, and then they say, “Support comes to you today from the law firm of ‘Wee, FleeceEm and Howe’”. Is that an ad? Uh, Yah!

  • ~Phel

    Roger…I also have to concede that the cacheing of music is pretty cool on slacker…I’ve worked with pandora support a few times and they stated that because of their liscening agreements that is why they won’t cache music…

  • Jeff M

    How come Pandora doesn’t play Anita Baker songs?

blog comments powered by Disqus