Palm Pre Review: Part 1

Review

We know, we know. You wanted the review sooner. Well, you know what? It’s here now and we’ve busted through this handset like a Japanese tourist with an SLR in Times Square. So how does the Pre stack up against the competition? Can it contend with the top-of-line smartphones that are currently on the market? Will it end world hunger and bring Isaac Hayes back? Read on for the world’s first hands on review of the Palm Pre!

UPDATE: While we believe the OS the Palm Pre is running is the final retail OS, there’s still some stuff missing from it. Additionally, the hardware unit itself is 100% a retail unit, yet we weren’t able to test things like phone calling for obvious reasons (uh, you call this a review and you can’t test the damn phone?). We planned all along to actually do a more thorough review with a retail unit at release, just like we’re doing with the BlackBerry Tour 9630. But in the interest of being transparent, we figured we’d update this post and let you guys know that another entire review will be coming. Thanks!

Palm’s Mission:

Before we jump into the really, really good parts, we thought it was important to recap the “magic” that Palm has done its best to create. Announced at CES 2009, the Pre was instantly a media smash. At least in the tech world. Journalists, bloggers, consumers, prosumers, even corporate users all wet their pants with excitement in anticipation of the Palm Pre. In the midst of a recession that had slowed most of the tech world down to a crawl, the Pre was a shining beacon of light that represented the most exciting new mobile phone since the iPhone. The problem is, that was six months ago and the average person can’t pay attention to something for longer than 52 seconds. Dedicated Pre blogs and a small breed of new fanboys are still on fire of course, but that is hardly a sure sign of commercial success. The question is, has Palm been successful in creating hype with the average consumer? Here we are roughly 8 days away from the launch date and its looking like even if the answer to that question is yes, Palm and Sprint won’t have enough inventory to make the launch a success.

Screen:

The screen is where the Palm Pre shines. Selections take little to no effort and there’s that oh-so-magical water ripple effect when actually touching the display. It’s vibrant, rich and all around really clear. Like we said in our Pre-view (har, har), we’d rate it just behind the iPhone’s glass capacitive touch screen — it’s that close to being perfection. The size difference between the two is really noticeable however, with the Pre having a 3.1 inch display, but as you’ll read on later, this makes the device much more pocketable. Just know that as high as your hopes are for the Pre right now, the vibrant display is one area where you will most definitely not be let down.

Keyboard:

It’s really not good. My hands aren’t that big (I can type faster than you could ever dream on a BlackBerry, iPhone or E71) and my thumb literally takes up 3 or 4 keys on the keyboard. There’s less space in between each key than say, a BlackBerry Curve 8300 keyboard, and the texture takes some time to get used to. It’s a rubberized coating kind of like the Centro and Treo Pro, and while the keys are a bit harder (better), the coating could possibly get irritating as usage increases. It’s really such an important area that couldn’t afford to be messed with and we’ll admit it… we’re a little let down. You’re going after the big guns here, and this is kind of disappointing.

You can’t compete with RIM in the keyboard area and you can’t compete with Apple in the soft-keyboard area, so how are people going to enjoy using your product when the data entry isn’t perfection? It’s like buying a brand new Ferrari, but getting an Accord steering wheel. It’s not the end of the world, but it isn’t greatness.

Size:

The size of the handset itself is wonderful. Really no complaints. It’s fits perfectly in your hand and Palm did a great job blending an awesome touchscreen with a separate multi-touch gesture area, sliding design, and everything else together in this package. It’s a happy medium between something larger like a Sidekick and smaller like a BlackBerry Pearl. As far as portability, it fits perfectly in your pocket and some people will love that the phone is so compact when closed — it’s really crazy small.

Feel:

This is an important area when designing a phone. Besides working like you had hoped, you want people to feel like they are holding a quality product, especially when talking about such a high-end product. Well, forget a high-end product, how about the product that everyone is counting on turning your company around? To be honest, the device feels a little cheap. The edges of the bottom piece are sharp on the back of the screen and even worse, when sliding it up and down, the top part that houses the screen will sometimes catch on itself.

It feels good in your hand, but the actual build quality really leaves a lot to be desired. One of our friends that checked it out over here said it felt like a Fisher Price toy. We wouldn’t go that far, but it really seems to be constructed with lower-grade materials compared to other flagship phones. One of the things that might be throwing us off is that it just feels so light. It’s an odd thing to happen when you’re expecting to be heavier than you’d imagine. Normally heavier = higher quality, but we’ll have to put the Pre through our usual battery of tests to really determine what’s going on here. The takeaway should be that it’s really light, feels a tad less expensive than we would have liked, and not as polished as it could have been.

OS:

WebOS itself is off to a great start we think. Taking the hardware aspects of the Palm Pre completely out of the equation, it has a bunch of potential. Especially with being public version numero uno. It will be interesting to see how developers try to take advantage of the operating system, yet we can’t help but feel it’s going to be iPhone web apps all over again until Palm releases an SDK that lets everyone (not just special partners) access areas of the OS that are needed to create applications that aren’t just “fluff”. Granted Pre apps will be a whole lot better than iPhone web apps ever were; it’s disheartening to see something like this happen out of the gate though. They will never be able to compete with the Symbian, Android, BlackBerry and iPhone app stores and services like this. But don’t worry too much — we’re sure Palm will come around in due time and release an SDK that gives devs access to everything! It’s just not optimal out of the gate, that’s all.

Switching gears, Synergy is so cool in itself. Well, the concept part of it. We haven’t linked everything together yet, but we’re not sure if Palm’s got the right approach. I mean, I’d like my Facebook contacts in a Facebook application, not in my main contacts app mixed with my Exchange and personal contacts. Obviously you can just not link Facebook, but the point is that centralizing data isn’t the end-all answer to our problems. It’s just that we have to create and manage them in a clean and organized manner.

Hey, what about Universal Search? Well, it works ok. We guess. It’s great they added a Twitter option to it instead of just Google, Wikipedia, and Google Maps, but what good is it when it just launches the respective web page for anything not stored locally? We also wish this could be 3rd party customizable. Imagine being able to integrate your favorite services into the Universal Search card.

One thing we didn’t tell you in our Hands On was that during our first photo session, the device completely reset. Like, wiped clean reset. We had to go through the entire setup process and get the phone up and running. Since we didn’t use an account, we’re not sure how the backup/restore function works (we haven’t tested it yet is what we mean), but everything looks to be tied to a Palm account including IM services, etc. No word on whether or not this is the final shipping OS, though. We hope not.

Multimedia:

On the unit we received, Multimedia was unable to be explored. It simply linked to non-existent help files (just like the webOS SDK Emulator does). We’re pretty sure after 10 years Palm has learned how to make an MP3 player, though, so we’ll just give them this one at no charge.

Battery life:

To be really fair, we haven’t been able to really put this thing through the ringer in regards to battery life. When we first got it, it had a pretty low charge of around 30% and that lasted for about two and a half hours of us taking photos, going through different options, etc. Take that for what you will but we don’t see a problem with Palm’s quoted battery life and from other reports, the battery is a pretty decent at keeping you going throughout the day. It is obviously removable which will make a bunch of you either jealous or angries, but for the rest of us, a quick swaparoo means you won’t need to lug around a solar charger in your pants. *Gasp*

Browser:

The browser for the most part renders pages properly and pretty quickly. It took around 15-20 seconds to pull up BGR over Sprint’s EV-DO connection but navigating is a little bit of a problem. We found that zooming in and out didn’t produce a smooth effect, rather it simply increased the size of the page sort of how Internet Explorer zooms in. Panning around was crisp though and the browser was incredibly responsive. It hasn’t locked up on us a single time which is pretty impressive considering we beat it up quite a bit, and with plenty of other stuff running as well. Additionally, the accelerometer was absolutely positively instant. The Pre switches between portrait and landscape more than lightning fast, no question, and we can definitely see motion-controlled gaming playing a big role for this little guy. Granted, you know, that little SDK thing happens we talked about earlier…

Applications:

To be honest, there weren’t too many applications to explore here. The App Catalog was empty so we were left scrounging around anything that’s preloaded. Google Maps was something that will come with every unit so we checked that out first. It works really well. Loading was quick and the location feature and GPS integration was effortless (not just Google Maps but the GPS works really well on this handset).

We ventured deeper and deeper into webOS and you know what we found? The PDF Viewer! It actually is pretty solid but all the Document-related apps on here are viewing capable only, not editors. But that’s coming later with DataViz.

The Media application layout looks really clean as well, you know, before you click something and are taken to the ominous Help files that don’t exist yet. The YouTube application that you have all seen by now has an awesome layout and we could see it being used very frequently with no issues.

Conclusion:

Everyone’s expectation are set enormously high for this device and it really feels like the original iPhone launch again. Well, maybe not quite as insane but still. Palm has done a masterful job of crafting and molding the hype factor, but there seems to be an underlying issue. In being so secretive, they’ve let people’s imaginations run wild and expectations couldn’t possibly be higher.

The OS is great. There’s no ifs ands or buts; it’s really refreshing to see something that’s brand new with a UI unlike anything else out there. The only problem with this is, Palm’s never been a hardware company that anyone’s really cared about. They have been the furthest thing from innovative since circa-2003 — their hardware has always been second rate at best and it doesn’t seem to be changing now. Couple that with the nation’s underdog carrier at a $299 price-point (before rebate), and we’re not sure how many people are going to be lined up overnight, yet we’re pretty confident once people are able to play a real unit themselves, there will be more than a lot of happy Palm Pre customers.

Once the initial Pre launch is over and done with and all the hype, smoke and mirrors are clear though, we can see Palm being pretty successful moving forward. Hell, Palm has converted tons of people into raging Pre fanboys before they could even see the phone in person! Very Apple-esque. More carriers will get the Pre, more handsets will be released and WebOS could very well keep things interesting even if the hardware is lacking.

385 Comments
  • wallyson

    I have the E71x and typing on it is like an elephant trying to use my puter keyboard. I have gotten better over time though. It really is that tough on the PRE?

  • tenaku

    “yet we can’t help but feel it’s going to be iPhone web apps all over again until Palm releases an SDK that lets everyone (not just special partners) access areas of the OS that are needed to create applications that aren’t just “fluff”.”

    just because the sdk is in javascript and HTML5 doesn’t mean the apps are going to be ‘fluff’. Almost every app included on the phone is written in the mojo sdk. Mojo apps will have access to the accelerometer, GPS, storage, phone radio, notifications, etc.

    The only launch apps I can think of that couldn’t possibly be written in Mojo are the document viewers and the Classic emulator.

  • Dan

    Good to see WebOS looks to be as promised. The keyboard was my main concern from the minute I saw the pics in January. Wife has a Centro now and I can not type on it because they are too close and hoping the spacing on the Pre will take care of that. Also wonder if the current SDK could bring a virtual keyboard similar to Cupcake. Thanks for the review BGR! Gonna have to hold one for myself before I’m sold unless I hear Flash Player 10, Orb, and an virtual keyboard will be available at launch.

  • MoreLikeBoyIdiot

    These guys can’t seem to get Apples balls out of their mouth long enough to do any sort of unbiased review; not only for the Pre, but everything else BGR does as well. Apple products are amazing, but I wouldn’t expect a 1st gen Pre to add up to a 3rd gen iPhone anyway. Although I do feel that the Pre will have the edge with all the amazing features it will have. Why can’t the world have 2 awesome phones in existence simultaneously;let the people have a choice!

  • http://devron.wordpress.com Devron Grant

    @Dash69 – Not necessarily that people are mad at BGR’s review. It’s just that there are many things not discussed. I mentioned 3 big ones, but I can think of about twenty more.

    I’m an iPhone user myself. Not sure if you’ve paid much attention to WebOS, but it’s not just about synching contacts with Facebook and MySpace. We’re talking multitasking, universal search, a better mail client, etc.

    As for the iPhone successor, effectively we’ve already seen it. It’s what they showed in the iPhone 3.0 presentation. And to me, that stuff was not groundbreaking beyond what we already have. It doesn’t matter what Apple announces on Tuesday — they’ve already shown their cards months ago, and honestly, that stuff isn’t more than what I had two years ago.

    I think if you gave the phone a chance, it will surprise you. (And it’s taking a lot for me to even consider moving away from my iPhone.)

  • blah

    @bg

    Any chance of going to the acid3 test site and seeing how the browser scores?

    I’m hoping all my iPhone web apps will work with little modification.

    I just tried on that other device and it hit 97 on acid3.acidtests.org

  • someone

    Apparently my comment was not approved because it said this phone was superior to the iPhone. It’s impossible for this review to be considered fair. It leaves out everything that the phone excels in and focuses on its supposed *weaknesses*.

  • Daine

    @ someone

    none of my comments are going through either damn shame.

  • big treo man

    I worked for ATT like last year and i had alot of calls from people having trouble with the IPHONE. i have Sprint and i live in no where land las cruces nm. i get great signal better than most with ATT. sprint is cheaper with better quality. Like i said when i worked for ATT…. TOO MANY COMPLAINTS about service, Lack of 3g coverage. SPRINT IS 4G PEOPLE COME ON…….

  • alberto simon

    @Devron Grant

    That is a nice post and sums it up nicely.

    I agree that its not really about hearing what people want to hear but a true review of all relevant pieces.

    I myself am an iphone owner and was considering a move. Its starting to sound like a palm pre first generation device may not be quite as refined as Iphone v3. I think that after jailbreaking my Iphone I pretty much can get all the things the pre has except the physical kb which doesnt appear to be that great. JB has afforded me (multi tasking with backgrounder (just need more ram which i hope the new iphone hardware gives), universal app launching.

    The things I was hoping the Pre could give me that I cant seem to get with iphone are
    1. one consolidated mailbox
    2. notifications (although notifier app on jailbroken iphone does ok) and SBSETTINGS
    3. better shape form phone
    4. faster 3g

  • Jason R

    That’s hardly a review and I am highly suspect on how old the OS on their review unit is. It’s obviously NOT a final build as the multi-media aspects of the OS are not working. This screams a beta testing unit to find and kill bugs to me. You don’t see people reviewing the public release candidate of Windows 7 so why is this fair? That’s what previews are for.

    I’m also extremely disappointed BGR decided to gloss over some of the features of WebOS that have everyone excited in the first place. Yes they talk about Synergy, but what about true and easy to manage (via the card metaphor) multi-tasking and non-intrusive notifications? These are big deals and yet hardly mentioned, if at all. Generally, it’s not a good idea to skip over major features in a review.

    I’ll give them their criticisms of the hardware’s build quality, but I would have liked them to spend more then a day with the keyboard before calling it a failure. Hardware keyboards can sometimes take a little time to get used to.

    As for the unit resetting itself on them, well again that’s why you DO NOT review pre-release software. Until we hear about that happening to people on their brand new Pre’s fresh out of a box from the SPRINT store it is not an issue.

    Overall very disappointed in BGR and I can see why some of the bigger tech blogs such as Endgadget and Gizmodo have not reported on their preview/review yet.

  • Blake

    I can’t believe we waited for THIS review. Disappointing. Let me know when you put it through the tests that you didn’t bother with: synergy, multitasking, how about the camera? Big release, tiny review.

  • Jelly

    I just don’t like the way it looks…. but maybe it’ll look better in person.

    I buy new devices all the time and don’t mind forking over the cash to do it. I just can’t see myself going back to Sprint for anything.

    The brand and user experience from last year left me really sour. Heck, I don’t even know anyone around me who uses Sprint anymore and I hang around a large crowd. Everyone either has iPhones or BlackBerry’s.

  • big treo man

    BY THE WAY ATT SUCKED SO MUCH THAT THEY GAVE US, THEIR EMPLOYEES A 15% DISCOUNT IF YOU HAD ATT,I HAD SPRINT NEEDLESS TO SAY. EVERY OTHER PLACED I WORKED I GOT AT LEAST 23% DISCOUNT ON SPRINT SO…. FUCK ATT

  • Mike

    Hmmm, still no mention of how well the phone makes calls. Sometimes it’s hard to remember that these things are actually phones.

  • Apple Is For Butt Pirates

    Anyone who can’t type on the Pre’s/Centro’s keyboard, or anything similar for that matter, either has no motor skills whatsoever and needs to go back to elementary school, or just likes to complain. I’m 6’3″ and have fairly large hands and do just fine on my girlfriends Centro, my brothers BB, and my iPhone keyboard. I will be getting the Pre because my contract is over and ATT service is terible in my area and Sprints is very good. I’m not to sure how it is elsewhere.

    P.S. You know what they say about guys with big hands!

  • Patrick

    wow that screen sucks!!!

    sidekick lx 2009 has the best screen ever on any phone!

    Palm Pre 2 Summer 2010!!!!

  • ken

    i think bg’s report was honest and maybe not what some people wanted to hear. ex: his review on the Tour seemed to be very positive, especially on the hardware side. i have to say it is extremely disappointing to hear of Pre’s hardware flaws. it doesn’t sound like the complete package and I think they might have problems. i think I will go either tour or iphone 3 at this point. anything is an upgrade from my 8830 – every time i drop the thing it absolutely explodes. it would have been much smarter to launch on verizon.

  • http://www.bgr.com The Boy Genius

    It’s not our fault Palm/Sprint didn’t send us a final review unit.

    We managed to get our hands on one, and whatever it was, it was.

    This is the most recent available OS as far as we’re aware.

  • Shawn

    I tested the Palm Centro before it came out.. And I have to admit that I hated that keyboard when I first got it…. BUT, After I had it for a week or so, I fell in love with it. Those sticky keys are amazing, so I’m very very glad to hear that the Pre’s keyboard is similar.

    I know not everyone will love the physical keyboard, but give it a chance. I have pretty big fingers and the centro worked amazing well after using it for a bit. This keyboard is bigger, so it’s going to be that much better.

  • Weee

    Go Sprint!
    Things have changed for this carrier over the last year and they are well on track … but to some it just takes time to turn the ship around in their minds … can’t wait to get the PRE and test it out!

  • Dave

    Great job on the review, was well worth the wait. Hopefully the Pre was worth the wait. At least once it comes out I won’t have to worry about getting fired for looking for the BG Pre review.

  • !!!

    Could you all stop fucking crying.

    Good lord.

  • someone

    @BGR:

    It’s really disappointing to see so much bias in this review. Please, go back through your review and just take a look at all the times you use the word “iPhone” and “disappointing”. All people ask for is an unbiased review. You spent way too much time hounding the phone for things such as an unreleased SDK rather than pointing out the things it does extremely well!

  • JOHN

    +1

1 2 3 4 5 6 16
blog comments powered by Disqus